This video shows who the real shooter is: https://x.com/TruthBiglyPower/status/1966773268846686587
The guy in white standing in the crowd on the right side of Charlie. He raises his arm and points his "cellphone" like a gun. His other hand holds the "cellphone" to support it like you would when you fire a pistol. After the shot, you can see the "cellphone" he's holding recoil back.
The truth is that the shooter was not holding a cellphone, but rather a cellphone pistol called Ideal Conceal. Here's what it looks like: https://youtube.com/shorts/WO3FtY9Sh3w?si=535n6pYPEWPfecpc
Some of you may be thinking, tHeRe WaS nO rEcOiL. tHe GuY tWiTcHeD fRoM hEaRiNg ThE lOuD sOuNd Of ThE sHoT.
Oh really? A twitch with your whole arm and elbow shaking and moving up at the same time Charlie is shot? People don't move their arms like that when they twitch. They move their shoulder, neck or head similar to being jump scared. Nobody movies their arm in that jolting manner when they twitch.
Some of you may be asking, hOw CaN tHe ThE sHoOtEr Be On ThE rIgHt If ThE bUlLeT hOlE iS oN tHe LeFt SiDe Of HiS nEcK.
The bullet hole on the left side of his neck is the EXIT WOUND. The entry wound is much more minimal and hard to see because the blood does not gush out of that area. As you can see, exit wounds are always much larger: https://x.com/ArcaneKnowledge/status/1966861368570638711
Here's a picture of the possible entry wound on the right side of his ear: https://x.com/GiggsGroyp/status/1966845737536516440
Some of you may also be wondering: hOw CoUlD iT bE a PiStOl If ThE sOuNd hEaRd WaS fRoM a RiFlE. It turns out that it was a rifle sound but it was a blank fired by Tyler from the roof. This was done as a distraction so the real shooter could get away.
As you can see, a lot of you who believe Tyler Robinson is the shooter are wrong. It was intended for you to believe that because they wanted you to. They did everything they could to create a patsy narrative and even used the bald old guy too.
But who is "they?" Tyler was working in tandem with the guy in white. Not only that, but the security guards on the right of Charlie who gave the shooter hand signals were also in on it.
Here you can see Tyler walking up the stairs with the guy in white. He is following him like a good patsy. Tyler is obviously not the leader or brains of the operation. He was just the fall guy: https://x.com/JeffMcCloskey3/status/1966943963828678744
The security that worked for Charlie was Shaffer Security Group. Notice who they have allegiance to. Their logo is the Lion of Judah. I believe they all took part in Charlie's assassination. https://x.com/deepwebslinger/status/1966817311060287534
This is the most important post right now because it reveals Charlie's real killer. Everyone thinks it's Tyler Robinson, but they have been fooled. We need everyone to know the truth so do what you can to get this post as much attention as possible.
Thank you.
Hand signals to time the two shots? It looks like two shooters.
Ding ding
So guy on roof is the real patsy? Did he have blanks?
The only thing 'dinging' is that marble rolling around in your skull.
Same thing as JFK
Exactly. Driver.
The "cell phone gun", or whatever it is, is down below Charlie's shoulder, at about pectoral level, nowhere near where a bullet trajectory would lead to the exit wound on the neck UNLESS it passed through his chest (and probably his arm also) on an upward path.
I wonder if we'll ever get detailed autopsy results, and if so if we'll find them believable.
I equally find this dubious. That "cell gun" fires 380 acp, a small caliber center fire. I'm confident a small caliber like that would be stopped by bones in the body. The angle is all wrong, unless you want to start calling it a magic bullet (no, please dont start.)
Check out videos of ballistic jelly penetration on that type of round. You would NOT use it for assassination.
In addition, there is no telltale muzzle flash. Also, look at the recoil in the demonstration video. Do you see any of that disturbance from the "shooter?"
TV and movies distort our perception of reality, and of what actual bullets can do.
A cell phone gun... really. What i do know is that a 380 with a tiny barrel like that is gonna be super inaccurate.
Would be a really good shot for that guy to hit him.
Additionally the lady next to him doesn't appear to have just had her ears blown out by a gun being shot right next to her head. Her reaction is rather mild and expected for a snap 200 yards away not from 10 inches away.
Exactly, 100%. A gun in that little tent would echo so bad you wouldn't be able to hear for a bit. You would also involuntarily flinch because it hurt so bad.
There was no shooter within 20 ft. Of Charlie. Common sense dictates that.
Don't even speculate on subsonic rounds or silencers. You will look a fool and not know what you are talking about.
Saw this on another GAW post:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_Conceal
At this point, anything is possible. I'm not believing the MSM narrative we're being fed.
Below Charlie's shoulder? You are looking at it from a video and making this conclusion. There are a lot of angles and other spatial factors you cannot see from a video. The guy in the crowd was likely standing on an incline because the arena had stairs going up from where Charlie was sitting.
What's clear is that there is a CLEAR LINE OF SIGHT from the guy in the crowd and Charlie's neck. Also, if you look at the full video, the guy put his "phone" down when Charlie bent down to grab the mic. The reason is because he cannot take the shot at this time. Then when Charlie leans up again, he gets the hand signal, aims and fires.
Full video:https://x.com/salomondrin/status/1966255182662218099
The guy making a conclusion from a video complaining another person is making a conclusion from that same video is just fucking priceless.
Your write up is the very definition of making conclusions upon which you can't possibly make from a grainy video.
Then when someone points out the obvious holes in your conclusion you patch and dismiss them with even wackier explanations.
What about the guy not aiming?
Your answer: "it's a cell phone gun. Use your brain."
I'm sorry. What?! 😂
What about the guy in the white shirt being Frank Turek?
Your answer: "Likely a handler and don't believe woman. They can't critically think. Plus the guy in the white shirt walked in with Tyler."
Then you post a link to a photo of some persons white sleeve! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣 Again. What?!
What about the lack of a noise of a gun shot from that direction?
Your answer: "the cell phone "gun" had to have a modified silencer." 😂
Holy chet! They were able to make a gun that fits in a cell phone profile that includes a silencer. Are you fucking serious with this junk?
A modified silencer?!! That's your explanation?
How did the shots fire at the exact same time?
Your answer: "Hand signals"
🤣🤣🤣 Wowsers! 🤣🤣🤣 Could those hand signals possibly be for the rest of the security team to coordinate without communicating via voice so that no one could intercept their communications? That's a hell of a much better explanation then gun shot synchronization.
"What about the muzzle flash?"
Your answer: "The cell phone gun likely conceals the flash."
So now a cell phone "gun" is designed with a "modified" silencer included a flash suppressor?!!!🤣🤣 A flash suppressor that is 100% effective at that!
What about the fact that everyone in the crowd flinched at the same time as the "shooter" which you seem to indicate is not flinching but recoil movement?
Your answer: "the lady flinched also"
Correct. So did everyone in the crowd also. At the same exact time. Are we to believe they all felt the recoil of the gun? Did they all have guns and all missed but one guy?!! 😂 And we're all synched up with these hand signals?
What about Charlie's shirt movement?
Your answer: "Physics. Bullets have extreme velocity"
Correct. Physics exists. How exactly does a shirt make that kind of movement with these physics you speak of? Do your physics rely on the same laws of physics in our realm of existence or have you discovered a new law of physics along with this noiseless, flash less, recoil-less cell phone gun you speak of?
In conclusion. Just making sure I understand your analysis.
The shooter was actually to the right of Charlie. Knowing tens if not hundreds of phones would be recording in his direction. He coordinated with a guy in a white sleeve in conjunction with a security team via obvious hand signals, also in front of these hundreds of recording cell phones, in order to synchronize a blank "shot" from a distance at the exact moment the real shot came from within the crowd from a recoil-less, flash less, suppressed cell phone gun that shoots bullets that defy laws of physics.
Did I understand your theory accurately?
Buddy to believe your crap you m ust thin k we have the brain of children.
I would think that Patel would have his people in place at the autopsy. It is a joint investigation.
They say the bullet ricocheted off of Charlie's bullet proof vest under his T shirt (which raised up from the jolt) and then hit his neck.
I hate that this seems plausible. Also, where is the rifle when the “shooter” jumps off the roof? Is it possible the gun was never on the roof? I think you are right, and this should be stickied.
He has a long object in his left hand when he's jumping down from the roof, it is there. The video quality just sucks.
I totally agree...WHERE is the gun when he jumps off the roof? why is nobody asking this question!!!!
You can't be serious. Watch the video of dipshit jumping from the roof. The gun is clear.
The media has already eaten Tyler Robinson hook line and sinker and this will be the "grassy knoll" (truth) narrative they will attempt to discredit 24/7 and waste millions doing.
I see what you're talking about. But that is some seriously perfect aim while holding the cell phone gun chest high and not aiming.
Edit: also, I do not think Tyler was the shooter, either. I think it was someone close to him. The security guard with his arms crossed... his lack of flinch at the noise, and then he steps backwards... odd movement.
and not a person flinching from it going off?
That, too. And, if I am standing next to that guy, I would know.
Regarding the guard, I am speculating with absolutely no evidence that he is using smart glasses to take aim, take the shot and move so as to look like he is startled and "guarding" . Where are the sound guys to analyze where the shot came from?
Not possible to synchronize two shots, even if one is a blank.
Do cell -phone guns make noise?
Yes they did the girl beside him flinched and then looked like she was moving away.
I appreciate the insult. Calm down.
The video you posted shows him holding it shoulder high, and not looking through any "gun" sights. He never places his eye behind it. It's a cavalier shot.
Looks like the man in the white hat is Frank Turek from CrossExamined.org. I don't know if I believe the current narrative but also don't believe Frank would be involved.
https://youtu.be/kaHhpQk0C_k?si=e5N5lEDcDWXfXXHx
Frank was likely Charlie's handler. He's also jewish and his surname is of East European Ashkenazic origin. Do you think he would back Charlie or the zionists controlling him?
Most women cannot critically think and think with emotions. So if he's a friend of hers, you best believe she would never suspect anything. The lady is a moron and anyone believing her is also one.
This lady said if Frank knew what was going to happen he would have thrown himself in front of Charlie. Frank ducked then ran away (as seen in the long form video).
Whatever the truth is, I can guarantee you that Tyler Robinson believes he is the shooter.
That's how these things work. The perfect plan.
It's not a lie if you believe it.
Ahh yes, the psychosis plan. The human grasp of reality.
are we are absolutely retarded?
you can see there is nothing in his hands before the shot. unless you believe in magic, a gun did not magically appear in the hands of your alleged shooter.
Let's not forget, your retard shooter wasn't lined up with Charlie.
This is 100% a retard take. Did you not even look at the video before you spend time spewing that retardness?
I believe this one has merit and deserves serious scutiny and consideration
This is far more plausible than the other stories. Thank you.
If this is true, then the medical examination would show that there is an entry wound on the right and an exit wound on the left. I am pretty sure that Patel had people at the MEs office to oversee the examination since it is a joint operation. If true, and the scenario you present is covered up in lieu of another narrative, that would mean conspiracy on a very high level. Not that we have not seen this before, but in this day and age with so many eyes on this case, given our history of such assassination conspiracies, and the current administration, it would have to be a conspiracy of massive reach and scope to buffalo that many people in the current administration - especially if they are aware of a coverup with Trump's attempted assassination. If true, we may have much bigger problems than we realize. Thank you for your efforts. Very informative.
I dont think they did an autopsy because it all seemed to fast for me.
It would have been expedited given the level of high involvement and profile of the case. It does not take that long to do the examination. The ME is only looking for cause of death and the retrieval of medical evidence. The rest of the forensics will be done by the crime labs. The local ME of the county would be the lead examiner while the FBI, by cooperation, would also be there. If the FEDs did not participate, that is a problem. I find it hard to believe that Trump's people would not participate in this procedure given the level of coverups in the past. Kash was in Utah at the time.
However, I am hearing that Kash was not happy about aspects of this investigation already from his subordinates. We shall see.
The trajectory isn't right, why would charlie's shirt move like that if the bullet entered at an upward angle?
If a gun went off near that lady's ear, we'd see it in her reaction.
It's impossible to sync the sound of two guns going off.
I'm no gun expert, but have been to a range a few times. You can hear the difference between a larger gun, a larger caliber and a little conceal carry gun.
The timing isn't right either. He flinches at the same time as everyone else in that crowd.
The FBI withholding the suspect image and the numerous people claiming something big was going to happen are more leads that hold more water.
There was a clear path to the neck from where the guy in the crowd was standing. It was clear as day. Charlie's shirt moved up because of something called physics. Bullets have extreme velocity.
How did the gun go off in sync? There were two spotters there giving them cues with hand signals. Are you a moron?
We did see the lady jump and flinch when the shot went off. Are you blind? Also, there's a possibility of the gun having a modified silencer on it. You must consider that as well. You are not too bright and it is very obvious you are not an expert.
Okay. And it's obvious you know nothing about firearms
You’re obviously not an expert either. You’re a moron who thinks they’re smart. There’s no way to coordinate 2 shots with 4 people involved. You’d have a difficult time coordinating it electronically because there would be a delay due to the signal having to travel further for the gun farther away.
Now they magically had a modified silencer. Did the cell phone gun also shoot 30 caliber rifle bullets?
The amazing thing is that you built your whole conspiracy theory in a bunch of grainy video and photos and want everyone to believe it.
I read Tyler said he had a special gun. I also remember seeing one of the pics of Tyler and wondering what large rectangular thing was in his pocket. But you’re saying Tyler used the rifle as a distraction. All I know is the official story doesn’t add up.
Edit: here’s the pic I mean, see the odd shape in his pocket. Maybe he delivered the special gun then acted as cover on the rooftop?
https://files.catbox.moe/4vz0vp.jpeg
I've seen posts where people say that they think that that square in his pocket is actually the butt of the gun, and the barrel is pointed upwards and under his shirt. And that would explain how he bent his right knee in another pic of him going up the stairs.
Don't know myself.
No muzzle flash whatsoever and if this is actually true then Q is complicit in it. That’s not cool, considering they told us to Trust in God.
Maybe Charlie was not shot with a bullet but outfitted with a remote controlled AIR SQUIB device.
Be careful. I just got silenced on here by giving a different thought and video to this OBVIOUS bullshit story we’re getting about this murder.
No muzzleflash, NO RECOIL! Where's the entry wound!
I address this in the post. Did you read it? The recoil is there and visible. This cellphone gun likely conceals the muzzle flash.
Is it possible the guy in white detonates an "AIR SQUIB" device?
How would it conceal any kind of muzzle flash?
Being a shooter, and training newbies proper firearm etiquette... I often take video of them shooting (but not straight on), to get a nice muzzle flash pic for them to remember the outing.
Only half the time will I get a decent flash, using my cell phone to capture it.
It's so quick, the frame rate doesn't always catch the full fireball.
This.
Good point.
Excellent post, I too don't think the bullet came from the roof top.
He put his phone in his pocket... brought his hands up and bumped his fists together reacting to what was said.. and then flinched the second time to the gun fire.
Suppressed bullets still have powder visible. Suppressed still have sound that all those people would have reacted to the first time.
This is more than outlandish... that shit is so murky, and accusations of one being a shooter and an accomplice is really reckless.
Robinson confessed to the shooting. They have his palm print on the rifle. It was a conspiracy since he was communication with someone on DIscord but for sure this guy Tyler pulled the trigger on the 30.06!
That guy twitched from hearing the gunshot
Re-read the post. I edited just for you
disagree ive seen many people jump like that around guns
You can see their shoulder jump up. Are you blind or just retard
Bro the insults to anyone even questioning the narrative you have researched is dumb as hell. Stop it. Youre ecen pre mocking legit questions. Basically youre coming off as a major asshole
https://x.com/salomondrin/status/1966255182662218099 Full video, start at the 8:54 mark. It is kind of compelling that he is doing something.
Possibility. Here is a longer video highlighting several people. https://x.com/proselytizer18/status/1966717074215985263?s=61&t=Na9w5fE3ieoT5_-6p6gtUw
I don't know. The guy to the right in white has a cell phone. There's no recoil, as a .380 ACP would give. No barrel smoke. Just his reaction after the shot. The guy in green, on the other hand, has his arms folded and watch his body as the shot is fired and his reaction as he steps back. If you look closely, I believe you can see the barrel of a gun tucked right under his left arm pit. If you super slow mo when he drops his hand from under his armpit you can see something shiny. My bet is the guy in green. My 2 cents worth. It doesn't matter really cause Charlie is gone.
Why is everybody so blind and forgetting that when Charlie was hit, his body recoils back and there is a clear impact made to the front of his chest. If he was shot from behind why would his body be recoiling back, as if he were shot from the front?
I think everyone is wanting this to be more than it really is. I'm not saying there isn't a conspiracy around this, but in my opinion the shooter, whoever he is, was definitely on the roof. Everyone was reacting to a gun shot sound from that direction as well, everyone turned to that direction.
Lady in blue and white and fat black shirt MAGA look like they greet the man in green. Man in green already has weapon under arm.
Lady in blue and white starts filming.
BW/MAGA don't move when the crowd reacts.
Green shirt man puts his weapon away under his untucked shirt.
Simplest explanation is most likely the truth.
The guy flinched when he heard the shot report.
I advise everybody citing no muzzle flash to do a quick search for flash suppressed powder., and also powder burn rates.
Muzzle flash is only a guarantee in action flicks.
Most performance or defense ammo is flash suppressed given the likelihood of low light use to not impair your night vision abilities with a miniature flashbang.
Also, 30-06 to the throat at the claimed distance would have done quite a bit more of a decapitation attempt as well as pushing him backwards, not forwards and left. Also a little more Cobain style decoration on the backdrop.
I also believe the shot came from behind right, but I speculated a shoulder area impact with a redirect off the inside of the scapula and the carotid exit wound. 30.06 being 30 cal is going to give a 7.62mm entry before any kind of deformation. The neck wound appears to be roughly half an inch or a little over. Many handgun rounds are able to reach that expanded diameter and also limit overpenetration that would draw more attention, such as a secondary victim from the same bullet.
I'll have to look up the flash suppressed powder. But I agree with most of this. Wouldn't there still be a heat signature that might be visible, even with a subsonic load?
There's no splatter to the rear, but plenty from the front. And that side of his neck is mostly intact.
Plus a 30-06 would've struck people and things behind Kirk after it passed through his soft tissues. No reports of collateral injuries.
I'm on the side of shot from behind, but not from a cell phone in the frame of the first video.
If you look at his security team just before the shooting, they're clearly using hand signals. Might be normal/expected behavior, might not.
https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/what-powders-have-flash-suppression.821053/
More idiot shit.
I’ve been saying this. Tyler was the moldable lunatic to take the fall but the shot was from behind and to the right.
It did not sound like a .30-06.
When i first saw the original video, I thought he was shot in the chest. Reports confirmed that he was wearing body armor, which caused the bullet to ricochet to his neck. If you watch the first video you share, you can clearly see Charlie's shirt get impacted at chest level before entering the neck. It is interesting with the cell phone and recoil, as well as the bloody right ear. Not sure what to think - multiple shooters?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc
Yep, the ricochet is my take too.
Yep, the hole in the shirt is definitive
I suggested this as well in earlier posts. So you are not alone here as its two scenarios. Charlie had body armour on. So an initial report was the round ricoched off his armour into his neck and hence the shirt POOF . My contention was another observation as you point out, the round came across his body. The additional footage is available in slo mo where it shows the round coming across his right shoulder into his left side and neck.
They promise full discloser in 2085. Anyway, somebody did it. /sarc/
Frank Turek was raised Catholic, became a Protestant:
He was raised Catholic, but he became a Protestant during his time as a flight officer in the U.S. Navy after being recommended apologetic books written by Josh McDowell, in particular Evidence That Demands a Verdict and More Than a Carpenter, as per Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Turek