Heard a discussion on this over the weekend (DPH).
“authorized to kill Americans on US soil … I think it’s very, very dangerous.”
Apparently, this is not the case. That authority was always there. Are you going to mobilize the military into extreme emergency situations (i.e. insurrection) and NOT give them authority to use what and who they are?
The Military has ALWAYS been authorized to use lethal force when necessary. That's the entire reason for the whole Posse Comitatus Act in the first place. As far as I understand.
Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury – certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations (at home and abroad).
As long as it isn't against true American people like a Pol Pot or Bolshevik situation.
maybe that's why the mil assets were held up from going in to NC for so long, they were waiting on their title X orders for almost a week. that creates a backlash that makes it easier to activate them CONUS. for WH or BH.
The idea is FAFO - what I think scares most is the fact that the government isn't so good to obeying laws and having integrity in any capacity... so take someone who doesn't ever FA - they certainly don't want or deserve to FO.
Only the U.S. Congress can grant that authority. DoD is just getting their paperwork in order in the event they get Congressional Authority. They do this every so often to keep the paperwork up to date.
The National Guard was called in by the Governor of Ohio resulting in the killing of 4 students and the injuring of 9 others at Kent State University on May 5th, 1970 during anti-war protests. These protests were mild compared to what I fear will come with antifa being activated.
As I understand it, National Guard exists because regular military was not allowed to act domestically and, even with that, the NG has limited ability to take action with citizens which is why they coordinate with local law enforcement for arrests and other more "interactive" public activities
There is pretty good evidence that Soviets were behind the scenes at Kent State (and other universities at the time), stirring up the anti-war protests, leading to the shootings (but it was some too-scared National Guardsmen ultimately at fault; the crowd was never really a threat to them)
I'm convinced that this was a planned clown operation after looking at the Wiki page. Someone or some entity was inciting that protest back then (just like they do now). It was a Deep State op by whoever was profiting from the war to suppress opposition to it. The mayor and governor duly obeyed their orders to call in the NG to set an example.
I didn't read the entire wiki page, but it didn't take long to see the DS comms in the numbers in the beginning paragraphs. 1970 =17, 13s, 16s, and 3s, etc.
Suppress opposition by having protestors killed? It seems that whatever entity was involved, they were trying to build opposition to the war. In the case of Kent State, it would seem that such a shooting would INCREASE opposition to the war, which would be contrary to deep state interests, but what the Soviet Union wanted.
I wouldn't find that hard to believe. What else isn't hard to believe is there is a lot of deception, fakery, false flags, treason, infiltration, clandestine ops, secret deals made, and misleading reporting that the public never knows about. The narrative of an event seems to be settled on by the media and history books for public consumption.
Scary! both BH and WH can use this. IMHO When we hear "My Fellow Americans The Storm Is Upon Us" It will be a call to arms!
Yeah Q is Military, but the BH has control of a lot of our military too! Holding the line is fine until its your door they are kicking in. Just be ready for whatever happens...
Biden, or whoever the controlled actor is playing Biden, has threatened to use our own military to attack us. This is one example below. Pretty sure that there were others setting the narrative.
“How many have heard this phrase, the blood of liberty washes those… gimme a break,” President Biden said. “No, I mean it. Seriously. And by the way, if they want to think they want to take on government if we get out of line, which they’re talking again about, guess what, they need F-15s. They don’t need a rifle.”
Biden's a puppet acting under the direction of Patriots.
Trump is Commander in Chief under CoG and devolution.
This statement by Biden and DoD directive 5240.01 (see below) is the perfect cover to move military assets around to defeat the rats planned civil unrest on November 5th in the hopes of stopping the election.
“As the U.S. prepares for one of the most controversial and closely watched elections in its history, a concerning update to DoD Directive 5240.01 has quietly been put into effect. Reissued on September 27, 2024, this directive governs the Department of Defense's (DoD) intelligence activities and now includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances when assisting civilian law enforcement. While the directive forbids assassination, it opens the door to lethal interventions under "national security" conditions….
The reissuance of DoD Directive 5240.01 repealed previous versions, including the 1982 DoD 5240.1-R. While the update might seem routine, the changes regarding the use of lethal force in domestic operations are significant.
In the 2016 version, the directive primarily focused on intelligence collection and ensuring civil liberties protections for U.S. persons. It emphasized strict oversight and the need for authorization before collecting U.S. person information.
However, the 2024 version expands the military's role, particularly in assisting civil law enforcement, and authorizes lethal force under specific conditions, raising questions about its use during potential civil unrest surrounding the election.”
This goes hand in hand with Trump asking us to vote in person early. Hes looking to mitigate any civilian casualties or interference.
Edit: Thinking a little further on it I think unleashing the army of criminals and professional revolutionaries they have so meticulously collected over the last 8 years is a forgone conclusion and signifies their "hail mary" shot. They are fucked and know it. You can see it in the eyes of libtard hosts, can hear it in their voices and read about it in their dark musings over their fate with the latest being Milley. They cant let Trump win, they know they cant cheat enough this time so they will do everything they can to cancel the election and declare martial law.
This op may include internet blackout to add to the chaos.
Who will be president when an uprising happens. We didn't do it. Bit tje left claims they will. In times of armed insurrection who you going to call? The police? I just saw how ragged they go ran just securing gas stations so people could safely wait in line and pump. Here in florida we had a fu. Pulled amd a stabbing st the pumps. For 4 days their were police at every station that had fuel.
Kent state, Chicago dnc convention, plenty of other examples. Its usually the national guardsman but that may no be enough this time.
If Antifa is burning down a city, you try bull horns ordering them to stop, then water cannons, then rubber bullets and tear gas, then what, “pretty please”?
Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation
in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use
of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also
includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation
between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted
based on the specifics of the requested support.
Even if this is the case,reading the other document that you are referring to states in the section on the use of deadly force:
"Deadly force may only be used when reasonable, including, but not limited to, under the following circumstances:
(f) Performing an arrest or apprehension, or preventing escape. Authorized DoD
personnel may use deadly force to arrest, apprehend, or prevent the unlawful escape of a fleeing
subject if there is probable cause to believe:
The subject has committed an offense involving the infliction or threatened
infliction of serious physical injury or death; and
The escape of the subject would pose an actual or imminent threat of death or
serious bodily harm to DoD personnel or others in the vicinity."
This is stated in 3.4 (USE OF FORCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. ). e 4 (f) (pages 17 & 18)
My interpretation of this combined with the new Directive is that the DoD may use deadly force if they perceive you to be a threat and fleeing the scene. (To me this will be used as the excuse to start shooting us when we have the election stolen from us a second time and we go to protest. There will be a false flag and the Commies will authorize the DoD to take us out.
I can see that you're right about the authorization, but you must also take into consideration that the current Administration is full of Traitors. Llyod Austin is one of them. Do you really think he would hesitate to authorize deadly force against us Patriots?
If authorized by the DoD they will shoot you, and they will use the excuse of political violence to engage you with deadly force while teamed with normal cops/sheriffs.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your levels of ' deadly force?' My interpretation is they are referring to the Military, National Guard etcetera.
There's a big difference to being engaged by Cops, Sheriffs, etcetera vs trained military men armed with a much more deadly arsenal and set of skills.
This would be the reason I think it's a "big deal" when they authorize deadly force to our Military against Us while 'assisting' L.E.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that "it doesn't matter because they are already doing it." From my understanding this new Directive expands upon the rules authorizing force against a civilian, or groups of civilians at the behest of the DoD. Normally this would be foreign combatants, terrorists, etcetera.
This corrupt administration and our compromised Congress have been conducting concocted schemes similar to this for a long time. Stacking bills that don't do anything initially, but then they interconnect to other bills and suddenly the combination of these new rules screws the people. This just seems to be another instance of the same, yet much more alarming considering the political climate and our shared enemies. (The Cabal/Deep State)
Directive to kill the 21 million Soros invaders when they chimp out? 🤔
Antifa
It works both ways. Crazy, traitorous Americans can be a target.
A.k.a if it's them they can use it to kill us
Look around. Does it seem like [they] are in control?
Heard a discussion on this over the weekend (DPH).
“authorized to kill Americans on US soil … I think it’s very, very dangerous.”
Apparently, this is not the case. That authority was always there. Are you going to mobilize the military into extreme emergency situations (i.e. insurrection) and NOT give them authority to use what and who they are?
The Military has ALWAYS been authorized to use lethal force when necessary. That's the entire reason for the whole Posse Comitatus Act in the first place. As far as I understand.
u/#q34
Last sentence.
Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury – certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations (at home and abroad).
As long as it isn't against true American people like a Pol Pot or Bolshevik situation.
maybe that's why the mil assets were held up from going in to NC for so long, they were waiting on their title X orders for almost a week. that creates a backlash that makes it easier to activate them CONUS. for WH or BH.
CONUS = continental United States?
yup, got it in one.
I guess the onus was on Dashy to understgand "CONUS". Dashy came through with flying colors.
fren, you're ridiculous. 😂
In this case, proudly so. And thank you for noticing. :D
Oath covers foreign AND domestic...
The idea is FAFO - what I think scares most is the fact that the government isn't so good to obeying laws and having integrity in any capacity... so take someone who doesn't ever FA - they certainly don't want or deserve to FO.
Only the U.S. Congress can grant that authority. DoD is just getting their paperwork in order in the event they get Congressional Authority. They do this every so often to keep the paperwork up to date.
u/#happening
u/#pepenuke
The National Guard was called in by the Governor of Ohio resulting in the killing of 4 students and the injuring of 9 others at Kent State University on May 5th, 1970 during anti-war protests. These protests were mild compared to what I fear will come with antifa being activated.
As I understand it, National Guard exists because regular military was not allowed to act domestically and, even with that, the NG has limited ability to take action with citizens which is why they coordinate with local law enforcement for arrests and other more "interactive" public activities
There is pretty good evidence that Soviets were behind the scenes at Kent State (and other universities at the time), stirring up the anti-war protests, leading to the shootings (but it was some too-scared National Guardsmen ultimately at fault; the crowd was never really a threat to them)
You mean the deep state were there. Probably our own people in the fbi doing it.
I'm convinced that this was a planned clown operation after looking at the Wiki page. Someone or some entity was inciting that protest back then (just like they do now). It was a Deep State op by whoever was profiting from the war to suppress opposition to it. The mayor and governor duly obeyed their orders to call in the NG to set an example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
I didn't read the entire wiki page, but it didn't take long to see the DS comms in the numbers in the beginning paragraphs. 1970 =17, 13s, 16s, and 3s, etc.
Suppress opposition by having protestors killed? It seems that whatever entity was involved, they were trying to build opposition to the war. In the case of Kent State, it would seem that such a shooting would INCREASE opposition to the war, which would be contrary to deep state interests, but what the Soviet Union wanted.
I wouldn't find that hard to believe. What else isn't hard to believe is there is a lot of deception, fakery, false flags, treason, infiltration, clandestine ops, secret deals made, and misleading reporting that the public never knows about. The narrative of an event seems to be settled on by the media and history books for public consumption.
Scary! both BH and WH can use this. IMHO When we hear "My Fellow Americans The Storm Is Upon Us" It will be a call to arms!
Yeah Q is Military, but the BH has control of a lot of our military too! Holding the line is fine until its your door they are kicking in. Just be ready for whatever happens...
Biden, or whoever the controlled actor is playing Biden, has threatened to use our own military to attack us. This is one example below. Pretty sure that there were others setting the narrative.
“How many have heard this phrase, the blood of liberty washes those… gimme a break,” President Biden said. “No, I mean it. Seriously. And by the way, if they want to think they want to take on government if we get out of line, which they’re talking again about, guess what, they need F-15s. They don’t need a rifle.”
The document specifically refers to “civilians”, NOT (US) CITIZENS…
This can go both ways and see as how we are nearing the precipice I'll wait and see.
I have a different take informed by my knowledge of Q. I posted it in this thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/199OB5mTeW/-biden-warned-iran-that-killing-/
and will just repost verbatim.
Biden's a puppet acting under the direction of Patriots.
Trump is Commander in Chief under CoG and devolution.
This statement by Biden and DoD directive 5240.01 (see below) is the perfect cover to move military assets around to defeat the rats planned civil unrest on November 5th in the hopes of stopping the election.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-10-12/us-military-now-authorized-kill-americans-us-soil-new-dod-directive-drops
This goes hand in hand with Trump asking us to vote in person early. Hes looking to mitigate any civilian casualties or interference.
Edit: Thinking a little further on it I think unleashing the army of criminals and professional revolutionaries they have so meticulously collected over the last 8 years is a forgone conclusion and signifies their "hail mary" shot. They are fucked and know it. You can see it in the eyes of libtard hosts, can hear it in their voices and read about it in their dark musings over their fate with the latest being Milley. They cant let Trump win, they know they cant cheat enough this time so they will do everything they can to cancel the election and declare martial law.
This op may include internet blackout to add to the chaos.
This may be what the precipice looks like.
Why would the democrats do this if it looks like they will lose election? :p
Who will be president when an uprising happens. We didn't do it. Bit tje left claims they will. In times of armed insurrection who you going to call? The police? I just saw how ragged they go ran just securing gas stations so people could safely wait in line and pump. Here in florida we had a fu. Pulled amd a stabbing st the pumps. For 4 days their were police at every station that had fuel.
Kent state, Chicago dnc convention, plenty of other examples. Its usually the national guardsman but that may no be enough this time.
If Antifa is burning down a city, you try bull horns ordering them to stop, then water cannons, then rubber bullets and tear gas, then what, “pretty please”?
True to form here is their projection within a day: https://twitter.com/KamalaHQ/status/1845999620402397636
Page 13: 3.3 a c:
Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation
between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support.
👍 "Can we be friends?!" 😉🤣❤️
Even if this is the case,reading the other document that you are referring to states in the section on the use of deadly force: "Deadly force may only be used when reasonable, including, but not limited to, under the following circumstances: (f) Performing an arrest or apprehension, or preventing escape. Authorized DoD personnel may use deadly force to arrest, apprehend, or prevent the unlawful escape of a fleeing subject if there is probable cause to believe:
This is stated in 3.4 (USE OF FORCE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. ). e 4 (f) (pages 17 & 18)
My interpretation of this combined with the new Directive is that the DoD may use deadly force if they perceive you to be a threat and fleeing the scene. (To me this will be used as the excuse to start shooting us when we have the election stolen from us a second time and we go to protest. There will be a false flag and the Commies will authorize the DoD to take us out.
I can see that you're right about the authorization, but you must also take into consideration that the current Administration is full of Traitors. Llyod Austin is one of them. Do you really think he would hesitate to authorize deadly force against us Patriots?
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/521056p.PDF?ver=PIvIb3eht0obgolnD0UCEw%3d%3d
(Sorry about the late reply I was at work)
If authorized by the DoD they will shoot you, and they will use the excuse of political violence to engage you with deadly force while teamed with normal cops/sheriffs.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your levels of ' deadly force?' My interpretation is they are referring to the Military, National Guard etcetera.
There's a big difference to being engaged by Cops, Sheriffs, etcetera vs trained military men armed with a much more deadly arsenal and set of skills.
This would be the reason I think it's a "big deal" when they authorize deadly force to our Military against Us while 'assisting' L.E.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that "it doesn't matter because they are already doing it." From my understanding this new Directive expands upon the rules authorizing force against a civilian, or groups of civilians at the behest of the DoD. Normally this would be foreign combatants, terrorists, etcetera.
This corrupt administration and our compromised Congress have been conducting concocted schemes similar to this for a long time. Stacking bills that don't do anything initially, but then they interconnect to other bills and suddenly the combination of these new rules screws the people. This just seems to be another instance of the same, yet much more alarming considering the political climate and our shared enemies. (The Cabal/Deep State)
TrumpYMCA, You must have just scanned through and missed a page. 😒. Try reading slow and carefully.
Page 13, 3.3! Really or are you just Handshake account Shillin? I really hope you’re not this dense.
“Reading the actual document just now. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA%3d%3d And there's no such authorization.”
Your original statement. Means you’re saying it doesn’t exist. Yes you clarified, but long after we were already checking you.
But yes you did clarify. So, your are not Shillin. Prior statement without current clarification was Shilly.
All good.
Thank you