An adversary makes threats like that because they don't control the other party.
I've always called her climate goblin. I like doom goblin better.
Blue Wave of newly-minted democrat voters.
Speed.
the Biden bus? The Biden residency has a certain "help, I'm being forced to do this and have no control" vibe.
Nothing burger. Their complaint is that the test/preview instance of website didn't give initial test users a copy of all the [back end] source code.
This claim relies on the specious assumption that the 'must give source code' clause of the licence is enlivened by the act of making a test site publicly reachable. That's not automatically true.
It's from the Law Of War.
11.3.2 Duration of GC Obligations in the Case of Occupied Territory. In the home territory of parties to the conflict, the application of the GC shall cease on the general close of military operations.
In the case of occupied territory, the application of the GC shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such State exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the GC..."
stock tips from retards are worth every cent you pay for them :-)
"You'll get everything you deserve."
filing this for a 'that didnt age well' meme.
So much panic they come across as foolish and pathetic. It's like we are watching a move.
Found this article about how EP works in USA. It's from 2008, a paper about EP written for the australia senate, who were concerned that the underlying legal issues apply everywhere.
["Legislative Power and Executive Privilege in the Courts"]https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/pop49/courtlegislativepowerandexecutiveprivilege)
tl;dr summary: the law is not settled. Courts have tended to leave EP as a political matter between legislature and executive. However the judiciary is the sole arbiter of whether EP is justified. Trump asserting EP means congress cant prosecute trumps staff for contempt of congress since they are properly following orders.
Congresses' remedy is to sue people in a minor court first, to adjudicate whether they can obey trumps orders or not.
Patriots are in control. NCSWIC has it all
I mean Trump will be elected in a landslide in the first democratic election after the cheating has stopped. This result will confirm the 2016 result (when Q stopped the cheating) and show the people how serious the cheating was.
Q+ may or may not return to act as president before then, it doesn't matter for the movie plot.
I posted this in 'how do you think the movie ends' thread:
The Q campaign turns out to be a wide scale Cyber Defence operation to defend the country from stolen election attacks. We're now in the Cyber Incident Response phase. The swamp's capability to cheat has been destroyed, which was the first objective. Second objective is for the Cyber Incident Response Team (Q, space force & NCSWIC) to find and prosecute the attackers. This will be done quietly with no leaks.
ln 2024 Trump is re-elected because the cheating has been stopped. Then Trump presents Q to the public. The Closing credits roll over Mark Dice voicing Brian Stelter's reaction to muh people can't walk down the street .
The Q campaign turns out to be a wide scale Cyber Defence operation to defend the country from stolen election attacks. We're now in the Cyber Incident Response phase. The swamp's capability to cheat has been destroyed, which was the first objective. Then the Cyber Incident Response Team (Q, space force & NCSWIC) investigate to find and prosecute the attackers. This will be done quietly with no leaks. ln 2024 Trump is re-elected because the cheating has been stopped. Then Trump presents Q to the public. The Closing credits roll over Mark Dice voicing Brian Stelter's reaction to muh people can't walk down the street .
Thanks fren. I can't un-imagine that image.
This is a win because the background story is:
5 years ago Australia signed a $90 Billion contract with a french company to build diesel submarines in South Australia. The PM at the time was Malcolm Turnbull - a rich socialist who took control of the conservative party for a while.
At the time the deal was criticised for 3 reasons:
-
obsolete weaponry. Committing our navy to having only retard-submarines for the next 50 years, whose side is Turnbull on?
-
it was seen as pork barrelling to buy popularity for SA senator Christopher Pyne, whose support Turnbull needed to hold on to power
and
- it pandered to the green-left's phobia of anything remotely nuclear, and used that pandering as political cover for....
a long term program to siphon off tax-payer's money through the military-industrial complex
Sound familiar?
Trump just undid that and arranged for real submarines to be based in the area. Apart from the money, Trump just neutered whatever skullduggery Turnbull may have been up to for China regarding weakening Australia's military capability.
With 4 'rona vaccines, the probability that at least one vaccine will be recalled is 4/3.
quote: "If you haven't been vaccinated … there are people in the community who have every right to say to you, 'I have to protect my staff in terms of occupational health and safety.'"
but what are you protecting your staff from?
this fool's reasoning only makes sense if the vaccine doesn't work.
Not necessarily. An attacker could bring their own dhcp server and the host will boot on whatever DHCP config it receives first.
Google turns up this prophetic gem from 2016 Straight.com
From Q+ himself.
They report it so confidently; like the leftard media really, truly believe their own bullshit.
Not suspicious. They archived Trump's whitehouse.gov website and made a new site when resident Biden took office.
D is for declass
Hes right, because only lefties get anxious about wokeness. Sane people think wokeness is stupid; our emotion is more amusement, tempered by frustration at having to work with such foolishness, than anxiety.