Where did the original video come from? Cant find it on lockheed's pages
edit: grok found it https://x.com/grok/status/2014873700944793952
Fire all of them and dismantle the IRS
If a task force is needed for mass audits of congress, or H1b, or anything else, then a temporary task force is authorized for explicitly that, with very specific conditions on continuance.
Dismantle the IRS immediately. We do NOT need to wait on these other problems to clean themselves up before we try and get rid of the IRS
The only problem is the agents are being used on citizens. I want absolutely no taxes or IRS agents to exist because of "good intentions".
The ENTIRE IRS was built on "good intentions". It was ONLY a 1% tax on the top 1% of people. Thats how they sold it.
I dont give a SINGLE FUCK what the irs agents are there for. Thats just whats being used to SELL us on having 86000 IRS agents.
Right? Something tells me that an official first hand testimony from Clinton (who everyone KNOWS was on the island, not even the left deny it), live in congress, testifying about Trump also being there on the island, would be significantly more effective in taking down Trump than simply hoping he arrests you and gets taken down by discovery
y.com doesnt do anything anymore, a few years back when you went to y.com it just had a single letter in the top left: "x"
last year, y.com redirected to x.com
now it seems to be doing nothing :( hopefully elon didnt sell!
Got a good chuckle outta this one and felt the need to share 😂🤡
Also, shoutout to this random granny for posting on Threads like shes not in one of the wokest places on the planet 😂
Common sense is derived from within, you cant outsource your thinking to AI. It really seems like you are just completely outsourcing your thinking process, and I urge you to exercise caution. You are very rapidly hardening and shaping your opinions using purely external sources of thinking.
You offer no rebuttals to any form of legitimate criticism of your usage of AI, your replies are always just misdirection and projection
The problem there is musk owns y.com 🤣🤣🤣
They would need to convince musk to sell y.com to them, which he would never do 😂😂
No, it just means digital ID is a requirement for the platform.
The platform is designed to push people towards digital ID, its not designed to keep people safe from bots. Thats a misdirection of orwellian proportions
That is ridiculous lol. Nothing like humans shortening something to make it quicker, actually making it longer instead
I always say "dub dub dub" for www
"Real people, real conversations"
There it is- just a way to get more digital ID bullshit passed under the guise of keeping people safe from bots and AI.
Its gonna be branded as such a noble ordeal - the platform to end misinformation. NO bots, NO AI. All you have to do is digitally sign over everything you own to us... so that we can verify you, on W of course.
Even if he did, a random tweet without sources is not a source...
A leak to notify the wh at X about shadowbans? You do realize that the owners of an app own the app right?
Apps run on data - that data is owned and controlled by X, aka Elon. He literally has all the data. Why would he need to build an ai bot to access data he already has to give him data he doesnt have?
Grok didn't have access to this data unless someone gave it access.
Correct, but with a caveat - its not real data. You can tell because this is not how data is stored. Data is not stored in plain text human readable language, its integers, strings, bits (booleans). Also, assuming its real data, the people who could give grok access are the same WH who you claim gave grok the access to view the data. If they can give access, they can see the data themselves.
Grok is larping, and humanity is showing itself to collectively be completely fucking retarded when it comes down to how technology functions, especially AI
What Grok does definitely have access to is all public tweets. Which is why its capable of larping like this. You think its accessing some internal system to see that youre shadowbanned because of antisemitism, but what's really happening is it views your tweets, determines you dislike jews, and then filters all of that through 1tb of training data to filter out a response that makes contextual sense. This person doesnt like jews - thats called antisemitism - this user is an antisemite- im tasked with role-playing to give the user internal info - here's how that internal info would look assuming that hatred of jews means antisemitism, and assuming society doesnt tolerate people like that, etc
Its larping
Is literally a he
Is it legal to run the plates on someone stalking a federal officer? Yes
They do have nukes, dont forget that. Its precisely weak leaders that are more likely to respond with nukes
The added context is helpful. Still an interesting coincidence on timing, perhaps Trump knew of their planned exercises and has ramped things up just in time to use the planned EU missions as news coverage and making EU look weak to the people by the sudden "withdrawal" that was already planned
It doesnt matter how weak or how strong, it absolutely would ignite a world war to attack europe
Glow harder
More like a pathetic little chihuahua, no need to put it down just kick it away and carry on
No need for ww3 you glowfag
This is a CNN interview
What exactly would they sue for?
Everyone who's shamelessly addicted to AI say the same things.
You're just not using it right, you just havent figured it out yet. Clearly youre not a pro at this like I am.
You dont get as animated as i am without a solid grasp on AI. Ive been a software developer since before it existed, and im still one now, 5 years into this AI mess. (The concept of an LLM has been around a lot longer than 5 years; but 5 years ago is when the first commercially viable model was released)
Ive integrated AI into my daily life. I use it every day, for what it is: a tool. Its running practically 24/7 during my workday - ive got it writing unit tests, executing them, fixing them when they break. Ive got it refactoring code into shared services, writing some front end code. Its pretty damn good at insanely specific tasks.
What it simply cannot do, is handle the human element. Leaning back and thinking; dissecting requirements for a feature, then deciding what to do and where in the code to put the feature. It cant understand what a human needs, it cant understand what a human feels, it doesn't understand any humans viewpoint or worldview, which is why it fails at implementing a feature that works end to end in the application. It doesnt understand what makes a user interface tick, or what's intuitive for humans
I dont use AI to form my opinions. My opinions are my own, they didnt get formed for me, or hardened, or refined, or whatever it is you want to call what youre doing here. The AI is not built for that. Its not capable of understanding the world or understanding humans.
You "wrestling" ai into submission, is you simply forcing it to validate your beliefs. Its a form of hedonism, really.
u/#q4964