Except nothing in this video is evidence of any of that. It's completely benign and the title is an outright fabrication in totality.

"Dr. Fauci, how do we get novel methods adopted?"

"Go through the regular process and have it work"

OMG THEY WERE PLANNING THIS

"Random dude, what might the future look like?"

"Imagine some crazy virus appears, we could sequence the RNA and people could download that sequence, print their own vaccine and self administer"

Jesus fuck you guys, when you have the winning argument don't throw it away to chase make believe.

That is NOT in ANY WAY what is discussed in this video. The title is FAKE FUCKING NEWS.

They are discussing what the path would be to introduce novel methods for vaccination. Fauci's case is that it has to go through the whole parocess and work. The other dude is opinining years in the future that some novel avian fluv could appear and the technology would allow you to produce a vaccine in your home from just the rna sequence downloaded from front line researchers and self administered.

No where do they plot a health scare staged or otherwise. Literal fake news.

What does this have to do with FB?

Nothing that's what.

You haven't argued a single fact.

"Modified" is inappropriate terminology, words matter, and you've done nothing but argue your credentials and say, "nu-uh"

If your argument works against your rephrasing, but not against my unaltered statement, it's not semantics.

Can you pick a goal post and stick with it?\

I'm not saying my 7 years make me an authority figure, I'm saying they make me immune to your appeal to authority. You're not an authority over me in the subject matter, so you have to appeal to the facts and the argument rather than your supposed authority.

Do you even know what an appeal to authority is? Do you understand levels of argument?

Why would I be mad for calling you out for directly contradicting yourself.

Can you tell me why low IQ people post emojis when they realize they've lost?

It's also just a computer model study. Great for first looks, not something you would consider conclusive in any measure. Additionally, I'd much prefer the drug interfere with something that can't be so easily adapted around.

Then you merely vote tribalist, because in your heart you think the state ought to decide the value and fate of individuals. You'd love mask mandates (if only Trump was mandating it). If Trump said no one needs a million dollars and it's theft from the greater good of society you'd totally on board redistributing that for the greater good of freedom and liberty and the american dream.

You're the kind of person that reads "patriot act" and fist pumps, 'hell ya brother'.

I've directly addressed each of your arguments. You're now being disingenuous.

Strongest one is name calling

strongest one you can think to use is name calling

Can you tell the difference between these two statements?

We can't allow trading of this stock, price discovery may valuate it below where people in charge are ok with it being. What? No I don't know how a free market works and I don't care.

Thank you for outing yourself as the anti-capitalist marxist that you are

When you have all these avenues of response available to you and the strongest one you can think to use is name calling, you might as well admit to yourself that your argument doesn't have any ground to stand on - Because that's all I read from it.

I’ve worked in design, print, and image processing for 20 years. Don’t fucking talk down like you’re the expert.

This isn’t appeal to authority.

Fucking lul

When we go all, it's because we all made that choice all ourselves and the where just so happened to be the same, not because Q decided the direction and if you weren't with it then you were acting selfishly outside the benefit of the state and should be lined up against the wall.

And it IS Marxist propoganda that marxists use because as I've said before I have ssen this exact same shit posted and discussed by them. I'm surrounded by them. But hey, ignore me because that's easier on your soul in the short run than the ounce of self reflection that may lead to a hit to your ego when you realize you were eating up marxist doctrine without realizing.

There is no discussion because I'm not discussing it. I'm telling you that this is Marxist dogma, that it was posted and stickied unironically, and you're fools for not recognizing your enemy when you see them. "But if I get to decide the definition of a selfish cell rather than some commie, that makes it ok!" Jesus fuck no

I'm not defending the compression, and pushing back on describing that compression as "modifying". Words matter.

So you believe in Marxism.

Your only problem is that the Marxists are picking the wrong people to put up against the wall, and IF YOU had been at the head of one of the last communist dictatorships it totally wouldn't have failed because you would have chosen the correct parasites to execute.

How nice to know that you think that you get to decide who is acting 'selfish' and 'not in the interests of the state' and believe you (or someone else) should be empowered to deal with that self declared selfishness.

You're a Marxist. This thread is filled with closet Marxists because apparently no one has warned you about where that thinking leads.

Communists believe the rich have stolen from the poor. That's one of their axiomatic principles - that wealth is zero sum so for someone to get money that means someone involved in their production flow is NOT getting that money and one can infer any disparitiy in compensation as theft - they believe 8 hours is 8 hours, and make no distinction for skill or scarcity.

How do you not know what a communist is?? Where the fuck do you live that you've never interacted with them even on line?? Don't call me retarded, I can out IQ you any fucking day of the week.

I'm starting to think I'm arguing with closet marxists here. "Communism only executes the cancerous" holy shit that's the sort of revisionist apologist shit only the profoundly naive or a literal symnpathizer would assert.