1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weirdly it's from around Aug-Sept 2020. At least that's the earliest I've seen it uploaded to the internet. Possibly from the 2019 Campaign trail, then uploaded later? Or it could be from a State that wasn't enforcing masks in your car. If you look closely the Cops that come to arrest her have black face N95 masks on.

17
Orwellian_Scholar 17 points ago +17 / -0

I remember that one! Doesn't he try to spit on the Patriots Trump flag then drive away and instatly loses control?

Found it, sorry it's a youtube link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oxpeSCKTGc

Enjoy!

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

If authorized by the DoD they will shoot you, and they will use the excuse of political violence to engage you with deadly force while teamed with normal cops/sheriffs.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your levels of ' deadly force?' My interpretation is they are referring to the Military, National Guard etcetera.

There's a big difference to being engaged by Cops, Sheriffs, etcetera vs trained military men armed with a much more deadly arsenal and set of skills.

This would be the reason I think it's a "big deal" when they authorize deadly force to our Military against Us while 'assisting' L.E.

I don't know how you came to the conclusion that "it doesn't matter because they are already doing it." From my understanding this new Directive expands upon the rules authorizing force against a civilian, or groups of civilians at the behest of the DoD. Normally this would be foreign combatants, terrorists, etcetera.

This corrupt administration and our compromised Congress have been conducting concocted schemes similar to this for a long time. Stacking bills that don't do anything initially, but then they interconnect to other bills and suddenly the combination of these new rules screws the people. This just seems to be another instance of the same, yet much more alarming considering the political climate and our shared enemies. (The Cabal/Deep State)

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if this is the case,reading the other document that you are referring to states in the section on the use of deadly force: "Deadly force may only be used when reasonable, including, but not limited to, under the following circumstances: (f) Performing an arrest or apprehension, or preventing escape. Authorized DoD personnel may use deadly force to arrest, apprehend, or prevent the unlawful escape of a fleeing subject if there is probable cause to believe:

  1. The subject has committed an offense involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical injury or death; and
  2. The escape of the subject would pose an actual or imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to DoD personnel or others in the vicinity."

This is stated in 3.4 (USE OF FORCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. ). e 4 (f) (pages 17 & 18)

My interpretation of this combined with the new Directive is that the DoD may use deadly force if they perceive you to be a threat and fleeing the scene. (To me this will be used as the excuse to start shooting us when we have the election stolen from us a second time and we go to protest. There will be a false flag and the Commies will authorize the DoD to take us out.

I can see that you're right about the authorization, but you must also take into consideration that the current Administration is full of Traitors. Llyod Austin is one of them. Do you really think he would hesitate to authorize deadly force against us Patriots?

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/521056p.PDF?ver=PIvIb3eht0obgolnD0UCEw%3d%3d

(Sorry about the late reply I was at work)

13
Orwellian_Scholar 13 points ago +13 / -0

Page 13: 3.3 a c:

Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation

between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.

Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support.

2
Orwellian_Scholar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was exactly the point of that song. It's a condemnation of the US, but normies just play it on the 4th of July due to the chorus while ignoring the obvious vitriol in the verses.

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

His song "Born in the USA" is not 'Patriotic' either. Many people mistake it as such because of the chorus. But if you actually study the lyrics to the song it's a cricism of the US, and no one should be playing it on the 4th July. He's a Commie, always was and will be.

https://genius.com/Bruce-springsteen-born-in-the-usa-lyrics

4
Orwellian_Scholar 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm of the opinion that these failures are being done on purpose. One it helps big companies like Microsft buy out dead or dying studios who are trapped into DEI contracts. Two, I believe it's part of shrinking our entertainment. When Rome was collapsing, all the people wanted was more bread, more wine, and more circus. We're losing the "circus" more and more every day. We are losing that digital escapism from this reality. It could even be a part of the plan to pull us away from the TV and Computer and bring us back to nature and God.

4
Orwellian_Scholar 4 points ago +4 / -0

The reviewer mentions a the 24-ish minute mark that Kibblesmith used to be the Head writer for Stephen Colbert. No wonder every joke is a bomb, and the dialogue is terrible.

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone should post this to Will Scharf. This douche is committing a crime. 'Social Media Libel.' Trump is NOT a Convicted Felon, sentencing has not been given, and it might not happen at all now.

https://vxtwitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1808606852713705869

Charlie Kirk asks Scharf about the media constantly using this term and the legal ramifications.

I'm sure Scharf will scent the blood in the water... Skip to 0:37 into this interview you'll see what I mean.

3
Orwellian_Scholar 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are two FBI buildings near here. One south of Ford's Theatre, just across the street and one 3 blocks east of the Capital One Arena.

The one south of Ford's Theatre is the HQ. So I'm guessing the other one is just a field office.

2
Orwellian_Scholar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That comment from Palmer Report, on X, is Social Media Defamation Libel.

"Convicted Felon shot while awaiting criminal trial" https://july13th.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IMG_8148.jpg

Here's a quick snippet of an interview between Charlie Kirk and Will Scharf:

https://vxtwitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1808606852713705869

Hope Scharf gets them to take it down, and apologize. If not pretty sure he can sue them.

2
Orwellian_Scholar 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's Sony. Sony own most of the major anime studios, they also own most of the manga printer distributers in the West.

I did a dig a long time ago, and that was the conclusion. Everything lead back to Sony. I think they are also behind the anime streaming service Crunchyroll. https://www.sonypictures.com/corp/press_releases/2021/0809/sonysfunimationglobalgroupcompletesacquisitionofcrunchyrollfromatt

Funimation is a Sony owned company that is behind most popular anime shows.

https://myanimelist.net/anime/producer/102/Funimation

So yes, it's probably the Pedo Cabal.

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's because even though they got 14% of the vote the only won in 4 Counties. Something like 0.6% of the UK. Lib Dems have more reps in more counties spread out, that they won.

They have been arguing about changing the voting to proportial based, instead of FPTP (First Past The Post) but can never come to an agreement.

2
Orwellian_Scholar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That shark-like grin at 0:38... If I was the MSM I'd be terrified. xD

8
Orwellian_Scholar 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's Big Dick energy right there... ;)

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems to be gone. Maybe they shut it down when the FEC/FBI Gestapo started investigating it?

https://www.donaldjtrump.com also leads straight to the WINRED donation page.

Then again, Ronna was booted and now we have Michael Whatley as Chair, and Lara Trump as Co-chair. So maybe he's using WINRED RNC as he is the Lead Candidate?

I can only speculate, and I apologize for the pigs ear I've just made of your thread if that's the case.

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are correct. This is not the Save America fund, it's the WINRED RNC. Remember when they stole all our money and didn't lift a finger in 2020-2021?

In fact Ronna McDaniel (Romney) spent all our donations on High End Hotels, and restaurants.

2
Orwellian_Scholar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Byron yes, Tulsi? Hell No!

https://thegunzone.com/where-does-tulsi-gabbard-stand-on-gun-control/

She is a textbook manchurian candidate. Changing her stance to gain popularity. She did the illuminati hand signal on the steps of the Capitol.Context

Her other political views in 2019. (Her real views, don't be fooled) https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-does-rep-tulsi-gabbard-believe-where-the-candidate-stands-on-7-issues

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Out of nearly all the candidates for President, Trump is the only one eligible if you follow the Federalist Papers, the Consistution and the laws (The Laws of Nations) they were based on, plus the Naturalization Act of 1790. These all describe how a Natural Born Citizen is defined.

https://www.scribd.com/lists/22182725/Some-Politicians-Seeking-High-Office-Who-Are-Not-A-Natural-Born-Citizen-of-U-S

1
Orwellian_Scholar 1 point ago +1 / -0

That post needs to come with a Not Safe For Life Tag. NSFW. Disgusting. I'll be right back, need to bleach my eyes, and I'm a faggot. Just not THAT much of a faggot.

3
Orwellian_Scholar 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is quite interesting. I've also been lead to believe it always falls on the 21st of the month.

Reading more into it I see it's because of time zones.

"The winter solstice in 2023 will occur on Thursday, December 21, 2023, at 9:27 pm CST in Wichita, Kansas, USA, which corresponds to Friday, December 22, 2023, at 03:27 UTC."

I'm -5 UTC so for me it's the 21st.

I've discovered the name of the song is Puccini's 'Nessum Dorma' and in the video it's sang by Pavarotti. The lyrics I messed up. It's 'at dawn, I will win.'

Also I wrote 'Dawn of 2023' should say 2024. And I messed up Equinox and Solstice.

Sorry, my post was a stream of consciousness moment. As is this reply.

view more: Next ›