1
Cardinalix 1 point ago +1 / -0

Presumptuous to assume anyone on our side 'allowed' this to happen. Also, what is your evidence that the photo is fake? I am open to the possibility, but possibility isn't evidence.

2
Cardinalix 2 points ago +2 / -0

There would not have been a war because Chamberlain would have pursued appeasement. War is unnecessary when you just surrender.

2
Cardinalix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you think anything would be different if Chamberlain had remained Prime Minister? I think not.

4
Cardinalix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chamberlain was all about appeasement, Churchill was not.

3
Cardinalix 3 points ago +3 / -0

The film is called Any Given Sunday

6
Cardinalix 6 points ago +6 / -0

The same Chamberlain that supported the drunken slob?

4
Cardinalix 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe this is exactly why it will never happen. Americans with steady employment and disposable income are Americans that are difficult to rule over. Income tax is how to keep incomes low and the population controlled, a lever of power this critical to the ruling class will never disappear absent a miracle or abolishment of our government.

2
Cardinalix 2 points ago +2 / -0

So... If I understand you correctly and every leader including Trump is compromised then what would "discussing his flaws" accomplish exactly? The Democrats are busy doing that all day everyday. Do you find the fact that Trump has been attacked unlike anything I have ever seen sway you at all that maybe he is actually opposed to the powers that be?

1
Cardinalix 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there another leader we should support? Or is this another "we're doomed without bloodshed" call-to-violence post?

2
Cardinalix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every state has passed laws that give law enforcement the right to identify you. If you refuse to provide ID, or claim you don't have any they have the right to place you under arrest and fingerprint you to ID you. This has been upheld against 4th amendment challenges.

1
Cardinalix 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about your requirement that someone 'conclusively eliminate' all other possible causes. That is a ridiculous standard worthy of scorn.

3
Cardinalix 3 points ago +3 / -0

-"3) conclusively eliminate all other possible causes..."

What an utterly preposterous standard.

1
Cardinalix 1 point ago +1 / -0

If pretending is the word you would use for a pack of lies and corruption, then yes.

1
Cardinalix 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the 16th amendment that was never ratified?

4
Cardinalix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or since Trump is going to be tried for election interference, could they use this against him? Seize his assets? Just spitballing, here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›