I'm not saying you hurt my feelings idiot, I'm saying your argument is an actual fallacy and is adding nothing to the conversation. I'm going to assume you come from Reddit judging by your lack of self awareness.
Trump reposted a lot of people who were obvious plants and shills. He was even on Alex Jones and we all know he is a shill as per Q. He reposted her talking about the election, specifically. That doesnt mean he supports her other claims.
lmao ok dude, nice gaslight thanks for wasting my time. enjoy your catnip
Except you didnt take any of my points and just said "this is illogical" and tried to say i was saying things i didnt (you asserted i called her a liar twice and i didnt) and then you go and say you dont know who we are talking about and want me to research for you (and in the same breath say you are thinking logically and im not).
You dont mention my points about her adding nothing to the convo and just relaying information, you just say "you arent thinking critically" which is absolutely ad hominem and not an argument or point and adds nothing to the conversation lol.
Look up what ad hominem means and reread this very post...
Thats not at all what I am saying.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.
Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.
Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.
The ad hominem doesnt help your case by the way.
I mean, we already say "the media reports this so its probably wrong" as it is.
Charlie is someone who was very wrong often, so why would I listen to someone who repeats what he says?
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value just because we're desperate to fit it into our narrative of "patriots in control" (they are). If it can't be proven, then we should absolutely be careful with the information given. Few people will wake up if we feed them bunk even only 25% of the time.
edit: and let me remind that people like Charlie pretend that they are in contact with Trump and team and working with them closely.
Yep, he is shitposting. These kind of comments drive [them] up the wall. It's really funny.
Unfortunately for him, and many like him, the definition of lying includes omitting information to purposely deceive.
Did this go anywhere?
Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter.
Saying something with the intent to mislead is textbook definition of lying. It doesn't matter if the statement is true or not, what matters is the intent and that was to mislead.
Italian/Catholic
Congrats. You fell for the strawmen.
Q literally says UFOs are put out as a distraction. Sorry.
Improbable he would go out of his way to do this considering it is irrelevant to every other post, never referenced again, the "Rosswell breaching" strawman all over the MSM, and his only other post regarding aliens is that its put out as a distraction.
Consider the context of this post. It's from a Q&A, and the random question/topic was from a random user just wanting to know Q's thoughts.
Getting an experimental vaccine for a "virus" with a 99%+ survival rate warrants an "I told you so."
Bingo. Keep seeing the same copy-pasted "mistrial!" screeches.
Pretty much copied and pasted by all of the bots on Twitter as well.
Should have done due diligence prior to voting for this clown.
I mean, again, who should Virginians have voted for? You act like he was the true evil one, but they both quite obviously were.
Get him out....start the movement now.
Agreed, but again, that's because he was elected with no other choices. How is what mattered, obvious who didn't given the choices. Attacking the people who voted isn't going to help anything, just further divide an already divided people.
If the system was rigged, then it didn't matter? If it wasn't rigged, then we had no one else to vote for?
So who should Virginians have voted for? I don't necessarily think it was about who wins, but how they won. If they weren't able to cheat, then that's a win. We've shown we can easily primary RINOs, so hold his feet to the fire. They work for us, not the other way around.
Perfect for hot tenting.
Edit: apparently this comment triggered a bunch of bots lmao
Frank Miller, who worked on the 300 graphic novel, was one of the earliest examples of the left "canceling" someone over their own opinions in their art. Which is ironic, since they are also the ones who will dismiss all disturbing ritual images of Lady Gaga because "muh art."
Just go to r/comics and mention Frank Miller and you will be botted to hell and back about what a horrible person he is for making "not batman" beat up a bunch of middle eastern thugs.
Shall we play a game?
We already knew about the gold dude. We are specifically talking about 650 planes. Everything else is moot. Where did she get "650 planes" from? She was on Charlie's show... coincidence?
She is military and doesnt know what REAL ID is, she already claimed she was part of Trump's transition team, has a history of saying she is associated with Overseas Republicans when they had to send her a cease and desist when she left.
Never said she lied, she just has a lot of answering to do before I trust her. The media not questioning her on basic things is a BIG red flag to me.