Except it’s staged… still hilarious, but very staged…
Well done, brother!
I look forward to the day that I get to contribute something to the cause that rivals this post.
What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
Legit schizoposting, on my GAW?!? Damn tonight has been fun... lol
Good on ya! Don't know if I would have shared that here though...I try to keep pretty specific opsec between my different social media accounts. Which is fun...It would be pretty damn hard to doxx me, but I guarantee you our enemy knows exactly who I am, down to the social security number.
Sup, fags? You guys gettin desperate? The fun part is just around the corner...we will show you the exact same amount of mercy that you showed each and every person you tormented while developing your devices... Be seeing you soon!!!
You and me both, brother. I am an honest man (to a fault in social situations...it comes along with the aspergers) and am always genuine with others. I am also goofy and sarcastic, and can be a massive dick to my friends for fun. Apparently that last part attracts actual assholes to try and hang around me sometimes, but I have gotten pretty good at spotting them from a mile away.
EDIT: When I say be a massive dick, I mean shit talking and banter. I'll never do anything to actually cross or harm a friend in any way, shape, or form...I'm one of the most loyal people you'll ever meet if you deserve for me to be.
Has it ever occurred to you that we are fighting a war here and those weather weapons that were used are, indeed, weapons?!?
Are you dense?
Have you not considered the fact that our enemy are the ones who designed and built these devices and might still control some of them?
Stop letting emotions get in the way and use your brain, soldier.
Right?
The author is a real piece of work too. Didn't have to dig deep into his twitter page to find him shit talking Dan Bongino and praising Stephen King in the same breath.
Claims to be an expert on geopolitics and infosec, but is clearly either a clown or a fool (or both). Still an interesting topic and a good write up. It's laughable how the author can describe the tactic that is so clearly being used against us, and at the same time defend the exact outlets that are the main perpetrators of the tactic.
"My vision is to be able to create a system which can help people who experience online harassment have charges automatically for them against the individuals which engage in harassment as a part of a larger behavioral conditioning network."
Actual quote from the psycho leftard that thinks Musk is using Soviet Tactics to...idk, bully people online and in doing so spread disinfo? Peak Schizoposting, for sure.
I gotchu! Yeah, I didn't realize just how big of a wall of text it was till I started copying it over to here! I guess I did spend a good 15 or so minutes reading and digesting it...
Thanks!!!
International Law and Norms
Reflexive control presents a unique challenge to the existing legal frameworks in international law. Its covert and psychological nature makes it difficult to detect, attribute, and regulate. Traditional legal mechanisms and international norms are often ill-equipped to address the subtleties and complexities of psychological manipulation in statecraft.
One of the key challenges in regulating reflexive control is the issue of attribution. The indirect and often subtle nature of these strategies makes it difficult to clearly attribute actions to a particular state or actor. This lack of clear attribution complicates efforts to hold states accountable for their actions under international law.
Furthermore, the current international legal framework largely focuses on overt acts of aggression or interference. Reflexive control, which operates in the realms of psychology and information, does not fit neatly into these categories. This creates a legal grey area where actions that can have significant geopolitical impacts fall outside the scope of existing international law.
The impact of reflexive control on human psychology also poses unique legal challenges. The manipulation of beliefs and perceptions can have profound effects on individual and collective decision-making processes. This raises questions about the responsibility of states to protect the psychological well-being of their citizens and the global community.
The development of new legal and ethical norms to address the challenges posed by reflexive control is crucial. This includes the establishment of international standards for the responsible use of information and psychological strategies in statecraft. It also involves the development of mechanisms for monitoring, attribution, and accountability to ensure that states adhere to these standards.
Moreover, there is a need for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between information manipulation, psychological warfare, and international law. This understanding should inform the development of new legal frameworks and ethical guidelines that are capable of addressing the complexities and evolving nature of statecraft in the digital age.
Conclusion
The study of the Soviet theory of reflexive control offers invaluable insights into the psychology of international relations and modern warfare. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of information manipulation tactics and the importance of ethical considerations in statecraft. As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, the legacy of this theory continues to influence strategies on the global stage, reminding us of the enduring power of the human mind in shaping history.
Global Implications
The global ramifications of these contemporary forms of reflexive control are far-reaching and deeply concerning. They represent a paradigm shift in how information warfare is conducted, with implications that span the entire spectrum of international relations and global stability.
One of the most significant impacts of these tactics is the erosion of trust in democratic institutions and the media. By blurring the lines between fact and fiction, these strategies foster a climate of skepticism and cynicism, undermining the public's trust in traditional sources of information. This erosion of trust has profound implications for democratic governance, as it hampers the ability of citizens to make informed decisions and hold their leaders accountable.
The use of digital reflexive control strategies also contributes to the polarization of societies. By amplifying divisive narratives and exploiting societal fractures, these tactics exacerbate tensions and deepen existing divides. This polarization can lead to increased social unrest, political instability, and even conflict, as groups become more entrenched in their views and less willing to engage in constructive dialogue.
Moreover, the global reach of these strategies challenges the very foundations of international law and order. They operate in a grey area of international law, often bypassing traditional mechanisms of accountability and oversight. This poses significant challenges for international regulatory frameworks, which are often ill-equipped to deal with the rapidly evolving nature of digital warfare and information manipulation.
The economic implications are also profound. The manipulation of information can have dramatic effects on markets, trade relations, and economic stability. Misinformation campaigns can damage the reputation of companies, influence consumer behavior, and sway regulatory policies, leading to significant economic consequences.
Culturally, the impact of digital reflexive control strategies extends to shaping societal values and norms. By influencing what information is disseminated and consumed, these tactics play a role in defining cultural narratives and shaping public opinion on issues ranging from human rights to environmental policies.
Ethical and Moral Considerations
Ethical Analysis
The ethical implications of reflexive control in statecraft are profound and multifaceted. At its core, reflexive control involves the deliberate manipulation of information to influence decision-making processes. This raises fundamental ethical concerns about the integrity of communication and the respect for truth in international relations. The practice challenges the ethical principles of transparency and honesty, which are foundational to building trust and mutual respect among nations.
The moral quandaries posed by reflexive control extend to the concept of autonomy. By manipulating perceptions and information, states employing reflexive control strategies effectively undermine the autonomous decision-making of other nations and their citizens. This raises questions about the respect for sovereignty and the right of nations and individuals to make free and informed decisions.
Furthermore, the covert nature of reflexive control adds another layer of ethical complexity. The use of deception and hidden influence in international relations undermines the principle of informed consent, which is central to ethical interactions. This deception can lead to decisions that may not align with the true interests or values of the manipulated party, raising concerns about the exploitation of vulnerabilities and the ethics of influence.
In addition, the ethical implications of reflexive control are not limited to international relations. The manipulation of public opinion within a state's own borders raises serious ethical questions about the legitimacy of a government's actions and its respect for the rights and welfare of its citizens. The use of state machinery to manipulate public opinion undermines democratic principles and the fundamental rights of individuals to access accurate information and engage in free and open discourse.
Influence on Other Nations
The reach of Soviet reflexive control extended far beyond the borders of the USSR, influencing both its allies and adversaries around the world. During the Cold War, the principles of reflexive control became a significant aspect of the ideological struggle between East and West, adopted and adapted by various countries based on their alignment and interests.
For nations aligned with the Soviet Union, reflexive control offered a strategic framework consistent with socialist and communist ideologies. These countries often employed similar tactics to manipulate public opinion and decision-making processes, both domestically and in their dealings with other nations. The use of reflexive control in these countries was often geared towards maintaining the status quo, suppressing dissent, and promoting the state's interests.
On the other hand, countries opposed to the Soviet Union faced the challenge of understanding and countering these subtle tactics. This led to the development of various counter-strategies and psychological operations aimed at neutralizing the effects of Soviet influence. Western intelligence agencies, for example, invested considerable resources in understanding the mechanisms of reflexive control, developing their psychological warfare capabilities, and training personnel to recognize and resist such manipulation.
Furthermore, the principles of reflexive control found their way into the broader international arena, influencing non-aligned nations and shaping the conduct of international diplomacy. The subtle nature of these tactics made them particularly effective in scenarios where overt military or political actions were not feasible or desirable. This led to a global landscape in which psychological manipulation became an integral part of international relations, with long-lasting impacts on global politics and the conduct of statecraft.
The legacy of Soviet reflexive control thus extends beyond the Cold War, continuing to influence the strategies and policies of nations around the world. Its principles have been adapted to new contexts and technologies, shaping the modern landscape of information warfare and international diplomacy.
Modern Interpretations and Applications
Contemporary Relevance
In the digital epoch, the Soviet concept of reflexive control has morphed into a myriad of sophisticated forms, resonating profoundly with the contemporary strategies of cyber warfare, social media manipulation, and the rampant proliferation of disinformation, colloquially termed "fake news". This evolution marks a significant shift from the traditional, more overt forms of psychological warfare to a nuanced, technology-driven approach that leverages the vast, interconnected expanse of the digital landscape.
Modern incarnations of reflexive control employ cutting-edge algorithms, the expansive reach of social media platforms, and the pervasive influence of digital media to craft and disseminate targeted misinformation, thus orchestrating public discourse. This is not merely about broadcasting false information; it's about strategically shaping the narrative to achieve specific goals. By exploiting the interconnected nature of the digital world, actors can amplify certain narratives, suppress others, and create a meticulously controlled information environment. This environment is designed to subtly influence decision-making processes at both individual and collective levels, on a global scale.
The digital transformation of reflexive control extends to exploiting data analytics and behavioral science to understand and influence public sentiment. Actors use these insights to craft messages that resonate deeply with specific demographics, exploiting vulnerabilities and biases in human psychology. The resulting echo chambers and filter bubbles reinforce existing beliefs and narratives, further polarizing public opinion and shaping political discourse.
These modern methods are not limited to state actors. Non-state entities, including terrorist organizations, multinational corporations, and special interest groups, have also harnessed the power of digital reflexive control. They use these tactics to advance their agendas, influence regulatory decisions, sway public opinion on critical issues, and even manipulate stock markets.
Thanks. Are you going to paste the rest of it that got cut off? If not, I will.
It's a long read, but pretty dang illuminative!
Interestingly enough, I found this article through reading some leftard schizoposting that accuses Elon Musk of being the grand puppet master behind January 6th rofl...
Here's the link to that:
This guy is all sorts of unhinged. Claiming a system that is very clearly being leveraged by the globalists is only being used by our side. Entertaining, albeit sad and pathetic.
If I interpreted the comments correctly, the actual post linked to was someone copying and pasting someone else’s post from a different subreddit. The emojis may have been added in to mock what the original author was writing.
Hope that helps!
Where are you getting the 12:31 timestamp from? Neither the Q drop nor the Trump tweet are from that time…..
Brain dead very rarely makes sure things are current before using titles that imply something is new or just now happening. Welcome to GAW :\
"I thought maybe UFOs but now I’m thinking flying nukes. Probably neither."
I'm thinking it's gonna be both... The enemy launches nukes, and we use our HAUCs (Hybrid Aerospace/Undersea Craft) to detonate them in outer space.
Talk about fireworks!!!
Said people want Q to mean what they want it to mean and absolutely don’t care what was actually said.
They are generally aggressively retarded, and will likely be included in the “4-6%”
The other ones that really piss me off are the “galactic federation” “crystallize your DNA” cultists. 😡
“Marks the” doesn’t show up anywhere, nor does “marks the spot” or “x marks.”
https://qagg.news/?q=The+spot&q2=
Searching for “the spot” only returns usage of the phrase “the spotlight”.
That’s because it’s not said in the drops. Not a single time.
Ashbetger…? You mean Asperger’s?
lol no.
We have grid ready fusion reactors at least, and quite possibly quantum vacuum state energy harvesting (zero point energy).
Solar and Wind is about kickbacks for politicians and nothing else.