What's wrong with this? There is no issue here. They are 10 months apart but the comments say they are 10 months old. So what exactly is the issue other than the post was regurgitated. It's not as though it's being passed ad completely new, with new comments
Do you just not know engish well? Or are you very young? You are neither specific, nor did you answer the question without contradiction as you already stated it's " wrong" to have an entity that needs no "whom" because you seem to lack the knowledge that there is such a thing as nessesary existence, or nessesary importance.
To whom would be one type of importance. Something can be important to or for something else. But there is also the idea of nessessary existence. Something can hold nessesary importance without need of something else. God is an example of nessesary existence, self-important. There is no "whom" needed.
To that I agree, American tend to come off as child-like, confident, nice, and arrogant to the Japanese, not that Americans are legally more free to express themselves (prabobly are) but culturally, its easier to "feel" that freedom. Speaking to strangers, smiling, making friends it seems americans have much less internal obstacles to do those things.
Cut off too early. Thats sus. For all I know, he could have turned back around. I don't trust anyone, and i dont trust videos that are cut off very early. They can be taken out of context. Is there a longer version so that I can see for myself that this really was the case?
You seem to not understand what the word matter means. To matter means to hold importance. To hold importance is a measure of character. God's character is perfect. If for some strange reason you falsely think you must be a subject to matter, then all three persons of the God head matter to heachother.
I think you mean morgellons desease, auto corrected to 4 gallons desease