2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

I totally get why the Dems constantly use the term “democracy” (as in claiming Trump “is a threat to democracy”), but it REALLY irks me when OUR side uses that term - even the amazing Stephen Miller beats that “democracy” drum frequently. Wish that our side would STOP using the enemy’s terminology.

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry if this seems like a stupid question, but why do you think these drug traffickers aren't just using airplanes to move their drugs around instead of just using boats/subs? Planes getting shot out of the sky would draw a lot more public outcry/scrutiny than blowing up boats out on the open sea, so I'd think the drug traffickers would feel better shielded by flying their drugs around instead of by boat. Whatchu think?

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

That camera angle does kinda have a 'pedestal sitting' vantage point, so I guess that's one positive aspect of that picture.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds about right. ;-)

7
RedPillQ17 7 points ago +7 / -0

That was my first reaction to this picture too. WTH with that insanely unflattering angle?? No professional photographer would EVER take a picture of their subject from that type of angle unless the sole purpose was to make it the person look as bad as possible. Glad POTUS is calling out this nasty ploy by Time Magazine. He deserves a MUCH more flattering photo for such a momentous occasion as ending Middle East wars.

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s with all the smiling she’s doing in her post-assassination appearances? It’s kinda unnerving to think this woman just lost her husband - the love of her life and father to her 2 young children - and she’s out there doing P.R. activities starting a couple days later. How is she sitting there looking glamourous and smiling like that? This seems super odd to me.

4
RedPillQ17 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was my thinking too. Why on earth would they broadcast this big military meeting beforehand? It’s not like the media would be allowed in during classified military briefings or anything.

Anyone know if a Deep State military person possibly leaked Hegseth’s memo announcing the meeting or did Hegseth post it publicly himself (I don’t know which)? I can’t access X to do a search without an acct.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s so many things that don’t make sense and so much contradictory info coming out. It doesn’t even make sense to me why some surgeon would even be operating on Charlie after he arrived at the hospital when he was already deceased before they wheeled him into the hospital. The way he was gushing blood, it seems likely that he was already dead before they even got him into the car.

I was also shocked by how fast his body was released and flown back to AZ. It’s all so bizarre - you’d think the autopsy would have been the focal point of the entire case. They must recover the bullet (if it somehow didn’t go straight through his body) and do ballistics to match the bullet to the alleged murder weapon.

We haven’t even seen anything to link the rifle from the woods to the bullet itself, much less that this Tyler guy was actually the person on the roof or that the person the roof was even the sniper (the video the FBI released starts after he’s already running away).

And I still haven’t seen a rifle being carried by Tyler in the stairwell pics (why not a video?) or the running across and jumping off the roof or walking around that neighborhood. Not buying any of it.

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good insights - thank you. It suuuuuuuuuuuuuper looks like a staged photo to me too - just even at first glance. I'm leaning towards whoever got shot were cartel peeps who needed to be 'silenced' (per some cartel leader or something). And they're pulling out their same ole tired 'write such-and-such phrase on the bullet casings to throw law enforcement off our scent' playbook. What's so sad is that ALWAYS seems to work! :-(

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whoever stopped the UN escalator the second DJT and Melania walked onto it should be charged with creating a risk to POTUS and FLOTUS. Not only could they have stumbled/fallen and gotten hurt, but a bad guy could have tried some kind of attack while they were on the ground or distracted there. This better be investigated by GOOD people at Secret Service, IMO.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what it looked like to me too - bullets written on with a Sharpie (LOL). I guess they word it like "carved messages into the bullets" to make it sound more diabolical. It's all so predictable and tired. So now I guess we're just waiting for this guy's made-up "manifesto" to be discovered so it will tie everything up in a neat little package with a bow on top.

I can't figure out from the photos where the sniper's alleged self-inflicted fatal gunshot wound was supposed to be on his body. A rifle is sticking into the side of his stomach on the rooftop pic, but there's no blood on that area of his clothes. His left sleeve is supposedly covered in blood, but where was he supposed to have been shot? I doubt he shot himself in the arm. Was it his head maybe?

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

I still don't get why didn't POTUS pick Miller as his VP instead of Vance. Miller is who I wanted for VP. And I also think it should be Miller to 'carry the MAGA torch' after Trump leaves office - NOT Vance. Just my opinion. :-)

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are soooooo uni-brain, sister! I vividly remember Kash's FBI Director acceptance speech and I'm still flabbergasted about it to this day. The whole "leave the FBI alone" and "let good cops be cops" (which he has pushed MANY times since then too). Um, WTF?? How about SHUT IT ALL THE FUCK DOWN instead??

I'm like, "WHAT 'good cops' in the (corrupt-as-fuck) FBI are you referring to exactly?!?" IMO, the majority of those people are just brown shirts, assassins for hire, false flaggers, framers, and cover-uppers. IMO, the LAST thing they do is actually solve crimes - probably because most of the big cases would end up implicating themselves if someone honest in the FBI were doing the investigating.

Even his pre-FBI Director-appointment how he said he'd "close the Hoover building on day one & turn it into a museum" morphed into moving the FBI into a better building instead. And let's not forget his pledge to "release all the Epstein files on day one" too - what a fiasco that's become.

And to your point about Kash blabbering on and on about all these perps being arrested and stats about this and that, it's funny you mention that b/c Mandy at Bombard's Body Language did an analysis of POTUS standing behind Kash at one of his briefings where Kash was going on and on about a bunch of numbers like that, and POTUS looked disgusted with Kash - clear as day.

It may have been Kash was claiming arrest #s as coming from the FBI that were actually done by ICE or Border Patrol (just a possibility) or maybe they were just all made up - I dunno. But POTUS did NOT look pleased listening to Kash's big arrest claim stats. Here's that video in case you wanna check it out (it came out about a month ago): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNWQmWrCiJo (12 minutes long)

Here's another body language analysis of Kash that Mandy did reviewing his interview at a Senate hearing with Sen. John Kennedy from 4 months ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvY7A74SmTU

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know the exact part of Kash's statement that you're referring to here and my jaw was on the floor when I heard him pull a Kamala with that too. Seems like Kash has been taking 'word salad lessons' from Bondi actually. Bondi's numerous public statement gaffes on the Epstein sitch have eclipsed Kamala's usual garden variety word salad, IMO.

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sounds like this was just a construction site where they’re building a Hyundai car plant - not illegals working “at a Hyundai plant.” They weren’t working at a Hyundai plant per se because it hasn’t even been built yet.

I’d bet the whole construction project was outsourced to a construction company, who would actually be the ones responsible for hiring all these illegal workers.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your guess is as good as mine. I am absolutely perplexed by this - and quite concerned. :-( This make zero sense to me - for ANY possible reason.

How about we not just get illegals the hell out of our country, we also get foreigners out of our MILITARY?!?!?

6
RedPillQ17 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’d think a high-profile position such as the head of Trump’s Golden Dome project would be personally approved by Hegseth and Chairman of Joint Chiefs, if not even Trump himself. This is very troubling. :-(

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

So disturbing! We can add AA and Visa to the “foreigners first” list too. AA was even shielding CHINESE nationals who were employees (a.k.a. spies) at their corporate HQ who had overstayed their visa by a YEAR and they somehow kept them from getting deported back in Trump’s first term. I saw it first hand. Disgusting!

4
RedPillQ17 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t understand why this would be specific to “IT companies” though - every medium to large corp. has IT departments and the majority of every one I’ve worked at is full of H1-B Indians and other foreigners. And a white female American in an IT department (or Product Manager role) at any company in America is damn near impossible to find.

IMO, Indians have a stranglehold on IT departments of American companies. Once the Indians get in there, they ONLY hire other Indians - it’s a total shut-out. I’ve seen this first-hand for decades and it disgusts me seeing these foreigners taking all these good-paying jobs away from Americans.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›