6
Liberalhypocrisy 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can go either way… however not every thing that happens is a psyop. Trannies are crazy and their motive is that they hate that you’re normal, not a stretch in the least to believe it was them.

I’m concerned that the attitude on this board from some is that there’s “no way” it's just deranged troons, like it’s the craziest thing in the world. It makes me feel like there are many tranny freaks who have infiltrated and want to divide the narratives.

7
Liberalhypocrisy 7 points ago +7 / -0

No muzzle flash whatsoever and if this is actually true then Q is complicit in it. That’s not cool, considering they told us to Trust in God.

3
Liberalhypocrisy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well yeah, that’s totally plausible. I just can’t get behind the idea that is pinned on this board right now suggesting that because big companies are holding moments of silence for an influential persons death, we need to be careful because it’s just another psyop! That would implicate the Trump administration being complicit in this, and I don’t buy that for a second.

7
Liberalhypocrisy 7 points ago +7 / -0

I guess so. Q murdered Charlie Kirk in alliance with Israel to wake people up and I guess the “ending isn’t for me.”

That sounds insane, not like an opinion of critical thinking.

15
Liberalhypocrisy 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is suggesting that the killing of Charlie Kirk is a Trump admin psyop. That would mean we’re supposed to believe that an innocent man was murdered and made a martyr by the Q operation that we all are following.

I am critically thinking, and I critically think this is stupid disinformation bullshit designed to inflame an already emotionally charged group of people and perhaps pull them apart. It makes sense that Charlie Kirk’s murder would piss off and wake up a ton of people. He was a good man, and a friend of those in the Trump administration, including a very good friend of the Vice President. It’s not even that he was, who he was though, people are waking up because they finally are realizing that anyone who disagrees with the elites narratives is in danger. You can think that should have happened when our President was shot at on stage in Butler, however the masses have been desensitized towards violence against Trump for years and Trump is a highly controversial political figure who held office and now holds office again. The fact that organizations like the New York Yankees are coming out and giving a moment of silence for this isn’t some conspiracy that they are propping up Charlie Kirk’s death for a psyop, but more proof that the cultural landscape is changing and that normal people will wake up if morally challenged enough. That’s what Q said. Q also said that 5-10% can’t be saved which is also what we are seeing, and the 90% are fighting back, chanting in the streets, flooding London, flooding South Korean streets, getting people shit canned for acting like demons etc.

The real problem is that this place used to be about actually discussing the things Q actually gave us, with their post and deltas. I see none of that now, I see a bunch of pointless conjecture that actually destroys the entire Q narrative. Feels like infiltration to me.

4
Liberalhypocrisy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ben Shapiro was doing college tours before Charlie Kirk was even known. I don’t see how him going back to doing that, even before Charlie died, is a bad thing or him “taking over.” He even spoke at a college campus as recently as last year. I think he was clarifying that he would eventually still speak at colleges because the day before (9/10) he cancelled a college speech, and then in the direct aftermath of the tragedy said that “…speaking outside at colleges, is over…”

4
Liberalhypocrisy 4 points ago +4 / -0

He already had a fall tour scheduled I believe.

5
Liberalhypocrisy 5 points ago +5 / -0

When has Ben Shapiro ever indicated he was going to buy TPUSA and I’m assuming the company belongs to Erika now, when has she said Ben Shapiro is buying it?

16
Liberalhypocrisy 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yeah they are forced to write opinion pieces instead of reporting things as fact. They also are forced to not straight up lie in head lines. Such as MSNBC reporting that the Charlie Kirk shooter had “fascist remarks engraved on bullets,” which is technically true, but said in a way to obviously deceive the audience.

15
Liberalhypocrisy 15 points ago +15 / -0

Patriots in control. You are on a Q board.

Which compromised Mod troon is pinning shit like this.

29
Liberalhypocrisy 29 points ago +29 / -0

The most consequential act ever repealed to be honest. This movies turning.

2
Liberalhypocrisy 2 points ago +2 / -0

True. If more concrete evidence comes out, I will change my mind. However right now you’re expecting me to believe that Israel was stupid enough committed political suicide while also being able to not leave any actual evidence at the scene of the attack. All while we have several other organizations that would benefit more in their positions from Charlie Kirk dying, and have a leftist idiot with a tranny boyfriend as the culprit.

1
Liberalhypocrisy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The issue with all of that is that I deal in truth and things I don’t know are not truth until more evidence comes out to then support the things I previously didn’t know as truth. The CIA is fundamentally different because I know everything I can know about that organization and their role in America. Several good presidents have been shot by the CIA in an attempt to undermine Americans, they have done horrible experiments on American citizens both physically and psychologically, and I know that is a perversion of what America stands for, therefore I am able to separate them as an evil entity corrupting America from the United States itself. Whereas Mossads interest are to the state of Israel itself. That is apparent.

3
Liberalhypocrisy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Israel and Mossad are one in the same and Mossad is the arm of Israel that would do an assassination.

4
Liberalhypocrisy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ok? But how many normal people know this? I didn’t really follow Charlie’s day to day activities, so I didn’t know about this until 3 days ago, and I’m generally well informed on politics. Most people thought of Charlie as an Israel defender. They had way more to lose than to gain.

7
Liberalhypocrisy 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe they would’ve fired a warning shot. Charlie Kirk was and still is considered an “Israel defender.” It would be really fucking stupid to kill that guy right now knowing what we know. So unless it comes out that they sent him warning letters or something, I just don’t think it’s true, and it’s not that I don’t want it to be true, I’m ready to turn that place upside down.

I really don’t understand why some of us can’t just believe that it was a demon possessed leftist kid who got possessed online and wanted to be a hero to his messed up cause. That’s what happens everywhere, everyday with these people.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›