Yes! But what's sad is the argument against the conclusion that it's the vaxxes causing the autism in children. It goes something like this: "Well years ago there just wasn't the awareness of autism....and we have better ways/means to diagnose children who might have autism".
OK so let's go back a mere 20 years. Haven't we been able to diagnose autism during the last 20 years? Yes we have. So what have we seen in the last 20 years in regards to autism? The rate of autism has gone up right! Now look at the number of additional "vaccines" that have been added to the childhood vaccination schedule. Seems like there's a clear correlation between the # of vaccines recommended and the autism rate.
Yes there was autism in 1952 when I was born. The question is at what %%? It appeared extremely RARE in my day! Now it's a true epidemic. The %% of children w/autism has definitely been increasing. Just go back 20 years - wasn't the detection good during that period of time?
I believe the main thing driving the autism rate is the childhood vaccine schedule. Again I got 2 vaxxes as a child. How many are "recommended" today? Over 70?!
The come back is always something like this: "well we have better ways of diagnosing autism now as compared to earlier years".
Well again - growing up I can't remember one child in my school (or outside of school) who had autism. I was born in 1952.
Cut the follow of $$ to these groups and they will go away.