28
JTS047 28 points ago +28 / -0

And just like that… an empire built on phallic spitting comes crashing down… who knew?!?!

4
JTS047 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh No! How’s she gonna gain an audience to sell her poop yogurt?!?!

1
JTS047 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly! I made this same comparison just the other day. They need to sweep through these next couple years like the Earp brothers and Doc Holiday, wiping out the Cowboy gang!

3
JTS047 3 points ago +3 / -0

All these disgusting weirdos just trying to go viral.. For what - they don’t really care.

5
JTS047 5 points ago +5 / -0

This time… it’s legal!!

15
JTS047 15 points ago +15 / -0

Very disappointed in my Senator on this one. Hoping he’ll see his error. This is no time for half-measures. We MUST retake the Republic and we can’t have lukewarm middle of the road people in any position of power.

12
JTS047 12 points ago +12 / -0

Am I the only one who keeps thinking about the part in Tombstone, when Wyatt Earp and the boys make their last charge to take out all the “Cowboy” gang? That’s what I imagine/hope we see with Trump and his Avengers over the next couple of years!

2
JTS047 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump should take this opportunity to codify the number of Supreme Court justices NOW, while possible, so we never have to worry about Libs packing the court in the future!

40
JTS047 40 points ago +40 / -0

This is basically a tax on “unrealized gains”, which is what the Dems are pushing for on all forms of investments. Unless you’re already one of the elite who can hide your wealth, then it will become impossible to build wealth over time - which is exactly what they want. They want a population dependent on the government teat, which ensures an electorate that will keep voting for “free” stuff.

1
JTS047 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh boo hoo… they knew who he was when they picked him in their primary and still chose him. I feel ZERO sympathy for them. They only want a re-do now because of 2 reasons:

  1. they now know even the blindest of people saw from the debate that he has zero chance of beating Trump in a fair race
  2. by hand picking someone this late, they avoid any inter-party squabbles/competition that may bring out unsavory facts about each other that Trump could then use as talking points

In the end, whoever they hand pick, D-voters will fall in behind. You’ll get your guaranteed votes of minorities, unknowledgeable people voting how celebs tell them, the elite, suburban women with white guilt, etc

4
JTS047 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, it kinda seemed like they did in previous seasons, but something changed. They went basically full-on woke, conservative bashing this season. I quit after 3 or 4 episodes. The story (probably for the same reason) has sucked this season too. I’m done.

1
JTS047 1 point ago +1 / -0

So I guess morally objecting to being the instrument of a corrupt deep state “run” by a falsely installed senile puppet would qualify anyone with a brain for conscientious objector status, right?

3
JTS047 3 points ago +3 / -0

I totally understand wanting to profit off of your work, but I have always wondered why nobody has programmed/arranged a literal “dead man switch” - a sequence of events (auto email blasts to every publication in the Western World) along with paper letters in the hands of trusted individuals with instructions on what to do if you “die suddenly”. That’s what I would do if I had that kind of info and wanted to make sure I had a chance to take down the cabal, even if from my grave.

8
JTS047 8 points ago +8 / -0

They are pretty Willy-nilly with the way they use the word “secure”. First it was “Secure” the Election. Now it’s “Secure” the border.
I’m thinking in the Democrat world that “Securing” something has zero to do with protecting something and safeguarding it, and more about deciding what you want to happen and then making that happen through whatever illegal and immoral means it takes.

30
JTS047 30 points ago +30 / -0

Hopefully they personally sue into oblivion the leaders of the current DOJ that allowed this criminal act (unlawful imprisonment) to happen, and then let the new DOJ under DJT to prosecute the them criminally and/or militarily!

7
JTS047 7 points ago +7 / -0

I am starting to wonder how they could prosecute me if I simply didn’t pay my federal taxes. After all, they are using my money to commit crimes - so by paying them, I’m aiding in the commission of a crime.
Of course that only matters if we had courts and a DOJ that cared about the actual law.

1
JTS047 1 point ago +1 / -0

Partially right… Democrat politicians - Evil Republican politicians - Mostly Evil

Democrat voters - Stupid AND NAIVE Republican voters - Less Stupid possibly even more Naive

3
JTS047 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve essentially said the same forever. When Dems are in charge, they try to take away our rights, impose draconian regulations, and ruin the character of our nation. Then when Republicans take back over, do they claw all those changes back and send us even more in the right direction? No.. at BEST they pause our continued slide into chaos until the Dems take back over. Ever notice how they are somewhat interested in “impeachment” when they know there is zero chance it will result in anything meaningful from the Senate or DOJ? Yeah we’ve been fooled for far too long.

1
JTS047 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, no fren… no argument… just clarifying/thinking out loud

5
JTS047 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is breaking their oath to preserve the Constitution a crime?

6
JTS047 6 points ago +6 / -0

Looks like it could maybe win a D measuring contest with Big Mike

4
JTS047 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okay, so if that’s anything like Presidential impeachment, it would take having majorities in both houses of Congress for that to work… even if you could “prove” extreme dereliction of duty, Dems would NEVER vote to impeach a lib judge

view more: Next ›