"Our ancestors" had nothing to do with most crime control. Their owners kept them in constant fear of random hanging , jailing , slavery or banishment to some distant penal colony which kept most in line. Granted an occasional vigilante group would remove the true criminals the rulers wouldn't.
Why do you think America guaranteed a jury of your peers ?
Why did the Church switch from eliminating their enemies to opposing hanging ?
(Pope Innocent I (405 AD) defending the death penalty as a legitimate exercise of God-granted authority. )
It's not a controversal theory, though I'm sure they would not have taught it to you in school or the media. However, real scientists agree that there is a genetic component, and what they're willing to admit is just a part I'm sure.
According to BraveAI summary:
"The most cited variant is the MAOA gene (often nicknamed the "warrior gene" or, inaccurately, the "serial killer gene"). Located on the X chromosome, the low-activity variant (MAOA-L) results in reduced breakdown of neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine. This can lead to heightened impulsivity and aggression, particularly when combined with adverse environmental conditions like mistreatment or stress.
Other genes linked to increased risk include CDH13 (associated with neural connectivity and ADHD) and dopamine-related genes like DAT1 and DRD2. Studies suggest that while genetics account for approximately 50% of the variance in aggressive behavior, the remaining 50% is attributed to environmental influences. Most individuals carrying these risk variants do not commit violent crimes, and the presence of these genes is not considered a definitive legal defense for criminal acts. "
They also starved people and hung them for stealing food. I mean, this was during the time England caused the potato famine, wasn't it? The premise sounds good.
And the "Stocks" in the town square. 🙄
Our ancestors knew how to handle it
When the judiciary system has a bias for the perpetrators and against the victim this is the outcome
"Our ancestors" had nothing to do with most crime control. Their owners kept them in constant fear of random hanging , jailing , slavery or banishment to some distant penal colony which kept most in line. Granted an occasional vigilante group would remove the true criminals the rulers wouldn't.
Why do you think America guaranteed a jury of your peers ?
Why did the Church switch from eliminating their enemies to opposing hanging ?
(Pope Innocent I (405 AD) defending the death penalty as a legitimate exercise of God-granted authority. )
What about the 13% that committs 50%+ of the crime today?
Bring it back!!
It's not 1% overall, it's 1% per generation (which is much higher).
Just as a reminder, in 1820, there were 200 capital crimes, including:
Treason
Offences against God
Riot
Destruction of flags and monuments
Perjury
Terrorism
Health Crimes
Smuggling
Murder
Sodomites
Wounding
Rape
Kidnapping
Theft of items worth $10 or more in today's money
Burglary and allied offences
Pickpocketing
Corruption
Blackmail
Bankruptcy
Forgery of deeds, bonds, testaments, bills of exchange, stocks, stamps, banknotes, etc.
Fraud
Insurance crimes
Doctoring money
Arson
Sounds like a good start.
Now we have generations to make up for
Exactly, it needs to be rapidly extended to make up the backlog
1% is a start, but... I believe we should hang the 4-6% lost forever.
But wouldn’t have any politicians. How could we survive?/s
Facts
Certainly a good start. Not that they aren't already guilty of capital crimes.
Take Note Europe. This might be your fast lane to salvation.
Oh they're already sunk, too little too late. I'm interested in implementing it here
I don't respect defeatism and demoralizing comments. You know who are known to do that. The IDF. Keep that in mind.
They hung all those people and completely eradicated crime. Pulled it right out of the gene pool.
Not completely, but they certainly reduced it
If erasing crime from the gene pool worked it have happened already…its not a genetic thing…its a sinful fallen nature thing…we all have it
I agree and that's why this tweet is stupid and is for stupid people. Sometimes you have to show them.
Criminality is genetic? Prove it.
The fact that Europe ruled the world when it hanged it's unwanted; and the fact that its now a shithole hellscape because it doesn't proves it works.
Remove the worthless, society will flourish. It's not complicated
It's not a controversal theory, though I'm sure they would not have taught it to you in school or the media. However, real scientists agree that there is a genetic component, and what they're willing to admit is just a part I'm sure.
According to BraveAI summary:
"The most cited variant is the MAOA gene (often nicknamed the "warrior gene" or, inaccurately, the "serial killer gene"). Located on the X chromosome, the low-activity variant (MAOA-L) results in reduced breakdown of neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine. This can lead to heightened impulsivity and aggression, particularly when combined with adverse environmental conditions like mistreatment or stress.
Other genes linked to increased risk include CDH13 (associated with neural connectivity and ADHD) and dopamine-related genes like DAT1 and DRD2. Studies suggest that while genetics account for approximately 50% of the variance in aggressive behavior, the remaining 50% is attributed to environmental influences. Most individuals carrying these risk variants do not commit violent crimes, and the presence of these genes is not considered a definitive legal defense for criminal acts. "
To nitpick, that is aggression, not criminality.
Well I'm sure they correlate. Aggressive, stupid people are more apt to commit violent crimes.
There is such a thing as non violent crime
Are you a retard?
Why didn't they teach it if it isn't contraversial?
Not PC
Yep. That's how they got rid of crime. They hung the ones that had the gene for it. Can't be found today and there isn't any crime there.
The violent crime rates among the white european-americans are vanishingly low compared to blacks or hispanics, so it must have had some effect.
Public executions are a necessary step towards restoring civilization
They also starved people and hung them for stealing food. I mean, this was during the time England caused the potato famine, wasn't it? The premise sounds good.
Agree,they got way carried away with killing people.
For which read "the Irish were too dumb and lazy to grow enough food and preferred to sell their kids", but otherwise, yes.
The Irish grew it all. The English stole it.
Both are my ancestors.
The English are certainly evil, but a bunch of lazy drunkard moochers get no sympathy from me. They should never have been allowed to move here
Lol. I don't where you mean by 'here'. But I'd take my cousins over any dark ones, any day.
I wouldn't take any of them