Alrighty.
Glancing at your profile, it looks like you may mean what you said. In general, on Patriots when people use ambiguous wording like that, it's in reference to Jews as the easy explanation for all things wrong with the universe, in a format that stops the supposed moderation that would follow otherwise (I imagine .win wouldn't feel like Stormfront lite if it were that bad).
And while your lack of a denial on Jews being part of your implication suggests you're only encompassing more in your phrasing, I suppose you would be blaming more entities than just the usual pin cushion racial group according to your explanation, as is more typical of this site.
But then, I suppose I am on Great Awakening and not Patriots, so some variance should be expected. Slightly different set of tendencies to contend with.
Ignorant is you being unable to read 4 whole sentences.
If for some reason people are literally unable to create accounts there, that's a different story I'm not aware of.
Nonetheless, the reasoning I mentioned before is reasoning I have seen plenty of times. And I don't know that what you're saying is accurate on a large scale, or what those banned users got banned for exactly. That being said, for all those users, that's a perfectly good reason to want to use Nitter.
Because Twitter has been out of leftist hands (mostly) for a while now. Register an account and just use X. If for some reason people are literally unable to create accounts there, that's a different story I'm not aware of.
Most of what I've seen are people refusing to make accounts and demanding Nitter links because they want to deny the site traffic.
I can't understand why you're basically making a thread about how Elon Musk is raising awareness of what I assume you consider a worthwhile and important video to watch, and then immediately go out of your way to undermine the platform by linking to this 0 traffic alternative that was useful back when the site was run by actual psychos.
Are you implying that you aren't using [they] and [them] as moderator dodges to say "DA JOOS DID IT" like everyone else on this site that uses [them]?
If so, then I wholeheartedly agree with everything you're saying. If it's the usual placeholder, not so much.
Thanks, will look into this.
And no unfortunately, I'm not lol. I've been using Himalaya fluoride free toothpaste and fluoride free mouthwash for some years now (Tom's of Maine at the moment, others before that). But I currently have a cavity or two, from wisdom teeth growing in at an angle. Not really anything to do with fluoride, but as I'm in pain for the moment until I can schedule oral surgery, I'm looking all over for what to do about dental health going forward.
And I have consistently been seeing the suggestion that the problem with fluoride is ingestion, whereas topical use is actually a "miracle for your teeth", provided you're not a child still growing teeth of course. Hearing that even from some anti-fluoride sources, so I'm just not really sure right now.
For the moment I plan to go through the small tube of fluoride paste I got from my last dentist appointment a couple days ago if nothing else. It's a trivial amount compared to what I could be getting if I drank the stuff after all. Other decisions will be made later.
Any recommendations for what to grab to get this setup? We use water filters for shower heads, and our drinking water is Kentwood springwater. That's about it. Dishes use regular tap, sinks and so on. Probably should be more thorough.
Though I'm beginning to think I should probably use a fluoride mouthwash at least despite everything.
How do you people manage to attribute every evil in the world to one singular group? Don't you think the bs would be more believable if you at least attempted to limit your accusations to things you could prove beyond all doubt?
I think the point is that if him having said it as a private citizen means he's not immune, then you can't also penalize him on the basis of being President now. It's one or the other, can't have your cake and eat it too so to speak.
If there is a way to sue Biden successfully of course I'm all for it.
I honestly thought the same thing, then distractedly read half the thread without even checking the article until I got to a comment about breasts, at which point I realized I needed to re-evaluate what was going on here.
Then I actually thought for two seconds about the name and now everything makes sense again.
Fair enough, I have seen people saying there was never any definitive reason to expect things by the 4th.
But to clarify then...if nothing major (and I mean earthshattering) happens by Easter, then it should be assumed that something has gone wrong?
Is there a deadline (yes I know..)? Even a general approximation of "if x doesn't happen within this rough time frame, we can safely assume that things aren't moving forward as expected"?
Genuine question. The 4th was datefagging, apparently, so I'm wondering if there's anything resembling a real cutoff point left now.