That's because it doesn't accept inputs from conversations. It will remember what you said for the length of the conversation but it does not incorporate anything you say into it's data set by design.
That was my read as well.
Brave, unbowed, unbroken. We need a million more like him. Well done young man.
Have a good rest sir. I'll do the same. You clearly do not understand the nature of power.
In that case I would be happy to respond to your pivot as soon as you acknowledge that the President does indeed have the power to fire an employee at FEMA.
Was this intended for me or for a different conversation with someone else? I only ask because it is so far off the point.
At most, the President can exert his power of office over the Secretary of Homeland Security and have them fire the person at FEMA, but that's about it.
LMFAO
I'm looking for an acknowledgement that the President indeed has the power to fire an employee at FEMA. Very simple.
Well hell, going by your margins there, the President has the power to to do a shit ton of things that aren't legal, and aren't ethical, and that he shouldn't do.
I agree wholeheartedly.
Does that make it legal? No. Does that make it ethical? No. Just because he can, does it mean he should? No.
No argument here. However your original assertion that I took issue with was that the President did not have the power to fire an employee at FEMA. Even saying it was a matter of grade school Civics that he couldn't. You have not demonstrated that fact at all and now you have pivoted off the point.
It seems to me that when we say someone has the power to do something it means they have the authority or leverage to make that thing happen. I do not understand how the President does not have the authority or leverage to fire an employee at FEMA. (Granting the just cause argument.)
Please explain what conflict of interest would arise in the President directing his Secretary of Homeland Security to fire a particular employee or group of employees. Assuming he had just cause, of course.
The Secretary of Homeland Security answers directly to the President.>
My point exactly.
I'll assume you realize now although you didn't acknowledge it that the President does. Therefore the President would be the top of the hierarchy of the bureaucracy. This suggests to me that he indeed has the power to hire and fire at FEMA. Which you asserted he did not.
Could you please answer the question sir?
Yes, I know that I can look this up. Do you know what the Socratic Method is? Who has the authority to hire / fire the Secretary of Homeland Security sir?
Could you please tell me who does have authority to hire and fire in FEMA if the President does not?
Is FEMA not a government agency? Does it not fall under the executive branch? I'm really asking, I'm curious why he wouldn't have authority.
God, I hope not. You'd never hear the end of it from insufferably arrogant lefty political commentators.
Couldn't agree more. Courage and a sense of morality. She is not beyond saving.
Fair point. But I don't think that firebombing and justice mix.
No, it won't. What the Hell? Is this what we are promoting now?
What about it? Trump is pro-life and his Supreme Court overturned the federal abortion protection of Roe v Wade. The largest pro-life step taken in my lifetime, so why shit all over him?
Amen to that. We have been attacked on every level for decades. I pray for a turn of the tide.
It would look like what it always looks like: insults, then screaming (or petulant silence) then violence.
So it is real?