Don't you think that if someone stands for truth, it's best to spread information as truthfully as possible? Spreading truthful information with a headline that could easily be misunderstood to convey something untrue undermines itself.
At first within the video the news cast says:
It has the potential to be worth billions to the aerospace industry
- At this moment the title appears accurate. But, the news cast is being misleading.
- The actual NASA employee gave this statement:
This has the potential to generate billions in economic activity.
this shows that the alloy itself is not worth billions, if it were, they wouldn't show exactly how it is made. Instead the technology opens the door for jobs and missions.
There would need to video evidence. The color is related to oxygen saturation, the community note that the color depends on the draw location is accurate. Without a video show where the two blood draws came from, the image means nothing.
Damn, every time I went down a water slide I was actually showing the world I'm a free Mason. every buried person is placed into a freemason position. Oh wait... simple symbol could mean many things and it would be unwise to attribute it to a single specific thing without more direct evidence.
It's the size of a bread box... it's not a star it's a light. They want to put a small light to act as a satellite. The can then measure it's brightness from earth, while knowing it's true brightness. The headline is clickbait
This is some flat earth bull. Wanna prove he has a mask? Facial wrinkle mapping. Want another way? IR camera. But I bet non will do that cause you know deep down he isn't wearing a mask.