All good discussion. I would say only that the acceleration may come from the fear of an approaching cognitive dissonance event, where the public compliance (and complicity) with the Narrative will disintegrate under the Awakening. I think we are failing to recognize that the strength of the Deep State is not so much having lots of tentacles, but in promoting a massive mythology based on Lies. It is very much a product of Satan, in respect of him being a Prince of Lies. And one of the lies that he/they depend on is the notion that they are in the majority. The Soviet Bolsheviks were based explicitly on this lie, calling themselves the "majority" when they were no such thing. We have to understand that this IS a lie, which means that they are NOT in the majority, but are standing on each other's shoulders to fill the empty suits they wear.
The key insight of movement and party politics is that it is never a matter of "trying to capture the majority," as everyone has been taught to think. It is a matter of assuring that YOUR minority is larger than THEIR minority. This makes victory much more a practical objective. I've tested this in union elective politics and it works.
How to prepare? Be ready to tell the truth about what is going on. But stick to the facts that are evident in the day. Don't go down rabbit holes and get obsessed with conspiracy theory. It is sufficient to make the case over facts that are well in evidence. Unwrapping the Covid-19 fiasco is a good example of how to proceed. Hopefully, Trump will be able to provide an unwrapping of the 2020 election fraud. We just need to be cognizant of these cases and their key points when explaining things to the newcomers. I say "explain" rather than "persuade." Persuasion is an uphill job, and demanding of people's patience. When they are mostly persuaded, but need assistance "connecting the dots," that's when explanation is both wanted and needed. If they don't give 2 cents over Khazars or Reptilians, it doesn't matter. If such things have any real relevance, they will be exposed in time.
You may have posted it, but posting is no credential of truth. The support of a Jewish homeland is not connected to Jews? (I didn't say anything about the proponents of Zionism). The connection to Satanism is interesting, if true, but how do you make that argument? I can't help but wonder what you make of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I like it when people present their credentials. It confers the respect due to reality. If I may ask, what is your Ph.D. in? Are there particular topics where we agree? Or disagree?
What "attitude"? How will they get killed? My family lives among Africans and they (the Africans) are a known quantity. It seems I am the only one here that has that experience, and nobody likes to hear about it. Your attitude is to use xenophobia to call foreigners "illegal rapefugee hoardes," which means you may get some other family killed with that attitude.
We know because people report that they do.
We had no problem leveling entire German cities in World War II and no one ever considered it a war crime. And it wasn't. It was the nature of war. When legitimate targets are mingled into the population, and the population suffers, it is on the responsibility of the government there to have avoided it. Especially when the aggressor sets the tone by first attacking population centers per se (as the Germans did in World War II, provoking the Battle of Britain). Hamas began a program of attack against peaceful civilians, so it is on their head that they will suffer in kind.
As for Mike Adams, your mileage may vary. I have found his disclosures to be so hair-on-fire and not backed up by subsequent developments that I have given up on them. I used to go to him for information, but have been disillusioned.
"Masonic-Zionism" is only a conspiracy myth, whatever it means. And it is not credible to think that a reference to Zionism is not a reference to Jews, since the two are historically connected. It also demeans Masons, and I take exception to that one as well. Do you know if Joe Biden has a membership card? If so, he has probably forgotten where he put it.
First, there is the problem that you get your "incontrovertible evidence" from Natural News, which is notorious for knee-jerk reactions and interpretations. But, second, you seem to think that Israeli government culpability in aiding Hamas as a political foil against Fatah gives Hamas a "get out of jail" card for mass murder. It doesn't at all. It just means that some policy-makers in Israel should be held responsible for the fruits of their policy. Hamas--the mad dogs---need to be killed.
The minute you bring up "Masonic-Zionist" claims, it turns to anti-Semitism.
Thanks for the clarification.
No head in ass. Tinnitus and hearing loss. My computer's speakers are not the greatest. I got the gist of what the driver was saying, though he didn't do much to enunciate. The person he talked to indeed did not know English. As would be the case if he were Congolese or Angolan. As I mentioned to another, it may well be that the woman of the house is the breadwinner, as that is an unfortunate pattern in African society. Or they are on welfare, which is a problem unto itself. Finding out the facts is superior to making them up in your head.
But where is your head, when all you are displaying is uninformed xenophobia? I'm not happy with people downtown speaking Spanish instead of English, but you tell me when I can round them up and deport them---or even if I can. The answer to that is to mandate English as the national language, and cease government support of other languages. We have a plentiful supply of Koreans as well, and they speak Korean among themselves. There are also some Ukrainians, and guess what they speak. Being upset with illegal immigrants does not give us cause to be upset with the legal ones.
And thanks, by the way, for the way you end your message. I remind you of the rule about civil discussion only.
Sadly, it is often the case with Africans that the women are the workers. We tolerate innumerable white layabouts... Black African layabouts are no different. (I'm not saying we should tolerate them, but it is racist to focus on one and not the other.) Finally, you know they are "illegal rapefugee hoardes" exactly how? By telepathy?
I was paying attention to the purported "invaders." Thanks for mentioning this detail. It makes the concern more credible.
But there is no way to tell the difference between an African who came over the border or one that flew in on a visa. Legal visitation and residence is not "invasion." I would expect, or demand, assimilation for anyone seeking to become naturalized citizens. Otherwise, we generalize racism into xenophobia. ("I don't like foreigners in my neighborhood.")
By the way, I have no patience or tolerance with illegal entry. Nor does my wife. We both are Trump supporters and wish for all illegals to be deported ASAP.
They do that for nuclear reactor containment structures, which results in a fortress. Any evidence that they do that for skyscrapers? You could say that, insofar as the collisions themselves were concerned, the Twin Towers withstood them. It was the fire that precipitated the collapse.
What is it you think I don't know about? Nearly every "truther" doesn't understand structural failure, so far as I have experienced. The presence or absence of the columns in the exterior wall doesn't really make a difference in what happened, since the core columns were also necessary to carry the building loads.
In the allegation that it is indiscriminate. The Israelis are known to communicate their impending targets to allow the occupants time to leave (this according to the son of Hamas' founder). They will provide a "tap" round landing on a building as notice that it is shortly to be shelled. They seek only to target known military forces, presence, or facilities---which are fully legal targets under the conventions of war, presence of civilians notwithstanding.
The conventions of war forbid the use of human shields, which is the chief tactic of not only Hamas, but also Ukraine. Hamas interposes roadblocks to prevent Gazans from evacuating areas announced to be attacked. It is also relevant that Hamas began this war with atrocities against men, women, and children. Israel is only fighting in response.
So, yeah. It is "indiscriminate" if you want cover for anti-Semitism.
"We need people in foreign lands to be blown to bits in order for us to have nice things." Only a depraved mind can think this would be a selling message. I hope it flops like Biden tripping over a sidewalk seam.
Just remember that Trump was very pro-Israel. Israel is an island of freedom in an ocean of tyranny. Should they be wiped out? No. Has there been shady business? Time will tell, but Israel should not be wiped out. So much for policy. We would all be better off with a private donation fund to support Israel. And an explicit policy against imperialistic Islam.
Nothing fake when the dead bodies start piling up and lebensraum is turned into desolation. You need to start using accurate language. It will help your thinking. Just because someone unleashes a pack of mad dogs on a neighborhood doesn't mean the neighborhood can ignore them and not put hem all down. And if someone in the neighborhood was in on the attack, grab him and try him as an accomplice.
As far as I can tell, this "false flag" notion is conspiracist code-speak for "They are all guilty. To hell with the Israelis." And thus, with moral equivalence, the victims become the aggressors. A tricky way to mask anti-Semitism with anti-Globalism.
I'm not sure I should be concerned based on this video, where the maker / narrator is not seen. It would have more credibility if the narrator was himself black, so the racial bias element could be dismissed. The audio was also poor, and I have a slight hearing impediment, so I really couldn't understand what he was saying. Were these men here legally? Were there women who were indoors?
Nearly every city has a large contingent of African nationals---green-card holders and naturalized citizens, often working in the medical industry as doctors, nurses, or other care-givers. The simple fact is that there is a widespread labor shortage in medicine and home care, and we employ foreigners because they are willing to come and take the jobs. (This is also happening in the United Kingdom.) My wife is such a person. Many work here to build up capital and resources, which they can then use to build homes back in Africa. Some are happy to succeed in America and have had children who are fully assimilated and would not want to leave. They are peaceful and inclined to keep their heads down. No reason to worry about them.
My point is that without additional information, one cannot conclude much about an African who is not very conversant in English. Some African nations speak French or Portuguese as the unitary language. Sometimes, the person has only spoken in their own vernacular and is now having to learn English on the fly. If the complaint is that some newcomers haven't assimilated, that is a blame to put on this administration, which is delinquent in that whole process. It can hardly be otherwise, when the national policy is to open the borders with no vetting or requirements for citizenship.
I am, of course, talking about legitimate immigrants, not refugees, nor illegal aliens. I would just point out that there is no way to tell the difference by looking at skin color or complaining about their English. And I don't like the murmurs of how we may need to take arms against them (e.g., "frogface").
Thanks for the photo. Very interesting. I had thought the building used the heretofore standard curtain wall approach. The windows (dark spaces) comprise about 50% of the wall and are non-structural. I presume the rest are columns (light-colored surfaces), which are structural, and carry vertical loads---along with the interior columns. They are not designed to withstand lateral loads (an airliner crash).
In any case, the collapse of the building was the result of failure throughout the column array, not just from the exterior columns.
What is your point?
They have always had access to weapons, for as long as I have ever heard news about the region. You might remember they have a coastline.
The exterior walls were mostly glass. That is the style of modern skyscrapers. They were not significantly concrete. The exterior wall had steel columns...among all the others in the core, which were holding up all that weight. There is utterly no mystery about this and I don't understand why I have to explain this to you like you are a child. Did I not give you the reference to the B-25 collision with the Empire State Building?---which was a much less serious event.
As for the building "still standing," I didn't catch that except on second reading. What possibly can that prove? We normally expect (for example) that automotive head-on collisions are terrible affairs with loss of life and mangled vehicles. But I was in one where I was essentially unhurt and my car had mainly cosmetic damage. So also, the other party. You can't draw rules from discrete events. There was nothing else like the Twin Towers event so far as I am aware. And the "still standing" building was only about 20-25 stories. The photo shows the fire department working to abate the fire. No possibility of that at the height of the Twin Towers collision. You are not making a logical comparison. The majority of professional opinion was that the collapse was understandable. As an engineer, I find it understandable. What more do you want? You don't seem to be approaching this as an engineer, or as one familiar with structures.
WTC7 also collapsed from columnar failure from an internal fire (innards first and walls last).
Good dig. I recall reading that certain stars (neutron stars, I think) become pulsars and emit strong signals along their rotational axis. The likelihood of detection would therefore be related to the coincidence of being within the cone of radiation. But there are more stars out there than we can see, so there is no shortage of cases that would work.
I recall the floors as concrete-clad steel trusses. The acted as blades to slice up the airplane as it penetrated into the building. So also with the columns. I've seen a rather appalling computer simulation of the 767 heading into the building as though it were a potato being diced.
The airplane did not encounter 110 floors, so I don't know what that has to do with the situation.
The vertical columns held the building up. Loss of strength would mean catastrophic collapse.
Yes, there were columns in the exterior wall, but between the columns was mostly window. It wasn't at all like a thick reinforced concrete wall. You really ought to read up on the 1945 B-25 / Empire State Building collision, only suggestive of the greater damage caused by a high speed 767. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
Unfortunately, "popular science" articles are written to a low intellectual standard, demanding something visual, and they have only cartoons to carry the burden. It would be better to think of it as a kind of schematic of what happened. The real data is probably a blip on a strip of graph paper (old school). Not very inspiring.
No connection whatsoever. We have received radio "signals" from space since the accidental invention of radio astronomy in 1933. No more weird than receiving visual "signals" called starlight. Many stars are observed to pulsate, and this is just another example.
It may be as simple as the possibility that he hasn't (yet) stepped on anyone's toes. That is often the way of politics. Even if you are not in league with someone, if they have always been courteous and fair in your experience with them, they could be very tolerable for a position like the Speaker of the House.
Heh. Limited to winning.