I was expecting her to have hands like the Somali pirate "I am the Captain now" from the memes and the movie Captain Phillips🤣
Under Section 401(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940 (1940 Act), U.S. nationals would lose their nationality by serving in the armed forces of a foreign state (1) unless expressly authorized by U.S. law and (2) only if the U.S. national had or acquired the nationality of the foreign state.
So, did it affirm Ukrainian nationality by cutting off its US nationality?
Jurisidiction of the United States is defined by the corner stones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_markers_of_the_original_District_of_Columbia
A private American company that provides satellite internet services to Russian territory would be in violation of sanctions.
Before massive sanctions on Russia, Mastercard and Visa did not work in Crimea, but worked in Russia.
Impeachment is a civil removal. She should be charged criminally.
I don't know about New Mexico, but Texas has a provision:
Sec. 28. SUSPENSION OF LAWS. No power of suspending laws in this State shall be exercised except by the Legislature.
Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91 at 109 (1945):
It is said, however, that this construction of the Act will not save it from the infirmity of vagueness since neither a law enforcement official nor a trial judge can know with sufficient definiteness the range of rights that are constitutional. But that criticism is wide of the mark. For the specific intent required by the Act is an intent to deprive a person of a right which has been made specific either by the express terms of the Constitution or laws of the United States or by decisions interpreting them. Take the case of a local officer who persists in enforcing a type of ordinance which the Court has held invalid as violative of the guarantees of free speech or freedom of worship. Or a local official continues to select juries in manner which flies in the teeth of decisions of the Court. If those acts are done willfully, how can the officer possibly claim that he had no fair warning that his acts were prohibited by the statute? He violates the statute not merely because he has a bad purpose but because he acts in defiance of announced rules of law. He who defies a decision interpreting the Constitution knows precisely what he is doing. If sane, he hardly may be heard to say that he knew not what he did.
Why does he dishonor his Polish ancestry by mispronouncing his name?
Rz has a specific sound, independent of English speakers attempting to say it.
RZ -- like “s” in the English word “measure”, pronounced exactly like ‘rz’ (see below).
EXAMPLE: żyrafa -- a giraffe.
The technical federal term for non-Mexican wetbacks is Other Than Mexican (OTM). They count this in statistics.
https://www.foxnews.com/story/other-than-mexican-welcome-to-america
Brazilians, Chinese, Pakistanis and many others are joining the tide of Mexicans who sneak across every day.
"OTMs include people from all over the world — South America, the Middle East, the Caribbean," explained former Immigration and Naturalization Service Special Agent Michael W. Cutler, currently a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies (search). "Anyone other than Mexican is an OTM."
In 2001, 5,251 "OTMs" were caught crossing over from Mexico. Last year, the number was more than 35,000.
This reminds of the meme that shows a normal looking guy with a full beard. He shaves and looks likes like a sped (special needs) guy with a receding chin!
Here, found it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/by8oln/you_know_shaving_your_beard_really_does_take_you/
The Holman rule is a rule in the United States House of Representatives that allows amendments to appropriations legislation that would reduce the salary of or fire specific federal employees, or cut a specific program. Versions of the rule were in effect during 1876–1895 and again during 1911–1983.
It was reinstated for the Republican-controlled 115th Congress during 2017–2019, and several amendments were proposed that progressed to a vote of the full House, but none were adopted. The rule was rescinded once more at the beginning of the 116th Congress upon Democrats taking control of the chamber, and was restored once Republicans retook the House majority for the 118th Congress in 2023.[1]
Great, they can reduce gun violence in DC and the Territories.
4 U.S. Code § 71 - Permanent seat of Government
All that part of the territory of the United States included within the present limits of the District of Columbia shall be the permanent seat of government of the United States.
4 U.S. Code § 72 - Public offices; at seat of Government
All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.
Otherwise provided by law- They never list the names of the 50 states in the federal law definitions.