Ballistically Oswald could not possibly have been the only shooter. Even RFK, Jr. knows better that that. Get up to speed with this: "JFK to 911 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" https://rumble.com/embed/ucfsd.v306ls2/
Yeah, we know your type. "...and one of you say unto them, “Depart in peace; be ye warmed and filled,” without giving them those things which are needful to the body, what doth it profit?" James 2:16
WWJD? Playing that card again? Metallica lived by example. You pray, you say? How nice. The only example you set was to open this stupid thread and to criticize.
You have pointed to no meaningful action or physical contribution to relieve suffering --- perhaps just contrasting your somewhat less-than -fulsome efforts with those of Metallica - who for some stupid reason you think falls short in spite of donating $100K; you have done nothing personally that costs you anything to help anybody in Georgia, and North Carolina.
At best you are little better than Peter "When Peter therefore saw him, he said to Jesus, Lord, what shall this man do?" (John 21:21) -- you are so busy picking on everyone else and judging what Metallica are doing, you accomplish nothing meaningful yourself to reiieve anyone's suffering.
This is just Chevron decision backlash from those whose oxen are now gored
Imagine an election where there is no Democrat President candidate to vote for.
One of those 9 rogue ManPads intended for Trump is manned by a DEI hire that mistakes AF-2 carrying Harris with TrumpForce-1 carrying Trump, and all of a sudden all those phony ballots cast for Harris (1) won't count (2) will have to be re-printed/re-issued with a new top ticket name - Walz is not automatically authorized to fill a vacancy like that, and all ballots cast/printed only feature him in the second slot.
Call a spade a spade. Playing their word games only masks their crimes and when you cuck you become their enabler. It's a good expose because he doesn't mince words. You owe the Zionists no fealty.
Saw it last night in Danbury, CT. Excellent movie. All good people will like it.
Agreed, but not "controlled" as implied by this person. This person might actually be a plant intended to besmirch the reputation of the greatest President of our time prior to Trump -- who took out the forever war- mongering types as the Zionist's USSR and Warsaw Pact was made to collapse uner its own weight --- and Bush couldn't stop the momentum, like he did when the CCP in China was about to collapse under his Presidency.
Merely parroting Zionist press smears reflects negatively on your intellect. You need to develop critcal thinking skills as opposed to just belching the gang-land consensus drivel of shows like "The View."
Reagan was not controlled by George Bush.
"The New England states have close to 5% property taxes -- 4%+ of the purchase price PER YEAR.
That is just robbery."
Agree, but I live in CT in a house with property valued at just north of $1MM. Properrty tax where I live ~ 75 miles north of NYC is ~$14,000. Therefore, ~ 1.4% of total property value/yr, not 5%. Income tax @ 3- 6.99% and sales tax at 6.35% is brutal.
Pay back private Central Bankers' debt-based money created from nothing with money created from nothing. Trump hinted at this. Monetize bitcoin as authorized Congress per Constitution. Pay off the debt present and future. All that debt goes "poof." Kind of like the old Hebrew 50-year Jubillee Year did. Repeal the Fed Res Act. Repeal the falsely-ratified 16th Amendment.
Freeze Congressional appropriations deflating the inflationary pressure of $ value of gold/ounce back to $2067 gold/oz.
Next freeze convertability of Fed Reserve note money then in circulation to $2067/oz gold. Issue new currency - United States Notes - valued at $20.67/oz gold denominated in US Notes. Effect price adjustment where Fed Res notes are made convertable at a rate of $1 US Note = $100 Fed res notes.
Re-denomination of assets takes place in terms of Treasury issued US Notes - backed by gold without debt accruing to private Central Bankers preserves the wealth of all as it re-orients the denomination of the US financial system.
Imagine 4-cents/gallon gas and spacious middle class affordable properties for $7K - 10k. Your $200,000/yr annual salary becomes $2000/yr but the money you have is actually valuable now, and no longer artificially inflated. Demands on one's income is also redenominated by a factor of 100x downward.
Result: very nearly pre-1913 era asset re-valuation with honest currency backed by gold at what was then the prevailing rate of $20.67/oz of gold and no more debt based currency + a debt free nation.
Calling your bluff, dick puff.
Crawl up in a ball and you just keep sucking your meat pipe, crack head.
" If a vigilante kills one of these demons who do you think will be blamed?" Like I said, and it still appears that you failed to read/comprehend: BLM/ANTIFA are the unmistake-able actors in this illustration. The left can and will whine about Trump's rhetoric even as MSNBC is doing right now in the wake of failed attempt #2. Let them.
" I want to see them hang after tribunals." You naiively trust the justice system. You want to see them hanged. Fine. I want them done in by their own. Much faster and far more instructive as an object lesson. Take your time trying BLM assassins - if they aren't Epsteined in custody. Seriously, get some perspective.
"These fucks would love to see Trump's head blown off. There rhetoric is not advocating for peace. They want violence" You've just made my case for swiftness.
"Let's be the decent human beings we should be" so says the guy with the screen name "hotcrackpipe." ( /snark)
Decent human beings enjoy watching a good schadenfreud moment unfold every now and then.
The crack addled are free to express flaccid opinions, of course, based as they are on a poor command of reading comprehension, and - for what its worth - in this instance you certainly have.
Perhaps you don't understand what is meant by the metaphor: "the tail of the snake taking out the head"?
"We don't want that" Virtue signaling pearl clutching is for their side, not ours. Have you no historical pespective?
Heve you never read Napoleon? Napoleon said 'Never interfere with an enemy while he's in the process of destroying himself.'
Why would you not want the enemy to destroy themeselves?
Do you also oppose the actions of the on-side "conspirators" that almost took out Hitler? Was the Union side not benefitted by the friendly fire that took down Stonewall Jackson?
Why wouldn't we want our opposition's plans and methods intended to destroy us blow up in their face instead, which in turn leads to the added benefit of prosecutions of BLM types that have been denied for years? Turn about is fair play. Don't let their too clever by half crisis go to waste
So I'll ask you again: Why would you not want the enemy to destroy themeselves -- by their own hand and by their own methods?
Have you no appreciation for poetic justice -- an enemy destroyed by their own designs?
They have openly tried twice to take out our guy - never mind all the other times we don't know about -- and they may still try again. The latest would be assassin got caught and is in FL custody - not the Feds. Feds fucked up. Their inside mole is now exposed - the guy who fed this assassin Trump's schedule. The deep state is getting sloppy. Wouldn't it be poetic justice for them to get so sloppy again that the next MKUltra pawn misses and on a third violent occasion they instead take out their own guy?
I marvel at the possibility of the tail of the snake taking out the head and all you can say is "we don't want that"?
October surprise? I will laugh so hard if some manic ANTIFA/BLM type takes out Harris or Walz in mid-end of October without any time left to change the printed ballots already cast by that time - fraudulent or otherwise. Anarchy of ANTIFA and BLM would be finally prosecte-able because it hurt a (D). And the (D)s - particualrly supporters of Harris -- who raised money to bail out BLM would have no one to blame but their own candidate for the reason they don't have viable candidte to vote for! It would lead to the end of the vote early/mail in shenanigans. Only ballots cast on the day of election and only for eleigible LIVING candidates would count.
Thank you. Have been a member there since 1998, but I haven't posted over there for years. Was banned a couple of times, one time for defending (not necessarily supporting) Rudy Giuliani's candidacy in 2008. JimRob considered him to be too liberal and he purged a lot of long time posters over it. Went to the Freeper March on Washingtom in 2009. Got to meet many screen names with whom I had conversed. Got banned for a time ~ 2005 when I engaged vigorously in the "Crevo Wars" with the "Darwin Central" retards who eventually all got banned Like it much better at GAW. They tend to be perpetually black pilled over on FR these days.
More correctly, do you nean the first and second Laws of Thermodynamics (not 3 laws of "Thermodtynics")?
Barbara Olsen was a solid poster over at FreeRepublic. Smart as a tack. Engaged in some great dialog with her at the time (under a different name than what I use to post here). What was weird is how Ted Olsen went gay legal advocate due to a reltionationship he developed with "Meathead" (Rob Reiner) https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/us/19olson.html
They were able to call 1980 for Reagan before California was counted - Reagan's home turf. It was glorious to watch.
"Pier" reviewed? Piers Morgan reviewed? WTF. I can't circulate this with a gross lazy error like that as much as I might otherwise want to do so.
Never trusted the account of that "MKUltra" chick. We're all supposed to just take her word for it are we? Focused all her defamatory accursations on Conservtive icons, none on the dirtiest of deep staters. I believe she was an MKUltra "deflector" - a MKUltra plant meant to seed discord -- and meant to draw attention away from the real deepstate pedo-commiess that ferried in boys from Nebraska for sex parties just like Obama's underlings did.
Her account was meant to besmirch Reagan who was at the time successfully dismantling the Zionist conceived USSR. Zionists are kink pigs (e.g., the pee dossier meant to besmirch Trump) and world wide child sex traffickers. Her accusations are meant to cause conservatives to lose respect for conservative icons, nothing more. The newspaper headline trying to link child expolitation to Reagan got no traction because Reagan personally had nothing to do with it. But it sure was a headline grabber - meant by Reagan's enemies to undo what he successfully had going in tearing down the Communist bloc. Typical Zionist media move.
This chick came out as an MKUltra "victim" at a time when neither Reagan or Hope could defend themselves and file a suit for slander. She is the sole accuser. There are no others who ever accused Reagan of this kind of evil. Don't you think if any of it had a hint of "real" to it, the Zionists would have exploited this long ago to save the fortunes of their then failing World Wwide Communist movement?
Wouldn't it have been cool if when Trump made him the offer he accepted it by giving Trump a salute and addressed him as the Commander in Chief?