2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, she's one of the more interesting and semi-sane members of Congress. Not MAGA by a long shot but not consistently evil. A bit of an enigma to me (I haven't spent much time looking into her, so take my comments with a grain of salt), rather like the New and Improved Fetterman.

4
Narg 4 points ago +4 / -0

Could be. But we're gonna get Trump 47, a swamp draining, and MAGA instead of a flood.

Or perhaps what's coming could be considered a Flood of righteousness and sanity, washing away the evil and sickness.

It won't be just America that is healed, either.

10
Narg 10 points ago +10 / -0

Holee Shite.

The once-Free-World has is becoming a mix of Mao's Red China, Stalin's Soviet Union, and Hitler's Germany. Stridently woke, darkly oppressive, and quick to sanction or imprison (or worse) any who dissent.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the link! Yes, he's got talent.

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the links; great post. Yes, this is a topic we need to be very aware of.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow. I have no idea how it'll go in the senate, but I do think things won't really start getting healed until Trump is back in the White House, by whatever means.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

The federal House of Representatives can impeach a party with a simple majority of the House members present or such other criteria as the House adopts in accordance with Article One, Section 2, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. This triggers a federal impeachment trial in the United States Senate, which can vote by a 2/3 majority to convict an official, removing them from office. The Senate can also further, with just a simple-majority vote, vote to bar an individual convicted in a senate impeachment trial from holding future federal office.

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States

or see https://www.usa.gov/impeachment

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

The federal House of Representatives can impeach a party with a simple majority of the House members present or such other criteria as the House adopts in accordance with Article One, Section 2, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. This triggers a federal impeachment trial in the United States Senate, which can vote by a 2/3 majority to convict an official, removing them from office. The Senate can also further, with just a simple-majority vote, vote to bar an individual convicted in a senate impeachment trial from holding future federal office.

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States

or see https://www.usa.gov/impeachment

5
Narg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tucker's world-wide REACH right now is epic; more people are watching his interviews and other content than all the cable shows combined, is my guess.

He's doing the most he CAN do for America and for humanity right now, where he is. Let someone else do the VP job.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you are right, certainly about a tiny elite having most of the wealth, and Putin is known to have incredible personal wealth, which he didn't earn by honest business practices. Also, Putin's political opponents keep dying or getting arrested.

On the other hand, I believe Putin is sincere on A) supporting traditional values in Russia, including Christianity, and B) wanting to End the Cabal as much as Trump does. No, I don't think he's as benign as Trump, but he is a strong ally in those two areas.

I see Putin as similar to Muammar Gaddafi -- a brutal dictator who actually loves his country, wants it to prosper, but definitely sees himself personally as the ruler of the land and will not tolerate opposition to his policies.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you didn't mention Google, but I did -- in the post headline, twice. And surely you understood that I'm not just interested in Google in particular (that's only the example for this post; as I also said in the headline, this is ANOTHER of these occasional tests) but in the overall search environment, AI and otherwise, that people use to get information from.

Most of that environment is heavily compromised, with censorship by omission and otherwise the norm on any topic the Cabal is interested in.

On "non-sensitive" subjects, most search tools (again, AI and otherwise) provide relatively faithful answers, and are often so good at it that people are impressed. That makes it all the more important that people know that on PARTICULAR subjects, they are being gaslit and lied to, directly (calling accurate reporting, truthful commentary, and actual scientific studies "misinformation", for example) and by omission.

It is for that reason that I added "Google vs Reality" to the headline; this particular post shows a query and answers to/from Google, and the very serious reality of the harms and dangers from the COVID vaccines are ignored and downplayed in the response.

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Terrific comment.

Also, you user name made me LOL; thanks for that little bit of joy.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seriously? You think you're getting anything close to REALITY from Google? Or from most other search engines or AI?

I think I've been very clear on my point: Most search, including most AI queries of Cabal-adjacent subjects, are heavily censored. If you disagree with that, you're welcome to your opinion but then MY opinion is you're a bot, a troll, or a fed.

1
Narg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm doing it with BOTH AIs and with standard search engines. The point is to find what level of honest response the public is getting when they look for answers to Cabal-censored topics on the web.

Here's my previous example of Gab AI versus versus ARC AI:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOnoUhUp/honesty-test-gabs-new-ai-vs-arc-/

And here's another example of a dishonest AI:

https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5ay7GF6/new-frontiers-in-censorship-ai-d/

4
Narg 4 points ago +4 / -0

. . . and Kelce announces people should ignore everything he's said before about taking the Death Shots, and warns the public to stay away from them . . .

A nice fantasy, but I'm not expecting any sort of turn-around from the Dark Side for these two sell-outs.

4
Narg 4 points ago +4 / -0

They were like the girl above, being outraged without a target.

Today, the American people can see the target: it is the uni-party.

That sounds like The Great Awakening in a nutshell. Nice!

2
Narg 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a comment particularly relevant to The Great Awakening itself.

Q talks about Unity a LOT, and for good reason.

Example. Holding a debate between those that believe in a God-created universe vs those that believe in an evolution created universe,

And THAT is a particularly relevant example, here.

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

It didn't use to be and it won't be in the future. Mickey Mantle and Chris Everett didn't get treated this way, and a decade from now -- or much sooner, I hope -- this neurotic, malicious hatred for the genuine hard-earned success of anyone not in a favored group will be just a bad memory.

3
Narg 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of the major things that happens when Communist take over a country is they destroy the past via removing statues, street names, renaming towns and cities and rewriting history as well as killing and removing opposition to the new government.

EXCELLENT point, and it needs more exposure.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›