2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do you think it’s been detailed?

If what you think was the original plan was allowed to continue uninterrupted, what do you think works be so different, ie worse, today?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but nor did Op Trust exist in a time with phenomenally intelligent AI and supercomputers. Also, the utility of your electronic devices cuts both ways - data is a huge market and not for nothing.

All those personalised ads you see? All those times you’ve been having a conversation and something you mentioned all of a sudden is being advertised to you? Cambridge analytica? Noah Yuval Harari declaring that free will is over because humans are hackable?

All of the obviously manufactured ‘movements’ that spring up using real people by Intelligence services? The evolution of psychological operations?

All of the things you think benefit you on your quest for truth were created by, and for the benefit of, those who wish to control you more closely.

What’s more, they doubtlessly have far more sophisticated tech for all this stuff than any of us are even aware of.

Cuts both ways. They are most definitely NOT still stuck with the technologies, capabilities and doctrines of the Operation Trust days. Technological advancement is not a one way street in your favour - you only have the surveillance and influencing devices that they put before you and convince you through imperceptible marketing ploys that you must have. I bet everyone here is glued to their smartphones most of the day - me too. You think that isn’t by their design and for a purpose?

In fact, they are far more capable of pulling such a thing off now than they ever were whilst humans remain every bit as susceptible.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cheers. Does the whole gist of that Q drop therefore remain a mystery?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was anyone ever able to piece together the less cryptic, less speculative questions amongst this lot?

Like, did anyone identify the MI who was relieved midway through BOs term and its relevance?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

By big deal he means that this was some type of business transaction?

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Albert Pike wrote it - it’s from his book MORALS AND DOGMA. It’s on the front page.

Also there have been 33rd Degree Masonic whistleblowers who have attested to it and also infiltrators who have disclosed it.

Also, if you believe that there exists such a group of people in this world who do worship Lucifer and who do kill and even eat babies and that they are elites of our society then you must have at least a suspicion of Freemasonry.

The Grandmaster of the lodge of England is royalty. George Washington was a Freemason. The city built in his name is a topographical and architectural homage to Freemasonry. Or do these elites somehow escape the finger of suspicion because you have a preconception of Washington as a hero, in accordance with the historical narrative peddled by the very same people?

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if you’ve read the posts with an open mind but come to different conclusions?

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It looks to me like it’s possibly the Duke of Wellington who defeated Napoleon but I guess that wouldn’t make much sense from an American perspective.

Could it be Washington? He also wore those types of hat didn’t he? In fact, that painting of crossing the Delaware looks like that, no? Sans the horse of course. It will depend on where he is I guess

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Donald downward triangle communicating in symbols that he is a gender con and has a fanny.

He is communicating there that he, along with the likes of Blair, Merkel, Kirk ‘n’ Owens et al, are indeed the complement to the upward pointing triangle folk, like Jay-Z Beyoncé , la Vey and co, showing that both are complementary aspects of the Star of Remphan

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

But if we’re watching a show and these are all actors then he is only ACTING like that. He wants to mislead people into believing that he is backtracking. But to what ends…

6
Jacobin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Conversely, it’s easy to make generalities ‘hit’.

It is the very premise of things like psychic cold readings and psychic predictions/horoscopes

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

This helps prove that WWII was a big genocidal sham designed to eliminate the good peoples of Europe.

Nazis and Commies are the same people at the end of the day.

Kay Griggs said that the Soviet Union has never been Americas enemy and that was all just a put on.

What an incredible mindfuck to try accommodate.

We know Stalin was a mason. We know top Nazis were masons although no evidence of Hitler in particular being one.

We knew that Stalin, Hitler and Freud and possibly some other notables of the time all lived within a mile of each other in Vienna in the post WWI years and likely drank at the same coffeehouse.

Somebody mentioned the Rothschilds and it is argued that Hitlers father was the illegitimate offspring of a Rothschild when his mum, who was staff at a Rothschilds residence, fell pregnant whilst in service.

So who had infiltrated us all more? Nazis or commies? Two sides of the same coin really. All socialism.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kash will never admit it unfortunately, even though Q always says that people should just ask directly.

What Kash is doing here is like a guy having regular casual sex with a girl he doesn’t want anyone to know about - he does his bit to keep her feeling as though she’s acknowledged but really he’d never declare her his girlfriend and will simply deny it if asked.

He’ll try to get away with not answering this I’m sure but, if pressed, he will do all that he can to avoid confirming it, because he’s embarrassed to be poking an ugly chick who everybody knows is easy and doesn’t want to ruin his reputation..

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are the one saying that there’s nothing wrong with Albert Pike and that Freemasons don’t worship Lucifer on those levels. But how them do you contend with this quote from Morals and Dogma?

LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls ? Doubt it not!

4
Jacobin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not mistakes whatsoever and don’t consider this a win.

Not a mistake, very deliberate and calculated. The MOD have been called out on this stuff publicly a good few times now - they only hold their hands up to weather the storm before going right back to what they are doing - which is ousting white men from the services so that they can build a forces of women and ethnic minorities, whom they have brainwashed into considering white males as less than human and an enemy and cause of all their misery. Eventually they will use their new armed forces having trained them in the concepts of Critical Theory ie Marxism to do what you know what they want to do - atrocity!

Fair play to the Gp Cpt who refused to follow that order but it’s a damn shame she resigned as more of that type of moral courage it’s needed inside.

If she just leaves then it is in some way ceding territory for bloodthirsty Marxists but it’s understandable.

Don’t be taken in my calling or a mistake though - nothing could be further from the truth.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›