No that is the mo of obvious scam coins and if a political figure is involved with an overt rug pull of this scale that is a major problem.
So what do we think about Trump's secretary of commerce pick Lutnick also being one of the ones who miraculously avoided the attack?
Trump just brought it up in his press conference yesterday, saying Lutnick was always there at 6 am every morning and his company occupied the top 3 floors of the building, and that luckily for him for the first time in 5 years of never taking his kid to school his wife convinced him to do so.
He lost 100% of the people in his company there and had to rebuild his business. I think his brother might have died too iirc? But I found it interesting that Trump brought it up, and that he also said that Lutnick watched the plane fly right into the building as he was driving at 8:43 AM.
So are you saying that they are two different views of the same evil side of the coin? I just want to be 100% clear on what you are hinting at.
He isn't off though. I don't think in this board of all places we should be dismissive and shut down thought because it doesn't fit our theological paradigms. There is a lot of indications that Jesus himself indeed was a gnostic.
I don't think the selection of Yoda was something that was just unfortunately done. It was international from all I've seen. Iirc Yoda fits the visual description of the demon Alistair Crowley claimed to have made contact with.
What I think he is referring to "could be totally off" is the painting by Leonardo Da Vinci called (the Salvator Mundi), where if you look in Jesus's hand there appears to be a transparent orb that he is holding.
I find that there is a big lack in the understandings of the occult here. I myself do not pretend to have a great in-depth understanding of specific areas pertaining to it, but I have obtained a decent general amount of knowledge.
Wizards and Warlocks Q said.
There is much more for us all to uncover, and I feel like for a place called the Great Awakening we should see much more digging and and learning in this area. However, I do understand that putting the name aside the purpose of this place was always to be a Q-focused board.
One conclusion I have started to form is that despite the many different faces, at the end of the day all of the occultists are likely two sides of the same coin. You have a black path which emphasizes the physical and the animalistic urges. Then you have the white path that emphasizes the spiritual. All religions in the previous age acted as a sort of filtering mechanism or initial stage of initiation to determine who was ready to receive the true hidden knowledge.
Even the life of Jesus and his teachings are full of many occultic messages, and he likely hailed from a gnostic sect. Anyways that's just me trying to quickly pair down some of it into an overly condensed nutshell. Out of the house on my phone. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on this and if you have any materials worth reviewing on the matters.
Same I never anticipated this is where the rabbit hole would lead. Even though these occultists are known for depraved acts like this I still wasnt expecting it to be this bad.
This isn't getting enough buzz here. "She" might allegedly might be his father lmao.
That is a very reductionist framing of the matter though. Even within the non-denominational world of Christianity alone there isn't a single unified interpretation of biblical prophecy.
Not everyone is a dispensationalist, for example there is preterism where in a nutshell people believe that the 2nd coming already happened. Even now in the broader sphere of Christianity, there have been the recent conspiracies surrounding the Scofield bible's propagandization of the idea of the end times and the rapture.
Also, if you have studied the occultists extensively for a long period of time. You learn that they are obsessed with enacting their version of revelations. Their vision of the New World Order is centered around it, and a core aspect of the end times is the ushering in of the false messiah via a great deception and the administering of the mark of the beast.
So yes, while there is nothing I can do about what is prophesied. We don't all agree on the meanings of the prophecies themselves. And even if the dispensationalist view is correct, you wouldn't want to align yourself with those that are trying to usher this New World Order in.
I get that, but it's not just about his thoughts in isolation. It's about the concerns that come about when you start to see the pieces of the puzzle beginning to fall into place that make the exact vision he talked about possible.
There is a video included of him saying it. Also he describes 1917 as a miracle, which was the year of the Balfour agreement with the Rotschilds to establish the state of Israel.
And what does biblical prophecy say about peace in the middle east? Who ushers in this false peace? What is the America first agenda here?
There are so many cross currents and perspectives to examine things from here. I was a Christian long before I started to follow Q and this movement.
One supercedes the other for me and I think it is natural that us of that background are weary about certain potential red flags.
Do you not at least find it worrisome that Pete Hegseth has advocated for the construction of the 3rd temple, and that this move paves the way for that and other aspects of the book of revelations to line up?
Trump also said the number 25 like four or five times today.
He kicked it off to my knowledge by oddly referring to the United States 250th anniversary as the 25th x 10 anniversary.
He then said other things like Don Jr.'s faith increased by 25%, that something hadn't happened in probably 25 years, and I wish I made this comment while it was still fresh on the mind but mentioned 25 specifically another time.
I don't have the time right now to rebut each point. But I think it is crucial to point out that October 7th was an inside job with the intention of producing this exact result where Israel has an excuse to level Palestine.
Hamas again was created by both Israel and the US, go see what Ron Paul had to say on this matter nearly 20 years ago. Hamas does the bidding of Israel. October 7th is an event that is loaded with Israeli propaganda. It was an orchestrated event that served a convenient means to an end.
I have mixed feelings on it too. It doesn't help my gut feelings when Pete Hegseth has floated the idea of reconstructing Solomon's temple on temple mount in the past.
Dude he's talking about a mass relocation to other countries. He never talks about a mass return of the people. It is pure cope to extract from anything he said about them getting their land back after the rebuilding. Now if you want to debate that is the hidden motive, I would be more inclined to agree and hope that is the case. However if you go purely off of what he said, if you carefully listen there is no support of the idea of a mass return.
You have it all twisted. Their homeland was robbed from them by the Rothschilds and the Zionists. Israel along with the US then created Hamas and used them as useful puppets. It's insane how many people here on the "Great Awakening" are so clueless in regards to the evils of Israel.
And again, before that he said it's his hope that they won't return. They key context in what you said is that "world people" will be living there first and he really emphasized people from all over. Then after adds that "Palestinians also"
Order and context matters. There's no way for the entire population of the Palestinian people to populate that area along with outsiders from all over. The area isn't that big. This likely means a minor subgroup of probably rich Palestinians will be of the few that can return.
Israel is the genocidal maniac.
He never said temporary. Those words never came out of his mouth. He said it is his hope they don't want to return.
That is not the only place he spoke about it, he also referenced it here: https://www.youtube.com/live/2lrE5knT4eY?t=2913&si=xOGA-g3g3hk2nLVG
He said it is his hope that they could do something really nice "as in relocating them" to where they wouldn't want to return. Goes on to expand upon building them something nice in the other countries.
It all hinges on whether 1) it even happens, and 2) whether he will actually let them return if they wish to or not. If they are not allowed to return then I see this as wrong.
And do you think the Zionist cult is any better?
I am not sure at this point, I will wait for the story to develop more before I make any claims. What is being alleged currently is that:
Who knows, there's so many possible angles to this.