Putin sees his anti-NWO coalition taking shape.

FTFY

Then it will be a good lesson in discernment for them.

A right: that which you are owed by others.

The only right you have is to be left alone and not have others infringe upon your person or property. Most of the Bill of Rights consists of specifications and variations of this fundamental right.

Sorry, now you have to pay a doctor $200,000 to surgically implant a train into your kid’s stomach. If the kid dies from complications or self-harm, then it must have been because you’re a train-phobic bigot. Them’s the rules.

In some weeks from now, more than 1 but less than 3…

Post 365 provides the map and the markers. 367 and 368 provide an extra perspective.

No, later. Dec 7 - 17 is the 10 day period iirc.

Ummm, the Dec 2017 drops?

Q made it fairly obvious when you read what he wrote in context.

The 10 days darkness thing was later confirmed by Q to refer to an 11 hour power outage at the Atlanta International Airport in Dec 2017.

Anyone telling you that there will be 10 days “of” darkness involving a govt shutdown or national power outage has not read the drops.

Also, this timeline constructed from end time prophecy indicates that the Antichrist’s covenant with Israel, and therefore the new Temple sacrifices, don’t start until after the Rapture and after Damascus, Russia, and Iran are wiped out.

https://barrysetterfield.org/Tribulation_Events_Timeline.html

This article details why the Antichrist might come from Turkey and points out that most of the soldiers involved in the destruction of the Temple, while led by Romans, were Syrians and Turks.

https://barrysetterfield.org/Cyprus.html

the Antichrist comes along and fixed all the world’s problems.

I’d like to see a scripture reference for that.

how can he make war with the saints if the saints have been raptured out?

1. It will still be possible for people to be saved during the Tribulation, except for those who took the Mark.

2. Many Israelites will be saved during the Tribulation, as God uses this time period to draw Israel back to Himself. The Antichrist definitely makes war with this group.

Your reference to Christ talking about the abomination of desolation comes from Matthew 24. He urges his listeners to pray that their flight from the abomination not be on the sabbath. Therefore Christ is talking to Jews, not Christians, as the latter do not observe the sabbath as the former do.

Tribulation is persecution, wrath is God’s doing.

Then all of the Tribulation period is God’s wrath, as it starts with God sending various plagues and disasters, persecution is rarely mentioned outside of Antichrist’s persecution of the saints, which as you correctly note happens after the Abomination is set up, which is halfway through the Tribulation.

I’m curious about what a “dimensional” body is, and where in Scripture you get this from.

Neither, Nostradamus made predictions just vague enough that future events could retroactively attributed to him. It’s the equivalent of saying “wars and other bad things might happen in the future”. No duh, Sherlock.

I don’t think Clandestine is being dismissive of all Christians; only those who insist that their interpretation of biblical prophecy is correct in spite of all the evidence contradicting said interpretation.

Bible-Thumpers do not equal all Christians.

I would actually blame the Bible thumpers in this case, as anyone claiming that a person today is the Antichrist shows their ignorance of prophecy.

1. The Bible nowhere states that the Antichrist brings about or even seeks world peace. World domination perhaps, but not peace. It should be obvious that this alone disqualifies Trump from being the Antichrist.

2. The AntiChrist is not known to make any peace deals save the 7-year covenant with Israel that lets them rebuild their Temple. AC then betrays Israel halfway through the Tribulation, takes the Temple, and sets up worship of himself in it. This again is completely outside Trump’s character.

3. According to Daniel AC goes to war with Egypt at least twice during the Tribulation.

4. This is a bit speculative, but Daniel might indicate that the AC is from Turkey.

5. The AC doesn’t make his deal with Israel and doesn’t show up on the world stage until after the Rapture. If you’re a Christian alive today, you have nothing to worry about regarding the AC or the Mark.

Anyone shrieking about “insert person here” being the Antichrist, they simply have not read the Scriptures; same with those trying to predict the day of the Rapture. Can you really blame Clandestine for getting fed up with the false predictions?

What’s funny is that the Bible never says that the Antichrist brings about world peace. The only treaty that the Antichrist will make is one with Israel that will let them rebuild their Temple. After 3.5 years he then betrays Israel, takes over the new Temple, and sets up worship of himself in it. Meanwhile, he goes to war with Egypt at least twice according to Daniel.

The Antichrist won’t even be revealed and won’t make his deal with Israel until after the Rapture.

A couple things to keep in mind:

1. There are many people who took the first jab, then saw through how ineffective it was and refused to take any more. Most of my coworkers are in this camp.

2. We don’t know for sure yet exactly how much the jabs affect reproduction relative to how many doses each person took. It’ll probably be a couple more years before that can be ascertained. I think that most people who only took one aren’t going to be affected this way, at least not permanently.

3. We don’t know whether in the future cures will be found for people who are injured or sterilized by the jab.

To put it simply, while only 30% didn’t take the jab at all, there are a lot more than that who only took one and won’t fall for it again. They will stand with us purebloods against future medical tyranny. And while some of the side affect data doesn’t look pretty, I don’t think it’s bad enough to collapse civilization.

The road ahead will be rough, but we’ll pull through if we get back to what made this country great.

I wish everyone would shut up about this until Desantis makes a public announcement. All this speculation is a useless distraction.

Nope, Q confirmed it was Maxwell.

The first arrest was Maxwell. How many times to do we have to say it??

Because they’re such cowards that the big, loud, scary guns terrify them.

Remember that one “male” journo who said he got PTSD from trying out an AR? That’s the entire LGBT community.

Two possible reasons that I see:

1. Donating to RINOs who won’t fight back against his agenda.

2. Donating to actual MAGA candidates to try and trick us into not voting for them.

Don’t immediately discount a candidate just because a leftist donates to them. Watch what the candidate says, does, and supports. You’ll be able to find out who’s MAGA and who’s not real quick.

His reaction was probably due to frustration from idiots asking him stupid questions like this.

If you take a serious look at the things you think you know, and put them through as rigorous a shakedown as you have with Morpheus11, you'll likely come to the conclusion that you don't actually know anything.

1. Morpheus has not demonstrated any rigor whatsoever. He randomly assigns different psychological stressors to different cancers while providing no explanation or evidence. Then when I called him out on this he kicked and screamed like a child and accused me of shilling for the establishment.

2. Saying that examining my beliefs will cause me to realize I don't know anything is an utterly meaningless phrase. Saying that we can't know anything isn't an argument. If YOU are going to make an assertion (like germ theory being wrong), it is YOUR duty to provide sound arguments and evidence. And to date no germ theory denier I have ever debated has done this. Their sole argument is "Come on, bro, you can't possibly trust the establishment", which in addition to not being an argument is an inversion of the appeal to authority fallacy.

Once you let go of beliefs, a whole world of possible explanations comes into view. Sometimes, crazy explanations appear, but they're only crazy because of lingering beliefs.

Whether an idea is crazy is subjective, flat earthers think that a spherical earth is crazy. I do not judge theories based on whether they're crazy, I judge them based on whether they have supporting evidence.

Morpheus11 might have been more inclined to share more of his thoughts with you if you had been approaching him in a genuinely open-minded, curious way, but you were being confrontation instead. I get it. It's crazy stuff. But that does not make it wrong, it just means your beliefs are being challenged.

Firstly, I asked Morpheus multiple times to explain the exact mechanism behind his theory and articulate any evidence in favor of his theory. To date he has provided neither. All he had to do was provide one paper, from any person of his choosing, that explains the exact mechanism behind how psychological states cause cancer and contagious diseases, and show a controlled experiment that supports the theory.

Secondly, asking for evidence and rational arguments is not being close minded, it is being rigorous. Any theory should stand up to scrutiny, but all he did was accuse me of being afraid of new ideas. Furthermore, when I showed evidence that opposed his notion that viruses don't exist, he dismissed this evidence on the sole grounds that it was "establishment propaganda", which is being truly close-minded.

Thirdly, he made clear that his definition of "open-minded" meant "agree with me without question". And he required this complete subservience before he deign to explain his position. That is not science, that is a cult.

Lastly, I do not mind my beliefs being challenged, I welcome it. But any challenger must come with facts and logic. Random accusations of "your an establishment shill" and "you just need to be more open-minded", along with refusal to acknowledge opposing evidence, I do not tolerate.

How does his model that psychological states cause cancer and pneumonia make any sense at all? He literally stated that if a woman has excessive anger because her husband divorces her, it causes hepatitis. When I asked him how on earth this works MULTIPLE TIMES, he only doubled down on his assertion and did not provide any evidence or an explanation of the causal mechanism at play.

Same thing when he asserted that fear of starvation causes liver cancer. When I asked him why liver cancer specifically and not some other malady elsewhere in the digestive tract, he failed to address that too.

Perhaps germ theory is accepted as true because 1) we can directly observe bacteria and viruses with electron microscopes, and 2) because germ theory does a better job at explaining how contagious diseases spread. Everyone knows from personal experience that disease spreads regardless of the psychological state of the people involved, yet Morpheus for some retarded reason denies this.

I don’t have a problem with people who propose ideas that are counter to mainstream thought. I myself think that the Bing Bang model and macroevolution have serious problems. What I do have a problem with is people who propose theories without evidence and without explaining the actual mechanism behind their theory. I also have serious problems with people who dismiss contradictory evidence solely because it supports the “establishment” instead of their own pet theory. Unfortunately flat earthers and germ theory deniers do both of these things, so I’m going to call them out on it.