Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

331
The survival rate of the virus is 99,7%... ? Research Wanted ?
posted 5 years ago by ormoths 5 years ago by ormoths +331 / -0

...what's the survival rate of the vaccine? Not the survival rate of the virus after the vaccine, the survival rate of the actual vaccine.

60 comments share
60 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (60)
sorted by:
▲ 30 ▼
– TheConservationist 30 points 5 years ago +30 / -0

Too early to say ... mid-to-long term effects are obliviously unknown, at least to us.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Slyver 24 points 5 years ago +24 / -0

The survival rate from the vaccine data I have found is about 99.99%. The survival rate for CV is about the same (99.99% or better) across all age groups, when taking out all the auto accidents, cancers, flu etc. that are counted as "covid" (its better than 99.7%).

One big problem with the vaccine data is, as TheConservationist has said, mid-to-long term effects are unknown, and there is precedent in previous coronavirus vaccines to be very concerned about such effects.

In addition to potential longer term effects, and covid deaths being overreported, vaccine deaths are almost certainly underreported. If I had to guess, I would say it is likely deaths for the vaccines are 2 to 10 times greater (depending on potential longer term effects) than actual covid deaths now that we have good therapeutics (vitamin D + zinc + Mg and HDQ or Ivermectin).

This is only an educated guess. There really is no way to know since we have known bad data, and this is an experiment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– GodWins_76 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

The problem with RNA delivery systems is the have been shown in previous trials to cause immunity disorders and reproductive issues in the long term. This is why the FDA would not approve them and still hasn't approved them. They were released for use under emergency conditions.

Death is not the only factor to look at. Watch Dr Ryan Cole. He does a great job explaining RNA delivery systems.

Also, here is a list of deaths and injuries so far: https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/how-many-people-are-vaccines-killing

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HolySmokes 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Wow, thanks for the link.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Slyver 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

the have been shown in previous trials to cause immunity disorders and reproductive issues

Please provide sources for these claims about the nano-delivery systems (PEGylated lipid nanoparticles) themselves causing either of these issues (not the coronavirus vaccines). These are two separate claims, the first of which (long term immune disorders) sounds mischaracterized from what I have seen, and the second of which (long term reproductive issues) I have not seen any evidence.

I will look up Dr. Cole.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– JackANorey 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0

You see the dude whose skin fell off? OK he didn't die, but having ones skin completely peel off is pretty scary shit

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Slyver 16 points 5 years ago +16 / -0

Ya. I didn't even touch on the severe effects part. When you dig into that the severe effects (that don't result in death) appear to be substantially worse for the vaccine than the virus.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– Judicator 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0

We have basically no data or research to base any sort of conclusions about this on - that's exactly why pushing a mostly-untested vaccine on the populace is such a dangerous proposition; survivability rate could be 99.999 or it could be 0 (depending on time scope).

We don't have animal tests to go off, we don't have other similar therapies/vaccines to compare to, all we have is preliminary data that suggests a startling number of people seem to have died correlating to the vaccine. Does that mean the vaccine caused it? NO! Correlation is NOT causation (incidentally the same reason Covid survival rate should be significantly higher).

The vaccine is risky because it's a massive unknown. Getting solid data about it is astronomically harder than getting solid data on Covid, which is already hard enough.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– VforVendetta2021 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

VERY intelligent argument, this...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Jabron661 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

When I see the government and media working together to push this vaccine SO hard, I just have to think they want this DNA alteration in as many people as possible.

I don't know if they want it as a genetic marker, or they can use it as a way to control population, or some other nefarious purpose.

Clearly, as will all things like this, many people are getting rich off of it as well, which might be one of the motives, but when they are messing with DNA, I tend to lean towards some end result that will help usher in the NWO or the Great Reset in some way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Dardar 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

All true.

I find this utterly amazing, the very same folks who poke fun at believers and mock people of faith as backwards for refusing the shot are themselves eagerly lining up to receive their "article of faith" an experimental injection.....a complete unknown. The irony!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GrannyPaine 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I was just saying this at lunch! I'm picturing people walking up to others like some sort of deranged Jehovah's Witnesses and saying "Have you let the Vaxx into your life? Oh blessed are those who come in the name of Johnson & Johnson!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– M42D 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

US 'deaths' are 550,000 or so.

Survival rate of 99.7% is not disputed.

Therefore, 550,000 is 0.3% of total US 'infections'.

Therefore, total US 'infections' must be more than 270 million.

That means well over 3 in 4 people must have 'had C19'.

Does every 3 out of 4 people you know had C19?

Ask your friends ?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

That means well over 3 in 4 people must have 'had C19'.

Meaning we've reached herd immunity eons ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Pepe_Loves_Haggis 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

Yeah, but everybody knows that Math is racist...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– VforVendetta2021 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Math to the rescue once again! Long live factual arguments!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tristan 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Survival rate of 99.7% is not disputed.

Survival rate in high income countries like the US is lower due to the higher average age.

In high income countries, the estimated overall infection fatality ratio (IFR) is 1.15% (95% prediction interval 0.78-1.79).

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/207273/covid-19-deaths-infection-fatality-ratio-about/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AnonymousFrog 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Those numbers are not credible. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw9Ci2PZKZg

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

And I say that as someone who thinks anti-vaxxers are retarded

I'm an anti-vaxer, and I'm as far from retarded as you're likely to get. So there goes that.

(Also, just for fun...English has no double x. One x is plenty...relaxing. Two is kind of...taxing. But, I certainly wouldn't want to fight over it...in an actual boxing match over "doxing" and "vaxing", I'd be easily outfoxed :) OK, sorry

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mcmurdo32 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Upvoted for the English lesson.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Cheers :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Recyclops 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

A man spontaneously human combusted after the J&J shot.

https://nypost.com/2021/03/30/mans-skin-peeled-off-in-reaction-to-johnson-johnson-covid-vax/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SophiatheCopt 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Am I the only one who find this ironic, guy has Steven Johnson syndrome and he got the Johnson and Johnson shot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– OldSoulPatriot 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I always thought spontaneous human combustion cases were typically caused by severely drunk alcoholics inhaling pure oxygen and smoking cigarettes - I mean what could go wrong with combining a highly flammable material with ample oxygen and an ignition source?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– swimkin 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Apparently the very nature of the J&J shot can cause increased cancer risk. The synthetic protein could block the ability of one's immune system to kill off cancer cells. (Dr. Tenpenny)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– SgtPepper29 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

So you're sayin there's a chance......!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inquimous 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Here is the crux of all the arguments on both sides. Each sees different gambles and has different preferences due to what odds they are interested in.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– killerbunny88 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

CDC says 99.987% I believe. And that's with all the fudging of the numbers/tests etc. Who knows what the actual figure is. And that's the # for everyone. If you're older or have health issues it's slightly lower, if you're young and healthy it's higher. For my age and health status it would be almost impossible for me to die from COVID. My 95 year old grandmother survived it just fine. Wasn't even that bad for her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PhDinNY 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

The thing is, we don't know if someone really has a covid-19 infection when they are tested as "positive" for covid-19! One of my thoughts is that covid-19 really is pretty deadly, but because so many people just have a regular flu, or maybe even a cold, and test positive for covid-19, it makes the lethality appear to be lower. Unfortunately, we don't know what the truth is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– killerbunny88 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I think my sister and her family really had it. One of the things that seems to separate COVID from the normal flu is the loss of taste/smell. All 5 of them had some weirdness with their taste/smell. My sister lost hers completely for months. I saw her this last weekend and she mentioned that she doesn't think her sense of smell has fully returned. We were outside in her hottub and one of her neighbors was smoking. We could all smell the cigarette smoke, but she couldn't. She normally has a super strong sense of smell. Even better than mine.

She knows tons of ppl that had the same thing happen when COVID seemed to go through their neighborhood in November. Her and her family are all young and healthy, so they said it was like a bad cold/mild flu except for the weird smell/taste thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PhDinNY 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Yes, when it comes to certain symptoms, it seems that covid has some unique ones. It is the test that I think is identifying regular flu and cold as covid. (and I hope my wife doesn't get it, because she's the only one who can smell a lot of things in our house now :) )

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– killerbunny88 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

? Same in my house. My husband can't smell ANYTHING. He looks at me like I'm crazy sometimes. Then I pull out whatever was causing the offending odor and he's shocked lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PhDinNY 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I told my wife she should get a job as a professional "smeller" at some food or cosmetic place, because she can sense the slightest hint of anything! :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– killerbunny88 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Battlefield 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

By age group: 0-19 99.997% 20-49 99.96% 50-70 99.5% 70-90 94.1%

On top of this, those who don't recover overwhelmingly have low vitamin D levels and/or are overweight. So if you get healthy levels of vitamin D and you aren't overweight, then your recovery rates increase to even higher levels.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

0-19 99.997%

Quick somebody tell Foul Qi

He's just forbidden children from playing together unmasked anywhere, until every child has been vaxed with the fake vax.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JackANorey 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Even on worldmeters the people with it [whatever 'it' is], only 0.4% are seriously ill.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bedminster 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

It seems that an average of around 450 people are reported a month die as a result of getting the "vaccine" in the US. That's from the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) So possibly looking at over 5,400 people in a year in the US alone (projected) will die as a direct result of taking the "vaccine" from all manufactures combined. That's REPORTED and I have no doubt this is being way under reported.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– WinsAnon 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I hear your point. It'd be interesting to see how many people the vaccine is killing. We may not know this number for years because we don't know if the vaccine weakens our immune system across the board. Or if it has other genetic complications.

As to the unasked question, the one about survival rate of covid19 after the vaccine, proponents of the vaccine would not say they are trying to boost the survival rate, but trying to suppress the infection rate. So, apples and oranges as to that question, which I know you weren't asking.

The better argument we should stick to is the one you asked, put another way: why would I take an untested vaccine with unknown life-altering side effects when getting covid19 would give me lifetime antibodies with a chance of death that is perhaps nonexistent and is no worse than 0.03%?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Munchaussen 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

If you can raise the survival rate of 99.97 to 99.98+ by taking a shot that could very change your life for the worse or kill you....what do you have to lose? /S

I work at a hospital near Detoilet...the lying and ridiculous, arbitrary rules are off the chart. I was instructed this morning that I need goggles or a face shield around every patient. I wear eyeglasses and was told they don't protect my eyes from inbound harm...yet they have since I was 8 years old.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Could be as bad as 91% maybe worse and that’s without long term studies, who knows.

March 16 2021: “CRIPPLING COVID VACCINE REACTIONS, OVER 1,600 POSSIBLY-RELATED DEATHS AS OF MID-MARCH” https://www.bitchute.com/video/y44t1Bf4sasj/

94% side effects 9% severe

Op: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkvum9g7/horrifying-video-of-some-peoples/c/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WinsAnon 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Another great question is, since the medical community refuses to promise that the vaccine actually protects you against covid19, then after taking the vaccine you are subjected to the same pre-vaccine risk of being one of the 0.03% who contracts and dies of covid19, PLUS you are now adding a new risk of dying or having severe complications from the vaccine itself.

The vaccine is additive to your risks, not diminishing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cyphr 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Wrong. A John Hopkins report (also stickied under Hot) shows that the mortality rate for the chinese virus is about the same as a cold or the flu. Your survival rate in the title of your post is way too low. The actual survival rate is closer to 99.9 %, for all age groups - much higher for anyone under 60.

If you eliminate vitamin D deficiencies (prevalent in old and obese people) then the mortality rate approaches 1 in a million - 99.999% survival

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SophiatheCopt 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

That report is still kinda skewed because it only has the false data countries like China reported. It's the best we got though tbh.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dudemanfoo 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Virus that kills 20% could make the virus survival rate 99.8 tho!!!

who cares if moar people die to get there...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Virus that kills 20% could make the virus survival rate 99.8 tho!!!

Help us out here, we who are kinda stuck on that survival rate being 80% if 20% die

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jackdagger 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I just realized today Q practically told us that C19 = Flu. Idk why i never saw the post till today but it explains why kids are unaffected too. There is no covid. Which i even thought was a stretch but I'm pretty much on that train now

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CokeOrPepe 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

96%

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Gnometard 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

99.9995%

That survival rate is assuming their inflated death counts are not inflated.

THINK LOGICALLY.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mcmurdo32 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I'm not anti-vax, but the way the vaccines are being pushed by people and entities known to be control freaks is making me nervous about them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Tristan 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/207273/covid-19-deaths-infection-fatality-ratio-about/

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy