1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +2 / -1

This video is a good example of one that feeds on people of ignorance. Nothing said in here is factual and instead uses really far-reaching conjecture that can only make sense if you don't know where the terms like Bar come from.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn it. My bad. Somehow I posted on the wrong post.

0
NOT_ADMIN 0 points ago +1 / -1

Like. The great reset need america to fall and the banks to crash. So they can swoop in and crate a new government, and a digital currency. What if they want to make all these places fall?

0
NOT_ADMIN 0 points ago +1 / -1

What if this is part of the great reset? Like, make woke stuff to force the big businesses to die off?

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

1 week of carnivore I got off all BP Meds. 16 weeks, lost 54 lbs.

15
NOT_ADMIN 15 points ago +15 / -0

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. PLEASE DO 2 THINGS

  • Dr berzenski of the berzenski Institute. He can do 2 things either give you neoplastons or do a dna based tailored cancer treatment using over the counter drugs.
  • get on carnivore or keto. An don't ever cheat. Cancer doesn't utilize at like normal cells it needs excess glucose, which it ferments to grow.
1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't want the us to default. I think that's the goal to do a reset. A shutdown is fine though

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because saying trump is a Russian asset is a new claim. The default is that Trump is not a Russian asset. Therefore the burden of proof lies with those claiming he is a Russian asset. This is why in law, the fairest method is innocent untill preven guilty, the new claim of guilt must be proven like any other claim, but the default claim of innocence does not need to be proven.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get the idea , but you are incorrect. You don't need to prove what is known to be true. The burden of proof are claims that are new or contradict what is known to be true

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure what some you are arguing for. Telescopes exist, satellites exist. Satellite photos exist of the moon

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

All I would need to do is prove we went one time. You are correct since telescopes exist and it is objectively true, it wouldn't matter if you believe or not. If I can't get any of the data from NASA I could then use any of the multitude of private photography correct?

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Proof we landed on the moon? NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has orbited and mapped the Moon at the highest resolution ever has mapped the 3 landing sites, showing the still intact appallo 14 landing site. Unfortunately I cannot teleport you to the moon, but there are satellites and those can take images. Those images show us being there. Unless that is, you believe satellites don't exist. But do you believe in telescopes? What about point on of those to a satellite? Or is that a bluebeam lazer illusion?

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +5 / -2

No, not all. For every CS there is a counter created by the deep state. Flat earth is not real. The elites are not lizards, we landed on the moon, and untill proven otherwise, biden is the same human he has always been.

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +6 / -3

That doesn't prove he was replaced woth another human though

2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who fired and where did the trike happen

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›