4
Bostonstronk 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is no such thing as "binding a future President" short of a constitutional amendment. All he has to do is have an executive order that makes it extremely untenable for everyone to hold him to the current treaty and voila. Trump is the master of taking a situation and turning it into a win for his side no matter what the other side does. Remember, as President he is the most powerful man in the world

2
Bostonstronk 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's interesting how closely after "training exercises" real situations often follow. Even if it doesn't go live during training if I was you I'd find somewhere else to work

2
Bostonstronk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I went a step further and objected to the tracking of vaccine status at all. I said the tracking of status was a prelude to a Mark of the Beast system, which I cannot participate in due to my religious beliefs.

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +2 / -1

This hasn't ever worked for anyone who has used it as a legal defense..so it's not the linchpin and it's not profitable to spend time on it.

2
Bostonstronk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think this is a profitable way to spend our time, nitpicking the documentation of our lives. You can't beat them at legal games, they invented them. The thing they fear is physical pain.

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's what I mean. Clearly the methods described in the protocols were deployed against the USA. So if this was a "forgery" designed to put the blame on Jews, the logical thing to do is to figure out whodunnit. But to claim it's a "forgery" and NOBODY done it is contradictory.

7
Bostonstronk 7 points ago +8 / -1

I believed they were genuine from the moment I read them. Their legitimacy was immediately dismissed without any attempts to find the actual author, which is what people do when they're caught

2
Bostonstronk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bet the ratio of feds to "true believers" is the same as the mythical "good rank and file" at the FBI.

3
Bostonstronk 3 points ago +3 / -0

No state will comply with federal rules that outlaw coal. No red state, anyway. If coal goes so does electricity for 90 percent of any metro area's population. Nuclear and other alternatives are not even close to matching coal's output. The grid would go down everywhere

5
Bostonstronk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Does anyone on the actual right even know anyone involved in this faggotry

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if he did who gives a shit. Russia doesn't have Miranda rights, cry me a river. The commies and alinsky disciples hide behind our compassionate laws to commit long term crimes across generations. Fuck em.

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +1 / -0

At the same time the only reason this is going public now is so your favorite Ukrainian flag waving congress critter can claim "the CIA put that there" when their favorite hobby leaks

3
Bostonstronk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. The longer he lives the more of a nothingburger this is. The movie Shooter already explained "there's no head of the snake to cut off" and "there's no Republicans or Democrats, there's only those with power and those without". The fact that they all collude to keep outsiders from implementing change has been public knowledge since...that movie came out, at least, and nobody did anything about that. So what's a bigger story than that?

3
Bostonstronk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure one of Alinsky's principles is to run democrats on both sides of an election, that way it doesn't matter who wins. That's what the majority of this is. 90 percent of elected Republicans are infiltrators who only vote Republican once in awhile to maintain their cover or on "symbolic" wins that have no teeth when it comes to advancing a Republican agenda. As long as the candidate doesn't appear trans or with a gay lover in public, nobody bothers to vet candidates as long as they read from the Bible on the campaign trail. Once they're a "red" incumbent in a "red" state they can stay there indefinitely

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +1 / -0

I distinctly remember a grim reaper in the background of videos from that part of the world. Maybe not the king's coronation but something around Buckingham Palace for sure

10
Bostonstronk 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wasn't there a mysterious grim reaper figure prowling around his coronation?

6
Bostonstronk 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are saying "tell your doctor if you are vaccinated or plan to be" in drug ads now. At the end where they talk fast about the potential side effects

0
Bostonstronk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just because we believe there was a plan doesn't mean we believe it is currently on track.

1
Bostonstronk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol yes we would. We already did in the 2020 election. If having an election that blatantly stolen did not rally us to take up arms, nothing can. Not even a physical attack by a foreign power. We have reached terminal apathy

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›