THIS! All the shilling for birth control here as if it’s harmless reminds me of the left with vaccines FFS. And I shouldn’t have to say “obviously abortion is bad” because abortion is obviously fucking worse.
Here’s the answer: Track the cycle using body temperature and avoid having sex a week before ovulation. There are times during a healthy woman’s cycle where it’s perfectly safe (as in no risk of pregnancy). Avoid those BC pills y’all they are arguably worse than these shitty vaccines
Media “Authority”, in a nutshell.
Can’t tell you the amount of times I’ve heard the phrase “if that happened, why didn’t the news report it?” From my brainwashed friends as if it was some sort of legitimate argument against the facts I present
I agree that it is pretty nuanced. My point really is don’t fret over lost friendships if they were the ones to cut ties over this stuff. I’d even go so far as to say don’t even pursue friendship with those types unless they come and apologize and there is a renewed sense of respect for each others ideas. No respect, no friendship - differences are certainly fine and, in fact, expected
Funny how they imply that ‘QAnon’ (whoever tf that is) believes a “biblical storm” will “wash away” all the satanist pedos. As if ‘QAnon’ believes a literal storm will remove these people. ? the storm couldn’t possibly be metaphorical, now could it?
NCSWIC
Not that I disagree - but this article was written by the New York Times. So none of what’s in there should a surprise. Besides who are they even polling? These are all made up numbers from the usual corporate media culprits.
Hey MSM - why don’t you guys ever report some of the many factual Q posts? Why do you hide behind polls and sentiment instead of addressing the facts? Losers ?
"A broader review of existing scientific evidence clearly shows that approved masks with correct certification, and worn in compliance with guidelines, are an effective prevention of COVID-19 transmission."
The "studies" that didn't actually do any part of the scientific method... the studies that said "Well we dont really know by wear your mask anyways bigot"? -.-
"A subsequent internal investigation by the Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher have determined that this article was externally peer reviewed but not with our customary standards of rigor prior to publication. The journal has re-designed its editorial and review workflow to ensure that this will not happen again in future."
LMAO. it was peer reviewed but not by /ourguys/
Catch ery’body (everybody)... maybe