4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

yep. Gold diggers, or groupies. Every successful man has groupies.

3
Cuetardian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, he kinda did say it. But it was said during a private conversation, nothing more. I've certainly heard people, men and women both, say far worse than that in private convos.

4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

The short answer is that narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths (the difference is really only in degree and in how violent they're willing to get) have no empathy and therefore no conscience.

They can be very charming and and highly charismatic - think Bill Clinton and Hollywood stars - but they only see other human beings as things to be used.

They will keep you around only as long as you are useful to them, even if you are their employee or their spouse or their child or their parent.

Once you're more trouble than you're worth, they will start ignoring you and criticising you until sooner or later they discard you. They'll fire you, divorce you, cut you out of their lives and leave you with nothing - and never give it a second thought, while you pick up the pieces of your wrecked life in shock.

If you know someone who is often described as a "terrible person" or "cold-blooded" or a "snake," you're dealing with a narcissist/sociopath/psychopath. A person who has no conscience.

2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a serious answer for you, so you may want to at least consider it:

Every woman gets a very hard life lesson at one point or other: She gets the lesson that she'll never be enough for any one man, because no man really wants to have only one woman as a sex partner for his entire life.

Not even her.

Once that sinks in, it does a real number on a woman's head. It's hard to accept that no matter what she does, what she looks like, or what she tries to offer, she'll never be enough for the man she loves.

He'll always want another and another and another, no matter what she looks like or what she offers or anything else, and sooner or later he WILL act on it. And then he'll tell her it meant nothing and she should stop worrying about it.

Sure. It meant nothing to him. It meant everything to her.

The one thing she wants most in life is the one thing she can never have: She'll never be "enough" for the man she loves.

Men laugh at this, but it's dead serious for women. That's why neither side understands the other.

As a result, a lot of women spend their lives trying to prove that yes she IS "enough" and tries to outdo men at everything.

Some of them end up trying to live like men, being just as promiscuous as the men they see and thinking this will make them happy.

(That's why there is the screaming demand for easy legal abortion: So women can live as promiscuously as men without the consequence of becoming pregnant, which men don't have.)

Meanwhile, the men spend their lives laughing at such women and telling them how stupid and incompetent and ridiculous they are to think they could ever measure up.

And here we are.

2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly right. The eclipse itself doesn't do anything except let you observe an amazing natural event and experience the power of nature.

It's what the black hats are trying to plan in conjunction with it that is the problem. Making people terrified and unable to function is part of that, so tell your wife to stop playing along with that and giving the bad guys what they want.

Turn on The Weather Channel or Fox Weather. It's all a big party of eclipse watchers and nothing more.

4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

yes, our taxes are going to protect mass murderers and to support the crimes against humanity instigated by the Bidens, the Clintons, the Obamas, and many more in Ukraine.

1
Cuetardian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Feds came to grab the video evidence

The question is, why now? Was somebody higher up threatening to go public? What happened?

11
Cuetardian 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's all connected, fren. People like Epstein and Diddy provide the blackmail measures that keeps elections fake and tax dollars stolen. They're the enforcers. Get rid of them and it's one less brick in the wall (a very large brick)

4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the black populations 'wake up' (I am active on all the hip hop forums and gauging their reactions. They're going thru the stages of grief right now).

Please tell us more about what you're seeing - I take it most are in denial?

1
Cuetardian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not all of the royals are evil. The fact that the "good" ones are suddenly disappearing is a huge warning that what's left of British culture is in great danger, while so many here just sit back and laugh. You're missing the point entirely.

2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all of the royals are evil. Philip, Charles, Andrew, Meghan Markle, Louis Mountbatten - yes.

The late queen, William, Catherine, Diana - no. Even Trump got on well with the queen. They represent the crown, which is a huge cultural icon over there that promotes cultural identity.

Getting rid of all of them will just clear the way for the illegals to take over more than they have.

The fact that the "good" ones are suddenly disappearing is a huge warning that what's left of British culture is in great danger, while so many here just sit back and laugh. You're missing the point entirely.

1
Cuetardian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. I do not think the queen wanted that marriage at all but Philip was still running family matters at the time and the queen may have seen allowing the marriage as the lesser of two evils - the other evil being Meghan playing the race card as loudly as possible.

Harry is a fool and Meghan became his handler. They have no children, probably because the surrogates refused to sign them over. Meghan has lied about everything and it's too late for Harry to speak up about it now.

6
Cuetardian 6 points ago +6 / -0

All that will do is hasten the fall of the UK to the invaders they were dumb enough to invite in. You really want the UK gone, messed up as it is, and replaced by another Moslem theocracy?

4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sociopaths are always, always drawn to power in whatever form they can leverage. Being the head of a local church, or PTA, or HOA, is a good one because then you can sway and control a good number of people right around you.

And when you have no empathy and therefore no conscience, which is the definition of sociopathy, there's nothing you won't do to gain and hold your little scraps of power.

That's what you're seeing here.

9
Cuetardian 9 points ago +9 / -0

oh my god - I read this thread and about fell over when it was revealed who "Starchild" was - I remember when he died - and I would not have guessed who his father was - someone I met once and you'd never know -

these people are not who we think they are and so, so many of us are going to be crushed by the truth - though the children have it far worse than we do -

2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

how the psychopaths exploit various groups in order to further their own financial goals.

If we ever learn to recognize psychopaths in our midst and stop them from doing any more damage, things will change significantly. But not before.

4
Cuetardian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think there have probably been way more humans on the moon than we realize, and there are almost certainly a few bases on the far side. Humans have definitely been there.

However, I'm also prepared to believe that the video we saw of the first men walking on the moon may well have been faked/staged/recreated for public consumption, just in case something went catastrophically wrong or there were transmission problems.

view more: Next ›