That kind of makes sense, but the demo video had speckles evenly spread across it, although I get that it was closer to the source.
I dunno, something about that element seems off to me and I can't explain why. It certainly suggests radiation as per the demo, it just feels like I'm missing a component that should be obvious.
Your explanation about the intensity relating to the light source etc. would mean there should still be speckles at the edges of the screen, just not as many, since there is also light hitting the edge of the ccd, just not as much as from the source of the blast.
Does anyone have an explanation as to why the speckling effect seems centered around the blast itself rather than across the whole frame?
Bear in mind that the ccd sensor in the phone is tiny and a radiation wave is pretty even, especially compared to something like a laser, which has an area of intensity, a scattering effect around the edges which reduces the futher out you go.
It was interesting that the short clip at the end of the first vid didn't show much speckling, but it was only short ans then I realised they didn't have line of sight to the point of impact, meaning the radiation was being blocked by the buildings.
This supports the radiation premise, but I'm not sure why in the other videos the speckling is concentrated around the point of impact. Wouldn't that imply an area of effect more akin to a laser than a wide area field such as a radiation blast?
Ask HR to clarify your position in writing in light of your signed contract. Don't ask anything else and don't supply your opinion.
Ask them to supply their answer within 10 working days as you require the written confirmation to present to your legal counsel.
If your contract is as you say, HR will make the whole thing go away to avoid an issue with the court, as otherwise you might be able to sue.
So, no-one can tell her that Ukraine has no freedom of speech and no democracy, because they'll mute your voice.
This MEP was talking on behalf of those who elected him to that position, so this is suppression, pure and simple - which is the purview of dictatorships.
Israeli tech firms are so embedded in our infrastructure it would take years to remove them, assuming there was even the political will to do so.
In 6 months time this will just be another story, no-one will believe it can happen to them.
The real question is, what will it take for the current generation to reject the false promises of the internet as it is today?
The things you describe have always been with us in one form or another (drugs for example) but the internet has massively accelerated everything.
One of the main challenges is that it offers easy solutions (that actually aren't). Until people wake up and realise that life is essentially other people it's going to be hard to get them to understand anything else.
So, are they getting to pick one to use on each other?