3
DueProcessFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

His roommates said He did not have strong opinions on politics but he did have strong on abortion. His Hit list was a list of Democrats with abortion providers as well.

According to local news, he texted him his roommates this morning.

I made a lot of bad choices and I might be dead soon

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is basically the equivalent of a magician doing misdirection some you don't see him palming the card.

It's razzle dazzle. He is flat out wrong (I would say lying) about what these executive orders mean. Several things he points to are unconstitutional.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

But honestly, he is spot on when it comes to pointing out military law and things if that nature. I haven't found anything he said or pointed to in this regard specifically, to be wrong or bullshit.

Really? What has he been spot on about?

His basic MO is to point to something that actually exists and then a complete 100% BS explanation for what it means.

He clearly wrong about laws and orders over and over and over again.

There's a reason military lawyers exist.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Omg. An announcement! Several years ago. Followed years later by an earthquake!!!

Those poor golfers

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the point of your "predictions?"

The stuff about the Israeli embassy is probably due to the fact they just bombed Iran.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

No way the SS could have not put someone on that building.

Inside Job implies the SS knew about Crooks. Zero evidence of that.

The plan was that building was being secured by local/county police. Secret Service were guarding the inner perimeter. Cops were IN the building next door. But not on the roof. It was a local screw up that Secret Service should have fixed because they were responsible for the whole plan. Basically it was a very insecure venue because it was outdoors. But outdoor venues are cheap.

an no way was it scrubbed clean an hour later. It was a crime scene

What do you think happens to crime scenes after they are processed? They release the scene. The scrubbing happened AFTER the crime scene investigators got everything they needed.

Just like there was no way security put kennedy in a car without a bubble and then slowed down to drive through Dealy plaza. Turns out the doubters were right.

The decision not to use the bubble was from politicos around Kennedy. It was a political decision. He wanted to be seen.

He even stopped the car to shake hands in Dallas.

He routinely didn't use the bubble and the bubble was plastic. It was not bulletproof. It would not have stopped a full metal jacketed bullet

Previous JFK motocades DC

https://www.loc.gov/item/2022634965/

Buffalo

http://www.forgottenbuffalo.com/images/600_Pulaski_Parade_4.JPG

Springfield, Illinois

https://www.thecaucusblog.com/2019/10/cold-war-tension-comes-to-springfield.html?m=1

So what were the doubters right about?

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's wrong with you? Kids have to be abused to create those images.

Memes? Are you kidding?

Of kids they already have in a database, meaning the photos are already stored with authorities.

I have no idea where you are getting this from. But it's bizarre.

So the kids should continue to be victimized by having their abuse traded around because the pics "are in a database"???

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

On the location of the shooter.

Not sure what you mean here.

I have read other things on this and it just seems to be people who WANT TO believe some great plot rather than people evaluating evidence.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is super goofy. The whole point of America is you can protest.

This seems like a Russian talking point.

Many many folks on this board have gone to rallys and protests put on by tax exempt organizations. Many folks have donated to them.

Like this one

America First Legal Foundation is an IRS-approved section 501(c)(3) public charity. Your donation to America First Legal Foundation is tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

1
DueProcessFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

This woman claimed NBC was hiding a film that showed Lee Harvey Oswald was seen outside the Texas School Book Depository at the time of JFK's assassination.

Then at the hearings she was chair of, she didn't even ask about it.

Turns out far from being hit and it had been on YouTube for years. And we have known for 60 years Lee Harvey Oswald was not in this film.

Oswald himself claimed he was INSIDE the building at the time of the assassination

2
DueProcessFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Farmland should grow and raise American agriculture — not be covered by solar panels.

Why?

We need both food and energy.

We have enough capacity to feed a population of 450 million.

What's the issue?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›