3
1Markseeker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ive got a friend saying, "If QE dies then they will just let Charles rise to the throne. He will be much worse"

2
1Markseeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same.

"Look! A Triangle!"

"Right side of the screen! A Spiral!"

20
1Markseeker 20 points ago +21 / -1

I dated a girl with a lazy eye once.

Had to break up with her though.

She kept seeing someone on the side...

4
1Markseeker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even God can draw a straight line with a crooked stick.

We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

1 Peter 1:19-21

1
1Markseeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. You have no background in this topic whatsoever. Pearls before swine.

1
1Markseeker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Such an educational response. Typical.

1
1Markseeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is painfully obvious that you have absolutely no experience with the nature of bibliographic evidence for the transmission of ancient texts.

The NT possesses over 25,000 manuscripts. The more you have, the more reliable the translations and transmission. To give you an idea by comparison, Plato has 7 manuscripts. Aristotle? 5. Caesars Gallic wars? 10. The Annals of Tacitus? 20. None come close.

Do you doubt the authenticity of these historical writings too? Of course you don’t.

The time gap between when the original autograph was written and our first copy for the NT manuscripts are some of the shortest gaps in early antiquity. NT time gaps range from 7- 60yrs for entire books. The average time gap for the writings mentioned above? 1000 years. Do you even understand what that means?

If one throws out the NT documents as being unreliable, then one must throw out ALL of 1st century history. You can’t pick and choose.

Oh, by the way, the whole KJV thing is simply a red herring in this discussion. So just give that a rest. You brought up the KJV, I didn’t.

1
1Markseeker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wow. That was impressive.

<eyeroll>

Would’ve been more powerful of a counter had you included a good ol “Nuh uh, your momma!”

-1
1Markseeker -1 points ago +1 / -2

What’s funny about your position is that in order to know the Bible “has been fucked with” you must first know what the “unfucked Bible” said to begin with.

Do you see the circularity of your position?

The Bible is one of the best preserved books from ancient antiquity. Hands down. None compare or can hold a candle to it. Be assured fellow believers who are reading this, that the Bible you’re holding and reading IS accurate and reliable.

Bring it skeptics...

10
1Markseeker 10 points ago +11 / -1

I’m thinking Biden’s speech was done as a set up for trumps speech tomorrow. A juxtaposition. A compare and contrast. Il Dinaldo Trumps latest post makes me think this. He says, “Tomorrow’s speech is going to be 💥” with gunship cannons going off behind him.

3
1Markseeker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ivermectin is a promising agent that could strongly increase melanoma therapy efficiency because it is cytotoxic for BRAF-wt and BRAF mutated melanomas and because it increases the efficiency of antimutated BRAF inhibitors independent of the BRAF status of tumors.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2405864516300021#:~:text=Ivermectin%20is%20a%20promising%20agent,the%20BRAF%20status%20of%20tumors.

"Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

Another study demonstrated that ivermectin, at doses of 3–5 mg/kg, was able to suppress the growth of human melanoma and a number of other cancer xenografts in mice without adverse effects (6)

https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mmr.2017.8231

7
1Markseeker 7 points ago +8 / -1

Either you aren't aware of the explanations given about Trumps stance on the Stroke Poke, or you don't like any of the explanations given.

Which one is it for you?

15
1Markseeker 15 points ago +15 / -0

You member the scene in Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail where the knight runs up the embankment towards the castle, and each time the two guards at the gate look up at him he’s starting over at the bottom?

That what this feels like...

2
1Markseeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

2.5G Network= Biden Cheated

5g Network = Trump Won

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›