Trump is laying down some red pills. He isn't holding anything back.
"[the Democrats] say they want to defend your Democracy, it's a bunch of bull shit, that's what it is."
Then unfollowed everyone on his twitter.
Part of me thinks it's Ezra Cohen Watnick
Right on cue (q).
The format of the aggregator site is exactly what you're asking. That's the answer. Look up what an aggregator site is first
The plan is all coming together. o7
If you hit the link on the aggregator site’s post, it will link you to the original TruthSocial post… which you can’t see if you don’t have an account.
No, it's an aggregator site. In fact, it is one of the aggregator sites for Q posts. It's showing you the text and attached content but in the aggregator website's own format. It's on there to make it easier to find. Otherwise, if you don't have a truthsocial account, you won't see it.
Kash Patel was with @q today on TruthSocial.
Devin Nunes has 'retruthed' a 'truth' from this @q account.
Q also joined TruthSocial BEFORE Trump and Nunes.
Would make sense.
It’s always been my dream to watch the hedge funds experience an extinction level event…. And I’m more excited as of late that it may happen in our lifetime.
Is that you Elon? Name checks out.
I think people are missing what's happening. The SEC, although not trusted, passed 'transparency' laws when it comes to dark pool trading. Whether we believe it to be honest or not, the question is, why did the SEC pass that now?
Well, the DOJ is apparently looking into short selling which will eventually lead to the SEC either being woefully ignorant or willfully complicit. So even though it could be theater, the interesting point remains: now taht short selling has become a topic of contention and clearly the public is starting to understand what short selling is and how it's connects to hedge funds... it will become very clear that the regulators had not had the best interest for the public which is their duty and obligation.
Hopefully the DOJ takes action but I believe, if honest, what they'll actually find is that the SEC is the one who ultimately needs to be investigated.
Social media followers compared to their voter count.
-GME holding Citadel's feet to the fire
-SEC voted for transparency laws (Hmmmm... I wonder why now)
-DOJ is investigating short sellers... which will eventually turn their sights to the SEC.
... interesting.
It depends on when the article was written. Information is public. You can find their numbers anywhere, at any time.
Makes me think of this old gem, Trump vs Stoltenberg:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpwkdmwui3k
"Germany will have almost 70% of their country controlled by Russia, with natural gas" - DJT (2018)
There are a few theories. I don't think that applies to Canada. I believe it applies when information is spread on TruthSocial and swamp are unable to control it's spread since TruthSocial doesn't utilize AWS or microsoft cloud servers, they have their own. So Amazon, Microsoft, etc. can't pull the plug on TruthSocial.. the only option will be to take the net down.
For people asking for the 'source'. You can find multiple sources. These are hard numbers. It's public info. If you have to ask for a source, then you're not doing what you're here to do: your own research.
Alternate source: https://www.financialmirror.com/2020/10/29/trumps-social-media-army-7-times-bigger-than-bidens/
original pulled from reddit. alternate source:
https://www.financialmirror.com/2020/10/29/trumps-social-media-army-7-times-bigger-than-bidens/
Correct but this is a legal agreement for terms of service.
Copied text above
Copied text above
People on this forum have to stop with putting others into perceived boxes - this even means who we assume black hats and white hats to be. You don't know so stop guessing. We already gone through this on the boards years ago.
Take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Just put the pieces together and prepare for either outcome. There is no use guessing and Q even suggested to refrain from making public statements based on what you WANT to happen and associating it with Q.