Is there any hard evidence for this claim? I would really like to believe this, sounds cool. But I am not going to blindly accept it.

I don't see what's wrong with this. If you purchased strawberries and some went bad in your fridge what do you do? Throw it all out or just remove the bad ones? I remove the bad ones and eat the good ones. When the farmers pick the berries and some are bad what do you think they do?

I think you mean morgellons desease, auto corrected to 4 gallons desease

Yes. I do. You aren't perfect and neither am I.

It says 10 month old.

Singular God. 3 persons. God it all powerful, all good, all knowing, timeless, space less, immaterial, always existing. There are several attributes of god

... Noone is a clone. Replacement Theory is stupid.

What's wrong with this? There is no issue here. They are 10 months apart but the comments say they are 10 months old. So what exactly is the issue other than the post was regurgitated. It's not as though it's being passed ad completely new, with new comments

God has more than 1 attribute

Of God. God has attributes.

Oh my. I had no idea you were so slow. God existed before all creation. Both existence and importance are not creations. They are attributes.

This is not reddit, but for that very reason you should have posted with all relevant sources.

Do you just not know engish well? Or are you very young? You are neither specific, nor did you answer the question without contradiction as you already stated it's " wrong" to have an entity that needs no "whom" because you seem to lack the knowledge that there is such a thing as nessesary existence, or nessesary importance.

nail on the head

Specifically, what is wrong.

Good idea, now I see why you didn't answer with your own thoughts, you would look like a fool. Makes sense.

To whom would be one type of importance. Something can be important to or for something else. But there is also the idea of nessessary existence. Something can hold nessesary importance without need of something else. God is an example of nessesary existence, self-important. There is no "whom" needed.

To that I agree, American tend to come off as child-like, confident, nice, and arrogant to the Japanese, not that Americans are legally more free to express themselves (prabobly are) but culturally, its easier to "feel" that freedom. Speaking to strangers, smiling, making friends it seems americans have much less internal obstacles to do those things.

Old news

Cut off too early. Thats sus. For all I know, he could have turned back around. I don't trust anyone, and i dont trust videos that are cut off very early. They can be taken out of context. Is there a longer version so that I can see for myself that this really was the case?

Lol wonderful cartoon lol

You can express yourself, people will just ignore your self expression. One example: Harajuku style.

You seem to not understand what the word matter means. To matter means to hold importance. To hold importance is a measure of character. God's character is perfect. If for some strange reason you falsely think you must be a subject to matter, then all three persons of the God head matter to heachother.

You should be more clear with your message. It clearly looks like you were answering me with your own thoughts. Since you weren't, im not sure what the point of your response even was.

its all that global warming and probably not eating enough bugs.