🛸 New Government UAP Science Advisory Council Formed 👽
(defensescoop.com)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Look.... This is just a NEW attempt at laundering money and jerking people's chain.
Let's get REAL for a moment, shall we?
I'd say that probably 99.5% or more of every UAP, UFO, "Mysterious alien craft" are a product of the military industrial complex.
Disclosure of this technology before its time, is what THEY don't want. - for any number of reasons. I'd go so far to say those "missing scientists" also fall under this broad umbrella.
Now, I want you to take a look at this short video, that references a trade magazine article published in 1991, regarding the B.E.A.S.T. system. Essentially, they had a "UFO/Disc" covered like a disco ball with mini LED "monitors", sensors and cameras that would capture the terrain behind it and project it onto the "screens" on the exact opposite side/sides to essentially render it "invisible".
Furthermore, just like those "mysterious" 1.6 GHz signals picked up at UFO hotspots like Skinwalker Ranch, all one has to do is query the FCC frequency list to see who it is allocated to...
Watch - Now that was DECLAS'd, albeit quietly, 35 YEARS AGO - just imagine what technology exists today, as this tech has no doubt advanced in a logarithmic way ...
Open your eyes & your mind... and cool it with the demon bullshit. It's a convenient way to not think...
u/#swedishpopcorn
I agree with you about the UAP/UFO crafts we see as being a product of the military industrial complex. Money laundering — sure, that’s been happening in order to make the crafts and now, moving forward, they’ll use the money as a way to “investigate”.
Physics/biology/chemistry all point to the almost 100% impossibility of an extraterrestrial group of beings traveling through space from one solar system to another in a “space ship” — laughable if you know the math and the science that make this idea absurd.
Stargates/ Portals/ Interdimensional travel — that’s a very different story and it’s backed up by science.
I think you’re incorrect to dismiss the “demon bullshit” as a convenient way to “not think”.
Maybe I should have clarified - some use that to blanket everything UFO related and dismiss it immediately. Not all, but a good number from what I've witnessed... yanno?
Ah, I think I would agree with you in that respect.
Fear indoctrination stiffens the Brain and makes is difficult for them to stretch their minds around reality.
"Allegory of the Cave" in The Republic.
Never dismiss anything . Because anything is what will eventually bite you in the ass. Just don't give anything TOO MUCH attention.
Why would the government toss out some grainy ufo vids, then a week later have "verified" reports of ufo being on or near the earth, and now forming a ufo committee? Is this a yuge signal that we are not alone? Is all of this prepping the world for the disclosure of little green men, that way folks won't rush off with guns to annihilate our new neighbors? Something feels odd about ufo disclosures. Is it to ramp up ingrained fears amongst the crowds or are these worlds travelers here to help and this is a way to show us they exist without wanting to harm them?
I lean on the theory that if little green men are real then what place does Jesus Christ take in our societies? Is God real or is the Bible simple instructions from bygone generations on how we need to live our lives so we don't kill one another?
It feels off because they are continuing the lie.
The truth is that they have technology that they don't want to reveal. It would totally destroy the entire oil scam industry and we would no longer be energy slaves that they like to fuck around with, like some kind of sick & twisted ant farm.
You can tell this advisory council is a joke because they have Avi fucking Loeb on it. He honestly thought space rocks were really alien space craft. He's a fucking retard and you'll get nothing of use from him.
If something "feels odd" about the disclosures, it could well be that they are strange in a way we were not expecting, and we are not adept at understanding that our imagination of "strange" is not really relevant, compared to the reality of strange.
If you are going to contend there is a lie, then you must oblige by providing evidence to establish that it is a lie. As it is, you seem to have no trouble taking your baseless convictions as truth---anything contrary is therefore a lie. (Having watched this field for half a century, and from within the aerospace industry, I would suggest that the truth is that the government doesn't know or have ANYTHING. This, of course, would be very embarrassing to reveal, which is why they are taking their time with the disclosures.)
I've heard the claim of secret technology for about half a century, and there has NEVER been any substantiation. There is no "oil scam." Petroleum fuels the modern world. We would have had even more energy with nuclear power, had not the government imposed the wishes of those with an unreasoning fear of radiation, to prevent or hinder the construction of nuclear powerplants. I don't see us as being "energy slaves." Compared to the past, we are liberated from physical slavery by the use of the energy at our disposal.
The secret tech is fusion. The USA figured out both fission and fusion in the 40s, with the nuke tests. Fusion pulls energy from the "vacuum" of space, which is not actually empty. It's a medium similar to how fish live in water. And it turns out it's an endless well of energy.
They figured out how to initiate it and how to use it for propulsion. If you want to believe in aliens like Avi, then go for it. Fusion is how their craft would get HERE, in our part of space.
We have uncovered the research over the past couple of years. Look up the works of Friedwardt Winterberg, Hal Puthoff, Eric W. Davis, Sonny White, Thomas Bearden, David Froning, and more.
The whole UFO thing was created as a cover for this, so they could do testing in the open air. There have been whistleblowers like Bob Lazar, but they only know partial information, so they sound crazy. It's all on purpose.
The Phoenix Lights event was one such test. MH370 was another.
Ask yourself why Air Force Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland is missing.
Fusion not a chance. I worked with scientists in that subject matter when I was in graduate school in the 1970s. It was a standing joke that fusion power would always be 30 years in the future. Fusion obtains energy from the binding energy released when hydrogen nuclei are fused into helium nuclei, and it requires a fission bomb to create the conditions...which is why H-bombs are called "thermonuclear" bombs. Absolutely nothing to do with energy from the vacuum of space. You should read more actual science.
I met Robert Bussard shortly before his death when he briefed his polywell fusion concept to the Boeing Company. I also read his text on nuclear rocket propulsion. I took fusion physics courses in grad school. There are reasons why the problem is difficult.
I know something of Hal Putoff and Thomas Bearden. I won't call them crackpots, but their work leads nowhere.
UFOs are real and go back into the 19th century. Bob Lazar is a tale-teller and nothing more. There is a history to this, of which you are apparently unaware. You can't prove anything about the Phoenix Lights and MA370 was evidently a pilot suicide. If you run out of fuel over the ocean, the only place you go next is Down.
When 60,000 people go missing every year, McCasland is one of them. Asking a question like that leads to no answer, so you need to polish up on your rhetorical technique.
I'm not here to debate you, and I'm not your professor. I can't help you if what you learned in the 1970s is just wrong.
What I said is the truth, whether you believe it or not. Like with Trump, get on the train or get run over. Your choice.
If you'd like to know more, go talk to TAE Technologies (which is merging with Trump Media & Technology Group) or Helion. They have people working in both places that know and are working to commercialize it.
I quite agree with your opening. Of the two of us, I am the one with the scientific background and exposure to the topic. I am willing to share what I know. You are not acquainted much with the real subject (secret science videos don't count). I think I've read about TAE's approach, which is novel, and I wish them well. It has been an uphill battle for half a century or more. Bussard's polywell approach looked promising, but he unfortunately passed away before he could do much to popularize it for support.
Why would God not be real just because conscious entities exist on other planets or in other dimensions?
"Aliens OR God" is a false dichotomy .
The Creator is the creator of EVERYTHING, whether we call it "human" or not.
Maybe i just cannot get my mind around God creating trillions and trillions of stars. Heck, if there are trillions of stars, where did they come from? What was the big bang.
Please, I'm not denying there is a God, just wondering where He came from. If He did have a "mom and dad" when did they come about? So many questions, so little answers.
Maybe He only created a few hundred, then. KEK
The matter in our universe is composed of light, light which is the consciousness of God. EVERYTHING, all matter, is God Itself manifesting in the 3rd Density
Roberts, Jane. The Early Sessions: Book 9 of The Seth Material . New Awareness Network, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
If you read the Law of One the answers abound. Take what resonates with you, discard the rest until it calls again.
There is an old idea that the entire universe is simply within the mind of God. End of story. It is an arresting thought, however.
Some food for thought:
They Have Been LYING To You About Roswell For 70 Years
Decades of trust me bro stories about Roswell, UFO, and aliens and not one person ever mentions the secret Northrop Strip or the back engineering of Horten (and other) cutting edge German craft.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EtnLmflgGNM
The Truth about Roswell: Decoding Decades of Deception
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rih9-80p0Ec
Dark Journalist JFK UFO File Secret Physics With Joseph Farrell (There are two shows in this video. Watch both.)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1ehAz1KWOI
The Roswell I-Beam is a controversial piece of debris from the 1947 incident that purportedly featured alien hieroglyphic writing on its surface. The symbols were famously reconstructed by Jesse Marcel Jr., the son of a military intelligence officer who handled the debris, though his father later stated the son’s drawings were inaccurate.
Skeptics and researchers argue the "writing" is likely decorative tape or mylar foil used on Project Mogul balloons, which were high-altitude surveillance platforms. The tape often contained simple geometric or floral patterns that could be misinterpreted as script due to the secrecy surrounding the project and the fragmented state of the debris. Additionally, the popular image of Greek letters on an I-beam originated from the 1995 hoax film Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction, created by Ray Santilli, rather than actual evidence from Roswell.
This kind of hieroglyphic writing was seen not only on debris from Roswell craft in 1947 but also in Kecksburg in 1965:
https://www.stangordon.info/wp/kecksburg/
Note the similarities to Die Glocke, the alleged Nazi Bell:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Glocke_(conspiracy_theory)
Nitinol -- a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy developed in 1959. A precursor shape memory alloy was developed in the late 1930's.
They are doing this to placate all those who have vociferously demanded that they finally release all their data, that's why. You can't be asking questions about this when it was more or less forced on them by public pressure. No huge signal, just lots of photos and files. If you didn't want this, why didn't you argue against it when it was in the formative stages?
There is no theory about "if little green men" when there is no theory OF little green men (no data).
I completely agree with your assessment, something does feel off about the UAP disclosures. Randomnumbers has a good take on this - very plausible. Personally, I think that the “little green men” scenario is a deception and that we’re dealing with a very old elder race that has decided on deception instead of a frontal assault in order to rule over us humans.
May I suggest a two books that addresses some of your questions? For the “little green men” -Lights In the Sky & Little Green Men: A Rational Christian Look at UFOs and Extraterrestrials
For the God question — The Creator and the Cosmos: How the Latest Scientific Discoveries Reveal God
Both written by Hugh Ross who is an astronomer and a Christian, just so you’ll know his perspective.
I always had a problem with theoretical physics. They believe they can prove stuff that will never happen in the real world. A theoretical physicist proved the immaculate bullet in the JFK assassination was possible.
Scientists can be bought just like everyone else, the issue is that our populace has been dumbed down to the point that they can’t even understand basic laws of motion. Try explaining why it was impossible for the twin towers to fall at almost free fall to an adult.
Except that it was possible (it happened). According to engineering physics principles, which even more people can't seem to understand.
I should have given more context - impossible given the claims put forth by the federal government - you’re right, they did fall at almost free fall speed; it’s been calculated and the lies that NIST told.
EDIT: To be clear; it was a demolition, of some kind, and the DS in the US was in on it.
No demolition. Just an inertially-confined catastrophic collapse from compressive shear.
https://www.ae911truth.org/images/WTCPhysics/World-Trade-Center-Physics.pdf
This will be a little tricky; I need to use two windows to see the article and respond to it. This is interesting to me, because the view that I had developed independently was essentially identical to Bezant's. I take it there is no complaint with how the collapse began, so I will go on to other points.
The main bone of contention was "why didn't the north tower decelerate?" The answer, as Bezant pointed out, was that the deceleration periods were only .03 seconds in duration. Applied to an object free-falling as complete hesitation, that would have meant only a 1 foot/second (0.3 m/sec) deceleration as a jolt, imperceptible in the data. The failed floor would have added its mass to the falling mass and the process would continue. The skeptic seems to have some idea that the lower floors would have some kind of prolonged wrestling match with the oncoming mass. In the first case, it is totally expectible that the next few underlying floors would have compromised column strength due to the heat environment and conduction, so the initial resistance would be even less. Put it this way: a big semi-truck gets stalled on a railroad crossing, a train approaches, the driver flees, and the locomotive + train combination hits and utterly demolishes the semi, passing through the wreckage like it wasn't there in the first place. This happens too many times in life to be anything funny. But wasn't the train decellerated? Yes, for a miniscule fraction of a second, not enough to make a difference. Same idea. I have no confidence that Szamboti et al. conducted a credible refutation analysis. You can't say on the one hand that, yes, the lower floor failed---and then also that it still continued to resist.
What is going on is the accumulation of momentum, which the lower structure has to react with a force exerted over some time interval. In the present case, the momentum is huge and applied essentially instantaneously. The reactive force will skyrocket, and the resisting members will simply fail in shear. It happens so fast, the structure does not have time to deform. Shear is basically shattering. It also leaves 45-degree shear planes that everyone likes to declare as the signature of demolition. Not so. It's just what happens in any case where the compressive load causes shear failure. Also, the momentum ADDS to the downward force of the upper mass.
Explosions, Pulverization, Dismemberment, & Ejection of Materials: Violent disruption of structural materials during the failure events. Air compressed by collapsing floors and blowing out windows with drawn-out debris. Concrete has low strength in tension and will tend to crumble under failure in tension or compression. (Ever seen a concrete pillar crushed in a materials laboratory? I have.)
Molten metal: Steel and aluminum, resulting from the burning jet fuel, at an adiabatic flame temperature higher than either material. This is such an easy fact to establish, that the ignorant critic is easy to identify. How do you think molten steel is made in the first place? (Hint: anthracite coal burns at 2180 C, kerosene burns at 2093 C, each far above the melting point of iron.)
"Nano-Thermite": This is the most dubious claim. For one thing, thermite is a pyrotechnic, not an explosive. Secondly, what do they really mean when they claim something is "nano-thermite"? No one explains what they mean. if it is unreacted, it would have to be a fine mixture of elemental aluminum and iron oxide. Gee whiz, what do you suppose would result from a high-temperature fire environment that can burn iron (sparkler fireworks burn iron, burning iron sparks are produced at a grinding wheel against an iron object) and both melt and vaporize aluminum?
"What about WTC 7?": Different story. Similar dynamics. An independent analysis predicts that the central core fires would have heated beams to the point where they expanded out of their column brackets. Once the critical point is reached, the collapse is rapid. Same phenomenon of dismissible resistance on the way down. Building not designed to cope with that failure mode. Same mistaken identification of windows bursting from compressed air between collapsing floors as being explosions. Dismemberment as the result of...dismemberment. Pulverization because concrete has no resistance to it.
Give it up. It goes nowhere. How do you coordinate the flight of highjacked aircraft to collide at a specific floor, below which---all the way down---explosive charges have been placed in order to commit mass murders? That is not a theory. It is an outright magical fantasy.
What is the flashpoint of jet fuel? What is the melting point of the steel type that is used within buildings of that type? How many steel beams were used in either tower? Exactly how were the beams positioned? You’re comparing collisions along the x-axis, y-axis has the added factor of acceleration due to gravity.
I don’t need any “hints”, think what you want. Good for you for believing what the government fed you.
Also, why have no other buildings of that same type fallen due to fire?
I’m going to suggest that CERN isn’t doing what we’ve been told they were doing.
And you would know this how? Do you even understand what they say they are doing?
A new multidisciplinary team of expert researchers is assembling to supply scientific guidance to the U.S. government’s unidentified anomalous phenomena investigations and help agencies determine whether unexplained sightings pose national security threats or represent major new discoveries.
Well-known theoretical physicist and Harvard University Professor of Science Avi Loeb announced he would be leading this new UAP Science Advisory Council, which he unveiled in a post online this week.
Loeb and other officials involved in this work shared early details with DefenseScoop about the council’s vision and how it came together to support the Trump Administration’s new interagency UAP Governance Board.
“The [board], which will get advice from the science council as well as other committees, will assist in the timely coordination of declassification of UAP-related information, in accordance with Executive Order 13526, Classified National Security Information,” Loeb said, pointing to a presidential directive that establishes the uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying NatSec records. “The goal of the council is to advise the U.S. government on how to resolve the nature of [UAP].”
Federal agencies and the military have a long and complicated legacy dealing with technologies and craft that personnel have reported performing in ways that seem to defy or transcend modern capabilities.
At a high level, the Defense Department’s teams set up to study UAP — the modern term for UFOs and transmedium objects — have taken different shapes over the years. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) is the latest version. It was set up under the Biden administration in 2022 to fulfill a requirement in that year’s National Defense Authorization Act, following concerns from lawmakers that some UAP could be high-tech drones or other platforms developed by America’s enemies.
The office has issued multiple reports spotlighting the ever-expanding DOD portfolio of UAP investigations, and its insiders have maintained that they have found no evidence to confirm that any UAP cases involve extraterrestrial activity or technology to date.
In February, President Donald Trump indicated that he would be directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other relevant departments and agencies to “begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, [UAP], and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.”
So far, there were three batches of UAP files released on May 8, May 22, and June 12, 2026, via this initiative.
Loeb noted that the latest collection includes a new report that’s dated June 5, 2026, and signed by AARO’s Director Jon Kosloski.
“The report mentions that during two days in October 2023 law enforcement officials noticed anomalous phenomena including an orange ‘mother’ orb launching smaller red orbs. About 40% of the reported phenomena lack a reasonable explanation and remain unresolved,” Loeb told DefenseScoop. “The civil duty of scientists like myself is to serve the U.S. government by interpreting existing data or recommending how to get new data that would resolve the nature of UAPs. This is a detective story that can be resolved with better data.”
The scientist confirmed that all of the data shared with the newly installed team will be unclassified.
The UAP Science Advisory Council will report to a higher-level UAP Governance Board, which Loeb said will serve as an interagency body that can use each of its members’ capabilities and unique authorities to cohesively address national security threats posed by unexplained phenomena.
An ODNI official told DefenseScoop that the agency — alongside the FBI and DOD — established that new board “to provide guidance, recommendations and coordination at the interagency level, bringing together military, law enforcement, the intelligence community, and other civilian agencies,” in support of Trump’s recent directive on UAP transparency.
“The UAP Governance Board met for the first time yesterday,” the ODNI official said on Wednesday, without sharing the identities of the original participants.
The board’s mission statement includes that members will “integrate and optimize interagency processes involved in the investigation of UAP incidents and collection procedures used to analyze UAP data to ensure more effective support to” AARO.
The ODNI official also confirmed that the board is supported by several advisory groups with expertise and work outside the U.S. government, including the UAP Science Advisory Council.
Loeb supplied a list of other experts joining him on the new science council in its earliest days, as well as their focus areas in this forthcoming work to, as he put it, “help AARO resolve the UAP mystery.”
He said they are: Prof. Carol Cleland, anomaly identification; Dr. Richard Cloete, data analysis and AI tools; Dr. Omer Eldadi, data management, AI, and human psychology; Dr. Tim Gallaudet, oceanography; Ross Howard, communication; Ben Lamm, oceanography and biology; Dr. Devesh Nandal, numerical analysis and astrophysics; Prof. Garry Nolan, molecular biology and materials science; Dr. Michael Shermer, the study of anomalies; Dr. Peter Skafish, anthropology; Prof. Matthew Szydagis, instrumentation and data collection; and Dr. Jennice Vilhauer, quantitative psychology.
“Since UAPs are physical objects that interact with humans, the council includes members with expertise in physical sciences as well as psychology and biology,” Loeb explained. “All members had an intense interest in the scientific study of UAPs for many years.”
Among them is Tim Gallaudet, a retired U.S. Navy admiral who previously served as commander of the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command, assistant secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and in other senior roles.
Gallaudet told DefenseScoop that he hopes to apply his expertise and experience in ocean science, as well as government leadership, to help the council “most effectively accomplish its mission and support the new UAP Governance Board.”
During his own decades-long career, Loeb has advised lawmakers and U.S. government leaders on science and space matters, and also held many leadership positions in academia.
Over the past five years, he’s led the Galileo Project at Harvard University in search for extraterrestrial technological artifacts near Earth. At this point, the research team operates three observatories that collect and analyze data on millions of objects as they hustle to discover outliers that fall outside the performance envelope of human-made technologies.
“My leadership style promotes transparency and trust. This is why I was the longest serving chair, for three terms of 3 years, in the history of Harvard’s Astronomy department,” Loeb said.
In his view, if the orbs in AARO’s recent report represent unknown technologies employed by adversarial nations, then they would mark a serious breach of national security.
That’s why he believes that resolving their nature should be a high priority for the U.S. government, requiring the development of better sensors and AI algorithms to collect and interpret new data.
“The down-to-Earth interpretation of UAP is that we are dealing with human-made technologies. In this case, the defense system of the U.S. against espionage on strategic assets is being compromised,” Loeb told DefenseScoop. “We know about the Chinese spy balloon that was shot down in 2023. When finding an ant on the kitchen cabinet, we get alarmed because we realize that there must be many more ants hiding elsewhere in the kitchen.”
The frequency of the new science council’s meeting cadence has not been decided.
“We will make the best lemonade out of the lemons we are given,” Loeb said. “The best is yet to come. Stay tuned to future updates.”
More money laundering.