Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

261
HOLY FLIP FLOPS‼️‼️‼️‼️ LISTEN CAREFULLY TO WHAT WAS SAID LAST NIGHT BY SKY PRESENTER : “unless Kamala eats a baby she’ll be democratic nominee”. The Whitehats are priming the normies of what is coming. There is no way this news presenter who works for MOSSAD MSM made a slip up like this, (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by Joys1Daughter 1 year ago by Joys1Daughter +261 / -0
67 comments share
67 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (67)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– DeepDMingDeep 33 points 1 year ago +33 / -0

Translation: unless the proof of Kamala eating a baby is made public…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RandoMando2A 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Are we sure “eat a baby” is not some kind of foreign slang or saying that doesn’t literally mean eat a baby?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– zepster 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Maybe she meant to say a dingo ate her baby.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lordnigel 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I have lost my fiancee the poor baby!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– kish-kumen 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Damn it all, now I just wanna go watch Oz play guitar while hanging with peeps at The Bronze.

Plot twist though. Regular-town America actually is Sunnydale. The evils that don't add up? The normies just rationalize away in their minds.

"Eating babies? No one would do that!"

Truth had a funny way of slipping into media even if Hollywood progressives try desperately to keep it out.

And that werewolf, Oz? He bailed on his witchy girlfriend who thereafter turned into a lesbian.

His name was Seth. Still is. But it used to be too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Saltyarmyanon 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

“Unless Kamala Harris decides to eat a baby” 🤔 wow that’s some slang I’ve never heard before. Wonder what that’s supposed to mean. Why would someone even say that?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– M42D 33 points 1 year ago +33 / -0

Kamala did collude with Planned Parenthood selling baby parts to order in CA, so not far off actually.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Egg_sammich 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I remember planned parenthood selling baby parts. I did not know kamala had a hand in it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– M42D 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

In very brief terms, as DA she went hard after citizen journalist David Daleiden who was working on an expose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Strelnieks 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Odd. You'd think if she did that she would have unanimous uniparty support.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Retaining_H2O 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Let Kamala be chosen the Democrat candidate in their August convention.

Immediately afterwards, Trump can challenge Kamala's candidacy to the Supreme Court. She is ineligible by law and doesn't meet the Constitution requirements to be president. She was never born as a natural citizen of the U.S., which is a legal requirement. There is no way around it.

The Democrats will waste time making Kamala the candidate... and then in September they will have to name a different ELIGIBLE candidate instead. That new candidate will be too late to get on the ballot in many states, and too late for mail-out ballots in some states.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– photobuf 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

The Constitution says she is eligible. She was born in the US even though her parents were not citizens. The 14th is pretty clear.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Based_in_Space 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Actually 14th is not clear. I believe White Hats may use this issue to overturn the US v. Wong (anchor baby) decision which wrongly interpreted 14th. For instance American Indians were not recognized as citizens until a law in 1920s well after the Wong decision even though they obviously were born in US. SCOTUS also never made decision with respect to Article 2 meaning of ‘natural born’, only the 14th. Could conceivably wind up with 2 definitions of natural born one for birthright citizenship for anchor babies and other for presidential eligibility. But preferably they would overturn Wong and make natural born mean Jus Sanguinis

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HenryBowman1984 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Her father was working for the Jamaican government. Her parents were not USA citizens and were ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of Jamaica. Not the USA. Therefore she’s not eligible.

Many articles and arguments have been written about this. Also the Federalist Papers detail this. It’s ridiculous to think anyone can spawn on USA soil and that spawn be classified as a citizen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– photobuf 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

They are Democrats working for the Cabal (Spectre of the Bond series). They do what they want. Look at Barry!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LogicCircuits 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There was an exception made specifically regarding the citizenship of Indians

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Saltyarmyanon 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Trump has mentioned he wants to end “Birth Tourism” so I think you’re right on that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– FishinGuns 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Can you quote the legal definition of “natural born citizen” in the 14th Amendment, as you so justify as “pretty clear,” for us?

Given the propensity of the Supreme Court to take on such things lately, and actually rule justly, I’d consider not speaking in absolutes - but that’s just how I roll these days…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

The "definition" was decided on by the SC in the Supreme Court’s Wong Kim Ark decision, only Congress has the power to change it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

It will be up to Congress to override The SC to clarify if someone born to "alien" parents is a citizen so guess what, they won't do crap! Don't kill the messenger, I am just saying what the current system allows.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FishinGuns 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That precedent doesn’t define “natural born citizen” definitively…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Donny_Fiasco 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

This again?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They keep beating this dead horse and he ain't gonna win no race! SC ruled on this already! Supreme Court’s Wong Kim Ark decision

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

need to be natural born citizen, not just a citizen. very strong argument that both parents need to have been citizens before she was born to qualify as natural born ants hence qualify for office

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– photobuf 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That argument went before the SC and they ruled in favor of the plaintiff. We may not like what they ruled but the only way to change is is Congress so we are pretty much screwed on that attack mode!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

We MUST have an uncompromised Congress! Thanks fren!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

are you referring to Wong? that wasn't on point legally if my memory serves

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– photobuf 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yes I am and they will use it to argue the point regardless of what the SC's meaning was. If it ever goes to court!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I look forward to the day when the 14th is overturned...the way it's being interpreted was never it's intention.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– photobuf 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The SC made the wrong ruling on this in Supreme Court’s Wong Kim Ark decision but only Congress can change it so this battle plan against Harris is going to fail. Her merits should be enough to get her UN-elected! Keke

permalink parent save report block reply
View 2 more comments
▲ 2 ▼
– DIAFhillary 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

This seems like the most plausible and likely scenario.

GWP already has a story that in Wisconsin you cannot take Biden off the ballot unless by DEATH. So since he hasn't died yet, he's still the (D) in WI.

Nevada and Georgia had similar rules.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SurelyShirley 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

So what happens if someone still votes for him? Just tossed?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DIAFhillary 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think every D voter should write in Joe Biden :) Don't let them tell you No to Joe lol!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Deplorable_Badger 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The intent of the voter shall come into play here since it is a vote for a Democrat. Rules and laws are for Republicans only.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllOuttaBubblegum 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And it shall be Hillary.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Based_in_Space 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

You notice Trump has mentioned Hannibal Lector in a few of his last speeches?

Seems to be priming population to reveal of cannibalism etc

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

POTUS mentions him often at Rallies .

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllOuttaBubblegum 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

This is very strange. Also decoding symbols has broken down Silence of the Lambs, Lector, Buffalo Bill and Buffalo Bills as deep,deep comms. Many times.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TaQo 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

What an odd thing to say ....

Many truths are spoken in jest...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Good ol' Shakespeare!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Steviewoodski 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I see what you mean and it is odd, but I also think this is a foreign reporter using a shock phrase. Fingers crossed it priming of a sort.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

https://twstalker.com/argosaki/status/1815316021424820410

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– usernametaken4 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Biden: "I plan on being the candidate, unless I have a medical reason!!" 24 hours later: covid. Newscaster: "Kamala will be the nominee unless she is found eating a baby!" 24 hours later....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– tool 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Fuck. That's weired.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Qtoad 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Ya that’s really weired.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GodLovingPatriot 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The main stream left makes fun of us for adrenochrome and eating babies. They laugh at us for thinking this. It's In tv shows and movies now. Mocking us.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 15th_dimension 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

sky has been redpilling since they came on the scene. plan.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Sky is the only UK media that's not mockingbird that I'm aware of...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– rayw_wwg1wga 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

But it is owned by Rupert Murdock the guy behind mockingbird fox news

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Joys1Daughter [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I was wondering if he still owned it...could it be under WH control now?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yldngo 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Guard you babies everybody!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Excelsior 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

This is listed as a Parody account. 48 hour rule applies

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– UberLightBringer 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Sorry folks, but buckle up. There's a reason they asked you to put your trays in an upright and locked position. Start doing digging on why "natural flavors" are listed in just about everything processed...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kunkussion 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Or the opposite; priming to ridicule anyone that would believe she's done it. The same happened with Hillary and Podesta with Comet ping pong.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Chimera 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That's Sky News though. They're very pro Trump.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Maroon 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– EDC1745 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

what an absolute awful & weird thing to even mention. i've never heard anybody say something like "unless so & so EATS A BABY"

wtf

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– makemyday007 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Well I guess that means Hillary is out.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Striker1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yikes—cue the video… but then none of them could run and wouldn’t that just throw things into a sh$tstorm!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jamezelo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

gets caught on camera eating a baby*

She's definitely part of the adrenochrome club. But I mean, hey keep that horseface's feedbag full because if THATS what she looks like with her fix i dont wanna see how bad it gets without it. Look what happened to that gargoyle Ellen

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OrdinaryUser42 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Kamala Harris is suffering from the kuru, prove me wrong!

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy