Boom!

So are we saying they should have been granted asylum because they are white? That's what most of the comments seem to be saying.

Somebody needs their Adobe license taken away, that is horrible.

Ded.

So, just wanted to make sure I get this straight:

• Scott Adams supported Black people so much he "identified" as Black.

• Scott Adams sees a new "poll" in which 26% of a pathetic sample size of 130 Blacks do not support the statement "It's OK to be White".

• Rather than question the strangely high % of non responses across all races to the poll, Scott Adams decides to add the non responses to that number so he can get upset that its nearly half.

• Scott Adams determines that this new poll deeply changes his views and he can no longer be on team Black.

• Scott Adams determines that we should now "get away" from Blacks due to this new poll.

• Scott Adams uses his own home purchase which he made over 20 years ago as the specific strategy of how he chose to "get away" from Blacks due to this new poll.

• We applaud.

Seems to me it is another example of us embracing anything that upsets Liberals without questions or logic.

Don't disagree with anything you said. Personally I have gotten sick of the hopium of Rasmussen with conservative candidates winning easily for months in their polls only to collapse in the last week or two to the aggregate average so they can brag about how accurate they are. Both side have bad pollsters, I consider Rasmussen one of ours.

As far as all polls being subsets, yes, but again no one typically reports results with 130 responders of which over 20% didn't answer. That barely even counts as a poll.

I'm sure an accurate poll would be a sad take on race relations. On the other hand I'm not sure we should be applauding Adams decision to add the strangely high non response number to the negative responses. That feels like a decision to me, and what I was trying to point out all along. I will also add that if you rewatch his video it makes little sense due to the fact that he has lived in that house for nearly 20 years.

But I get your point, in some ways he was just being honest and is being crucified for it. Just not sure that in the end he chose a way to do it that is helpful or worth his sacrifice.

Well you have a poll with an unusually high % of non responders. That number is high across White, Black and Other. You have a pollster with a history of click bait results who uses non standard polling techniques that he largely refuses to explain. You have a total of around 130 Black responders which would give the results to that particular question a massive +/- variable. You are looking at a 26% negative response from Blacks. You are looking at a total 12% negative response from all Americans and a total 12% negative response from Democrats, which doesn't fit any narrative.

Like I say, you can decide how you want to read it, but it seems more like a Rorschach test than a poll to me, and a sad little hill to die on.

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1629886078298603520/photo/1

There is the poll. You can decide how you want to read it.

You should look up the poll. It never said anything like Adams claims.

The libertards may have always hated Trump, but they never betrayed him the way the GOP is doing.

They don't know.

Did you know that I stubbed my toe and my stocks went up?

So the plan was to threaten 1.8 million Americans and not get caught doing it? Not have a one of them report the threat/bribe/blackmail? This is a secret that was expected to be kept by 1.8 million election workers and their families?

Does that make any kind of sense?

BOOM!

Ted Nugent?

Fair, I have been gone a while due to family illness. I know how much we all wanted Q to come back, but they know that too.

Can emotions be used to influence decisions?

I never felt like Q was hand-feeding me baby food before.

Just be careful guys.

Come on guys, this doesn't read like old Q postings at all. This is obviously a lark.