What we see is retaliatory strikes against a hostile force that refuses to negotiate peace deals. What we dont see is specific targets taken out under the cover of failing peace talks. The Irgc is not fighting for survival. They are fighting for their leaders survival.
I mean disguising one cargo as another is an age old smuggling tactic.
But indiscriminately attacking shipping to force a slow down or stall of a shipping route. Is also an equally valid tactic if your objective is to cause chaos and split attention.
Like if your backers are currently being bombed by a Major nation so you cause trouble to hopefully reduce the pressure and split the forces attacking your bosses.
And well as another Commenter noted. Some of those events listed like the Ammonium Nitrate explosion in Beirut did reportedly result in massive civilian casualties. The implication then it was a deliberate act by the ‘Good’ side or at least as ‘Morally Good’ as anyone is in a cloak and dagger shadow war. Is kind of unsettling as the implication is that collateral damage among the general populace is okay.
And while decoders far away from the arena may accept that. One may feel different if you or a loved one are one of the people written off as acceptable collateral damage by a number crunching suit in a bunker or office.
The deep state weaponized AN in the great West, Texas s**t fire. Said we couldn't use it on crops anymore cuz we could make a bomb out of it. Then they proceeded to use it to blow up West in 2013. State insurance inspector and TDEM Tx Dpt Emergency Mgmt both said in official documents that a GOLF CART started the fire but everybody blamed AN. AND YEP IT WAS A DRILL one of the first ones out there that got any attention.
Federal authorities, specifically the ATF have called the West, Texas fertilizer plant fire, and resulting AN explosion, and intentional criminal act. Reported in 2016.
Consider the first cited event, the 2020 explosion in Beirut of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate (AN)...which is nearly equivalent to 2.75 kilotons of TNT, to put it in high yield units of measure. This resulted in 218 deaths and ~7,000 injuries. If this is a "White Hat" operation, I want no part of it, nor should any of us here.
No mystery about the explosion. The AN had been taken off a ship and stored without proper safety precautions for 6 years. A nearby fire was all it needed to cook-off and detonate. AN is an actual explosive, a main component of amatol. This is, sadly, an old story. In 1947 at the port of Texas City, TX, a ship laden with 2,300 tons of AN detonated in the world's heretofore largest chemical explosion, resulting in 581 deaths and ~5,000 injuries.
The other events are thrown up as suggested conspiracies as well, but without the slightest shred of evidence or implication. I will pass.
Panal Canal, China. Strait of Hormuz, Lloyds of London.
Promethean Update has a great video on maritime dominance by the cabal, and how Trump has been destroying it all year
https://youtu.be/Y_S2yfSfUBY?is=xsl9Fb17idtZoJtG
https://files.catbox.moe/et1ek3.webp
Maybe we should watch the water.
Nah, if that was the case Q would have said something...
u/#q847
What we see is retaliatory strikes against a hostile force that refuses to negotiate peace deals. What we dont see is specific targets taken out under the cover of failing peace talks. The Irgc is not fighting for survival. They are fighting for their leaders survival.
The dismantling of the TerraMar Project??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_TerraMar_Project
I mean disguising one cargo as another is an age old smuggling tactic.
But indiscriminately attacking shipping to force a slow down or stall of a shipping route. Is also an equally valid tactic if your objective is to cause chaos and split attention.
Like if your backers are currently being bombed by a Major nation so you cause trouble to hopefully reduce the pressure and split the forces attacking your bosses.
And well as another Commenter noted. Some of those events listed like the Ammonium Nitrate explosion in Beirut did reportedly result in massive civilian casualties. The implication then it was a deliberate act by the ‘Good’ side or at least as ‘Morally Good’ as anyone is in a cloak and dagger shadow war. Is kind of unsettling as the implication is that collateral damage among the general populace is okay.
And while decoders far away from the arena may accept that. One may feel different if you or a loved one are one of the people written off as acceptable collateral damage by a number crunching suit in a bunker or office.
The deep state weaponized AN in the great West, Texas s**t fire. Said we couldn't use it on crops anymore cuz we could make a bomb out of it. Then they proceeded to use it to blow up West in 2013. State insurance inspector and TDEM Tx Dpt Emergency Mgmt both said in official documents that a GOLF CART started the fire but everybody blamed AN. AND YEP IT WAS A DRILL one of the first ones out there that got any attention.
Federal authorities, specifically the ATF have called the West, Texas fertilizer plant fire, and resulting AN explosion, and intentional criminal act. Reported in 2016.
https://nitter.poast.org/TheDebriefing17/status/1943389305025761424
You can delete everything after the ? on the first line, after you paste that into your browser. FYI. (here it is, cleaned up) https://nitter.poast.org/TheDebriefing17/status/1943389305025761424
Thanks for answering the question I was about to ask after seeing that gargantuan URL
looks the same to me. haven't clicked however
As far as I know AN requires a primary explosive to detonate it. Fire doesn't do it.
heat
I’ll take the topic, “images that are photoshopped” for $200, Alex.
Consider the first cited event, the 2020 explosion in Beirut of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate (AN)...which is nearly equivalent to 2.75 kilotons of TNT, to put it in high yield units of measure. This resulted in 218 deaths and ~7,000 injuries. If this is a "White Hat" operation, I want no part of it, nor should any of us here.
No mystery about the explosion. The AN had been taken off a ship and stored without proper safety precautions for 6 years. A nearby fire was all it needed to cook-off and detonate. AN is an actual explosive, a main component of amatol. This is, sadly, an old story. In 1947 at the port of Texas City, TX, a ship laden with 2,300 tons of AN detonated in the world's heretofore largest chemical explosion, resulting in 581 deaths and ~5,000 injuries.
The other events are thrown up as suggested conspiracies as well, but without the slightest shred of evidence or implication. I will pass.
Most of the ones listed are small ship fires that hit the news and had no real results, then the last one just says: Various fires all over the globe.
Aside from the giant first explosion, the rest are fairly routine accidents, that one just happens to be a fairly large fuck up.
Sideways in Suez no accident .
Upvoted and reposted.