-6
289m -6 points ago +1 / -7

how does saying baby instead of cherub ruin my comparison? i think this post makes this community look very stupid. maybe that's the reason she shared the image, because she knew people like you would share half baked theories about it.

the less said about your comparison, the better. sometimes when the HEART is tugged at, the BRAIN just shuts itself off.

-4
289m -4 points ago +1 / -5

it is totally fine... have you never seen/been a kid on a trampoline? or sat in a plastic tub? it isn't fatal to be in an awkward pose for the duration of a photo.

5
289m 5 points ago +5 / -0

basically you just gotta go by how good it is for partying.

#1 would have to be the hauler. its a pool. its a dance floor. its a very dangerous skating rink.

if you really didn't want to bike everywhere that monster can't fit, the bus would be a decent compromise. just for maximum chaos, i've always wanted to convert the top of a double decker bus into a bowling alley. doesn't that just sound gloriously unsafe?

and if you reeeally had to make it under that one bridge.... the pink mercedes is obviously the only choice. this is the only one that needs zero modifications, although it looks like it has room for some extra storage or anti air missiles or whatever one might desire.

very much enjoy your list. this is the kind of intellectual discussion i come here for. TY RTT

-8
289m -8 points ago +1 / -9

appreciate it. some people will have to get used to the fact that we are team truth before anything else.

and yeah, i have zero attachment to her as an actress or as anything else. certainly have no desire to defend her, i just gotta speak up when i see people flying off the handle for next to nothing.

-12
289m -12 points ago +2 / -14

i think you're a little biased due to your mistrust of the source. this could be anyones summer cabin photo. recommend looking at the other pics in the series for context.

sure, it could be an elaborate cover up. not denying the existence of those, especially in hollywood.

but to me the entire scenario makes perfect sense. look at the other photos in the set. to me, occams razor says it is what it appears to be.

-6
289m -6 points ago +1 / -7

seems like an arbitrary distinction to me. yes there are naked babies and 8 year olds in my family albums and a couple on display. neither are developed. neither are sexually attractive unless you're a pedophile.

5
289m 5 points ago +5 / -0

yandex and metacrawler are good.

-12
289m -12 points ago +1 / -13

naked doesn't mean porn. aren't there naked babies on the sistine chapel? her expression looks serene.

accusing someone of having weird taste is one thing. but lets try to resist jumping to conclusions without having all the facts.

2
289m 2 points ago +2 / -0

I grew up atheist. the Bible played a significant but relatively minor role in my development. The majority of my worldview comes from other sources, though i don't think i would have found them without the help of the Bible.

Ask yourself... Why would the Bible not answer all these questions explicitly? The answer is important.

If the Bible were any different, society would be different as well. That means it says exactly what it needs to say... A movie is not effective when you've read spoilers. it is most effective when Act 2 leaves you feeling like there is no hope.

-2
289m -2 points ago +1 / -3

for sure. but not always for the reason we assume. maybe i just don't want your kids coming over lol

-14
289m -14 points ago +2 / -16

its not, its a plastic tub. but you can take a bath in anything that holds water. another anon provided a link that puts the picture in context, and the girl appears to be happy before and after being in the tub.

-31
289m -31 points ago +2 / -33

the picture is of a kid having a bath in a plastic tub.

somewhere there's a pic of me having a bath in a plastic flower pot. that's on someones wall. not illegal. not murder. not pedophilic. just a kid chillin in a tub.

I'm not saying she's innocent... but this is not evidence... i know normal ass people who would put this up, so i don't even really consider it suspicious.

this is not the time to stop digging and say gotcha.

-2
289m -2 points ago +1 / -3

never seen a pic of a kid in a bath on a wall? taste in art notwithstanding, it isn't pornographic, or indicative of anything sinister. kid loves

-3
289m -3 points ago +1 / -4

i've taken baths in weirder vessels. this isnt that weird

-4
289m -4 points ago +1 / -5

okay but the kid is clearly taking a bath. weird, but not as weird as we're making it out to be.

2
289m 2 points ago +2 / -0

sorry, its just that you sound like a professional doomer here.

don't worry about the nukes. you are watching a movie. good movies get scary sometimes.

if you wanna know why i'm right, look up march 24th 1967 in Roy, Montana. nuclear war will not be allowed.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›