Strongly considering that this may actually be a sort of switchback culling; as in, make a vaccine that is risky as all hell, so that you can get the least gullible people to not take it. We know they don't claim it's effective against coronavirus, so perhaps it was designed to prevent cases of an altered hyperlethal coronavirus? Once it is apparent everyone that will be is vaccinated, they can release the new strain, killing everyone not vaccinated, culling the skeptics from the population, and validating the blind obedience of those being vaccinated.
Every time I consider it I am inclined to believe it is more correct. This may also tie into Trump's public statements or stances on the vaccine.
Honestly, this situation increasingly seems like the most likely, and it is by far the most strategic position for them to chose. They have nothing to lose, and they put us all in a position where we must chose between two impossible evils: subject ourselves to whatever fresh hell is in the vaccine, or die, and be unable to save others.
God I hope Q can reign this in ASAP. Every day we get closer to not having much left to save.
Said this above to someone else, but don't lie about vaccination unless you absolutely have to. Lying makes it look like more people are doing it, which puts more pressure on those standing alone against it. Be honest and give them the finger; they have no right to force you to take it, or even to get an answer if you have or not. That might not stop them, but if they break the law you may stand to get a lot of money out of them.
^ don't lie about vaccination unless you absolutely have to. Lying makes it look like more people are doing it, which puts more pressure on those standing alone against it. Be honest and give them the finger; they have no right to force you to take it, or even to get an answer if you have or not. That might not stop them, but if they break the law you may stand to get a lot of money out of them.
Why is that a bright side? Trend shows it will likely be greater than a 2/3rds majority getting it. I know a lot of Trump supporters that have gotten it. The devastation that would be wrought by that is astonishing.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. There is evidence to indicate it has the capacity to cause significant harm. There is not extensive proof in this matter; proof doesn't matter in this case, as the concern isn't what the "vaccine" actually does, but what it might do (considering knowing what it actually does is years off, maybe lifetimes).
The "vaccine" is dangerous not because we know it has a high rate of lethality or the likes, but because it is an unknown.
Where did this post ever say or imply that "everyone is the same"?
Equal rights and responsibilities does not mean "everyone is the same"; it means judging everyone by the same stick of merit, not by unchangeable factors. It recognizes that even if statistically someone is more likely to be x, there are exceptions to that statistic, and therefore, logically, justice lies only in judgement on an individual basis.
Individualism is fundamental in Christianity and in Americanism; we are not created equally (as in identically), but we are equal in our rights and responsibilities. Therefore, all are to be held to the same equal measure, and treated respective to the results. Americanism takes that a step further, and provides us with equal opportunity as well.
We have basically no data or research to base any sort of conclusions about this on - that's exactly why pushing a mostly-untested vaccine on the populace is such a dangerous proposition; survivability rate could be 99.999 or it could be 0 (depending on time scope).
We don't have animal tests to go off, we don't have other similar therapies/vaccines to compare to, all we have is preliminary data that suggests a startling number of people seem to have died correlating to the vaccine. Does that mean the vaccine caused it? NO! Correlation is NOT causation (incidentally the same reason Covid survival rate should be significantly higher).
The vaccine is risky because it's a massive unknown. Getting solid data about it is astronomically harder than getting solid data on Covid, which is already hard enough.
Don't forget Putin was KGB
The thing about Putin is that he, by all appearances, serves himself. That puts him in a position of likely wanting us to win; if we lose, it's him versus the Deep state, and, unlike us, the DS will not just let him be.
I mean I believe that's been done, the biggest thing is a lot of folks (and rightfully so) won't believe it if they don't do it themselves. That's a big part of what the scientific method is all about, a big part that 21st century science is intentionally neglecting.
Originally, the method was devised by a bunch of smart and interested people communicating by letters and vising in conferences to have debates. Most experimentation had to be done by a person and their friends, and the findings had to be verifiable to the other people there.
The plane stuff would be great but the barrier to entry is a lot higher than grabbing a friend, a few sticks, a pair of levels and meter sticks, and a bike or car to drive out in some direction.
Here are some of the things I more quickly found:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/08/28/10-times-googles-far-left-anti-trump-bias-was-exposed/
https://loomered.com/2019/06/06/google-purges-engineer-who-exposed-company-political-bias/
https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/30/google-docs-prove-tech-giant-is-lying-about-its-leftwing-bias/
Some of these are duplicates, of course, but the picture painted is crystal clear: Google, and it's subsidiaries, consistently manipulate search results, as well as flat out removing/censoring conservative content. This was first significantly discovered in 2016, but it was widely suspected beforehand.
It is difficult to truly test the extent of bias in the results. Given that they utilize machine learning as well as a pay-to-play SEO system, each person's results will be different. Either way, the inside communications leaked show that they do have an intentional and direct manual override of some of these results with the aim of censorship.
There are some first-hand experiments you can do to test it, but of course, those will have a limited/marginal accuracy due to the already existing distortion mentioned above. Try searching for political things on both duck duck go and google, and try and observe the differences.
You can also look into YouTube's direct and obvious censorship of history; it's not exactly the same, but it is yet another form of direct meddling.
If that isn't enough I can dig around more and get you more; It's been a while since most of this first happened/was first discovered and I don't have a lot of the links on hand.
Grab a friend, two sticks, have one stay in one place with your friend while you drive a pretty good distance away (you should measure the distance directly from point to point) out and plant your stick in the ground. The larger the distance the more precise your results will likely be. Use levels to be sure that you PRECISELY angle them directly up. Both of you measure the shadows, at PRECISELY the same time. You will find they are not the same. Utilize some Highschool-level mathematics to calculate the angle at which the light has to be from the stick to be creating each different shadow. Extrapolate that angle to find that the Earth not only cannot be flat, it also cannot be a flat-ish "dome". It can effectively ONLY be a globe, and you can figure out the size of said globe surprisingly accurately utilizing this (comparatively) basic math.
Don't trust the science. Verify it for yourself and you will see that, if performed correctly, this experiment and the accompanying math will 100% prove that at least the portion of the earth you have observed has that curvature.
I may have missed a few details, but that should largely work. I'm sure there are ways to make the math simpler.
Here is a video detailing someone else performing the experiment. You can follow the same steps to observe the same results.
In addition: another thing to look into: artillery aim tables. Long-range enough artillery pieces account for Earth's curvature.
Weird; Flynn endorsed Lin Wood.
This is actually way more surprising than most of what I've seen today, could spell a lot of things out?