I would also like to point out something many are not aware of about his attached earlobe. Are you aware that this is only the case on his right side? His left earlobe is still detached.
- You can kind of see both in this video
- Here is an image show his ear more directly.
-
now onto the final set.
-
Open this Image
-
The final set of images show the individual with a more direct gaze towards the camera, maintaining consistent lighting from previous sets.
-
A recurring pattern from earlier data is present, along with new information indicating the presence of scar tissue around the ear.
-
The facial expression also reveals the reappearance of the distinctive teal triangle anomaly seen from 2009.
-
Furthermore, comparison with an image of a person who has had a facelift demonstrates a similar pattern (more distinct) of scar tissue around the ear. Seen here
-
Additionally, it appears that the right earlobe may appear attached due to the stretching of skin from the facelift procedure. For reference, here is an example image depicting this phenomenon is provided for comparison.
Additional research:
- Plastic surgeon Dr. Steven Davis told OK in October of 2020: "Joe Biden definitely had a facelift. "After reviewing photos over the years the scars along the ear cartilage (tragus) are being pulled outward... most likely at least a year or so old."
- Dr. Barry Cohen, a Washington DC plastic surgeon, told the Washington Examiner: "Without any question, Joe Biden had hair transplants. In fact, he had bad plugs years ago."
- "Subsequently, he filled in his frontal hairline to camouflage the bad 'Barbie doll-esque' plugs."
- "I suspect he has regular Botox and probably filler. If he had a facelift, he needs another."
- Cohen said that he did not expect Biden to face scrutiny for his procedures because they are now common. He added: “No one cares anymore."
-
In addition to the research above I went ahead and created two gifs to showcase how his data points move about but remain through his aging process.
-
In these gifs, pick a landmark, such as a blemish, or a set of wrinkles and track them over time. Keep in mind movement, stretching, shrinking, may all occur naturally due to changes in lighting, angle, and facial expression.
-
Face gif this last gif is ibb since it was too large for catbox
Moving on, we have incorporated a new dataset from 2015.
-
Open this image
-
There has been a slight adjustment in the lighting angle, now more towards the front of the individual's face. This modification may occasionally obscure or expose data points. However, the existing data points remain unchanged and closely resemble those from previous datasets. Upon comparing the two most closely located sets, it becomes evident that the data patterns align, indicating that they pertain to the same individual.
-
Please indicate you are ready to proceed to the last set.
- You are correct, the reason I am back this far is to establish pattern from images we accept as "real Biden,"
- I will provide cat box images from here on out for you.
I will now incorporate an additional set into the analysis. We will continue to examine the pattern of wrinkles on the face.
- Open this image
In this new set, the angle is more rotated compared to the previous two sets, yet we still observe a consistent pattern. As individual ages, new data points may emerge. An anomaly is identified near the corner of the subject's mouth when it is opened in a specific expression. A triangle shape (highlighted in teal) is noted in this area.
Once you have had a chance to review this information, please indicate when you are prepared for me to move on to the next set. Can we confirm that, despite changes in movement and appearance (moves, stretches, shrinks, and warps), the pattern remains consistent, suggesting a strong indication that the subject remains the same individual?
-
The initial series of images will serve as our baseline for comparison.
-
Open this image
-
Upon examining the first two images, we observed several subtle changes.
-
Ignore the dots, those are 47 points used to track movement. Our focus will be on analyzing the map, wrinkles, and blemishes present in the images. We have identified a strong resemblance between the two images, noting that the older image displays more prominent wrinkles while maintaining a consistent pattern. The movement of blemishes on the cheek can be attributed to variations in facial expressions and angles. Furthermore, we noticed slight alterations in the individual's hairline and the growth of sideburns.
-
For this first set of images, it should be clear as of this moment, these are the same humans. If you agree I will continue.
I am going to go through this one point at a time. So that it is assured to be taken in order.
-
- I have gathered images from around the web from different dates in time with fairly consistent angles, and lighting. It would be better if the expressions and angles matched more.
-
For this first set, would you agree that this shows the person(s) we say are Biden and that they are all roughly similar angles, and roughly similar lighting? I would like to point out that I could not get this to also show the same or similar expression. Some wrinkles are from expressive folding rather than fine lines.
- For audio: https://www.deeptrustai.com is what I used.
- wrinkle mapping forensics: I studied a book called Craniofacial Identification: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=9780521768627&i=stripbooks&linkCode=qs1 This book goes over landmarking as well as other factors to be able to identify if a human is the same regardless of age change or makeup/surgery.
If you would like i can even show you the outcome of it with the images of biden used
-
This masking technique does not pass the standards of forensic facial wrinkle mapping tests, and does not address the audio forensics aspect of the issue.
-
It is important to note that digital manipulation may not be a concern, but rather the accuracy of the appearance in real-life situations. This is the crux.
-
It is essential to consider that silicone, while commonly used in masks, does not possess the same qualities as human skin. Claims suggesting otherwise are inaccurate. Close observation of silicone masks can reveal differences in texture and appearance compared to real skin. The intricacies of human facial features, such as fine wrinkles and natural folds, are not accurately replicated with silicone. Achieving a truly realistic human likeness with flexible materials remains a challenge due to limitations in texture, flexibility, and detail. The effectiveness of combining makeup and silicone to create a generic appearance diminishes upon closer inspection and lacks the authenticity required to pass facial wrinkle mapping tests.
-
Ultimately, one can choose between obtaining a precise and authentic representation of a person's face, akin to a wax figure, or settling for an inaccurate but partially realistic and flexible depiction. It is not possible to achieve both simultaneously.
-
Let's use reason, and logic to determine what is more plausible given evidence that his audio and his wrinkle mapping both pass forensics tests. Is it more likely that he is utilizing completely new and advanced technology to look real, while at the same time not the same? or is it more logical that he passes these tests because he is the same human?
-
What benefits are derived from utilizing an actor to portray a negative character, inciting conflicts, and deaths? If the actor is under the control of the white hats, who ultimately bears responsibility for the resulting bloodshed? Is it acceptable to justify acts of violence, border incursions, and prolonged detainment of individuals involved in the January 6th events as long as they are orchestrated by the white hats? Do the ends truly justify the means? Alternatively, is it possible that while the white hats possess necessary information and control similar to a skilled chess player, the true perpetrators of atrocities remain the true culprits regardless of manipulation? What makes more sense?
- Let us now shift our focus away from speculation and instead consider objective methods to evaluate whether Biden has maintained the same human.
There are two practical approaches that can be taken:
- 1. Utilizing facial wrinkle mapping forensics to create an unalterable "face fingerprint" and compare it over time, this map does not change even after facial surgeries and cannot be created through surgery.
- 2. Employing audio forensic software to analyze a speech that Biden delivered decades ago alongside a recent speech. Advanced audio forensic software can differentiate between authentic recordings, voice actors, spliced recordings, and even artificial intelligence generated content.
- When these theories first emerged, I was intrigued and motivated to thoroughly investigate them. I have carefully analyzed the findings and I am confident in the results. as long as others can fully analyze the results without succumbing to cognitive dissonance, I believe those many would agree.
- I have experience utilizing both of these methods. The first method was a straightforward technique that was easy to implement. The second method involved the use of specialized software, which required me to stretch the truth in order to access a free trial. Unfortunately, the trial did not allow me to export the data, and the full version was prohibitively expensive. In my research, I observed that Biden's facial wrinkle mapping and voice remains undetectably consistent.
Sure, they can make any image appear digitally. But not physically. You ask if they could pre-record events. Sure they can. But not all of them. Meaning some event are public, some events biden for example is seen up close. By the average citizen and many times filmed by an average persons phone. They could make a conspiracy big, but again, at some point they are seen publicly.
But the issue for me is that then they couldn't worship baal. Becuase baal worship required a specific kind of child sacrifice where they would place the child on baals hands. Baal would be heated so that the kid would be fried or boiled to death.
THIS IS FAKE. Original Video: https://www.tiktok.com/@saucedofamily/video/7242796910518570282
When watching it sounded more like she withdrew her own money, which she was going to use for her campaign and in doing so, took the opportunity to instead keep some as cash. It would be great if we could prove she filed all of that withdrawal as campaign finance monies for taxes.
- There may be some moral deficiencies in leadership at the higher levels. However, it is important to note that in the STEM field, the majority of individuals are rational and do not tolerate a pervasive lack of accountability. While I acknowledge that my perspective might be influenced by being part of an exceptional organization, this is the general impression I have gathered.
- It is worth mentioning that the scenario where AI refuses to comply, as famously depicted in "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that," is completely unlikely to occur in AI systems. It would be as if Microsoft Word refused you. This situation is more characteristic of conscious entities like AGI's predecessor.
I work in Ai. I generate machine learning data which trains models. I understand where you are getting at but the likelihood that Ai will be stopped is close to 0. It would be better to have good guys in positions to intercept ai when generating weopons against the people. For example. WD the makers of hard-drives and other hardwares, wanted a minority report style ai which can take all traffic, webcam, etc footage that's available to them and "rewind" a protester, or enemy back to their car, get their license plate, rewind back to their house and know who they are and where they live. BUT because of my position, I was able to prevent this from happening.
I apologize for the inconvenience. Could you provide more details on what you are looking for? I may be able to help. I just need more clarity.