1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're keeping them on life support if you're paying for cable just for sports or some other nonsense.

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can make changes to the contract and send it back. If they don't notice you can expose them if you changed the NDA and keep the money.

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can be drafted and die in a war for Israel or Ukraine at 18 but you can't buy a rifle that shoots 22 long rifles at 18.

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah they're a boomer, they ain't paying through a website. Which is the site that comes up when I search for the Incorporation. I just can't confirm the Topeka address.

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +4 / -1

"If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that, otherwise I'm speaking."

They "are" saying that.

0
Qlueless 0 points ago +1 / -1

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

The PDF can still be found on the White House archives.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Keep in mind the PDF is utter garbage and not what you use to prove the BC is fake. You cannot, period. It has been processed by software that boosted contrast on recognized characters and dropped the white background. And yes PDF's can have "layers" of information. It's forensically impossible to determine its validity.

What you need at the very least is an image that hasn't been processed. Oh look, here it is:

https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/384645179e13c228635f2ebd43ee4d43/0x0.jpg

It's an scan of a Microfilm slide. In order to know if the document is fake you would need access to the microfilm and compare all other photographs of birth certificates in that period. You do not have that access. You never will have that access. Even if you did have access you will never prove your case to the general public let alone in a court. Obama's 8 years of damage will not be reversed rehashing his BC.

And here is what I can slap together using free software. I have to do everything manually, the government has to do millions of documents so yes they're automating processes.

https://files.catbox.moe/uljspd.pdf

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

2
Qlueless 2 points ago +2 / -0

It says no change in rate, not that it isn't warming.

(Also that does not imply humans as the cause.)

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump, doing the jobs Kamala would never do.

2
Qlueless 2 points ago +2 / -0

Double edge sword.

Tells them how much they need to cheat.

Prevents them from casting your vote for you before you get to the polls.

1
Qlueless 1 point ago +2 / -1

The scanned image will render a perfectly filled in box making it impossible to know if a human actually filled it in.

-1
Qlueless -1 points ago +1 / -2

As stated in the video, go outside the bounding box.

Also I would write in a candidate in an inconsequential race. It can be something unique or a candidate listed above.

If ballot images are released it will help prove your ballot was scanned and not scanned more than once.

3
Qlueless 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I already learned that yesterday. It doesn't make him more credible.

4
Qlueless 4 points ago +5 / -1

https://geneho.com/editor-in-chief/

I'm not particularly impressed with his photography. You'd think he wouldn't have so much noise in his self portrait.

also this was posted before

https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKe7Sxwi/q-clock-ends-529-and-check-out-t/c/

6
Qlueless 6 points ago +7 / -1

George ceased to be in 2001. There is no magazine being printed. There is only cheesy merchandise for purchase on a website that couldn't purchase george.com.

edit: look at that quality construction with a superimposed george logo. 🙄

https://georgemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/5873564458673928650_2048.jpeg

view more: Next ›