Tue, 11 Jan 2005 / AP (Scrubbed off the Internet, but not entirely)
I wonder if the Plandemic was so vast in size that, like a train, you could slam the brakes, but it's not going to stop for awhile. It's just so heavy.
So, how would you ever stop something with that much "weight" invested into it?
You wouldn't... but maybe you'd attach a bumper to the front of the train. (Not the greatest example but work with me here!)
What if the dangerous elements of the Plandemic were swapped out with placebos? What if so many of the people who were in on it went ahead with it thinking that it was going ahead as planned (without knowing to what degree the operation had already been dismantled by white hats?)
This might explain the weirdness at the very beginning (November 19) with the videos of people in Wuhan China collapsing in the street. What if whatever was "supposed" to come to the world WAS that deadly, and China simply had its people play possum in order to not look like the guilty party who let it loose on the world?
Again, if something as big as the Plandemic is going to be dismantled, how in the world would you, as a top ranking black hat, communicate that to all your underlings? ...you wouldn't, especially if you were under arrest and ordered to proceed as normal so as to create the appearance of the Plandemic going on as scheduled, so as to throw a wide net over all the peons doing their part on the ground.
Just spitballing here, but I think it was a combination of being allowed to happen, plus that such a vast conspiracy wouldn't be so easy to stop, like brakes on a train.
THIS. I like too how he just gets his commercials over and done with, whereas a lot of YouTubers from all industries will read their commercials live and/or take time to do them. With X22, I know how to skip the commercial in the beginning, and when the second comes around, I just listen to it because it's almost easier to listen than to skip at that point.
Hillary did a public Zoom call 2 days ago. I wonder if she dropped any comms?
Please do not ask further questions about this, as doing so may result in your account being banned by the admins.
Wow!
Unless it was never actually known, it all gets blamed on trump in the end.
I think it'll never actually be known.
Just like the letters at GHWB's funeral, certain things are just not going to be presented on the public stage of the news media, but as Q said, "the choice to know will be yours."
Why wouldn't they come right out and talk about some of these things? To prevent mass civil unrest would be my guess. Maybe they have so much evidence of crimes committed by all the swamp monsters that the swamp monsters are happily playing their role on the public stage in exchange for leniency. Whether they deserve any is for a different conversation, but again, imagine the shock if everyone was just suddenly arrested. Thus they play a role.
Q had also said that there'd be instances where sexual assault allegations would be the public cover for real bad swamp monsters to step down suddenly. Cuomo is perhaps an exception, but remember Al Franken? Matt Lauer was being reported as having a "lock the door" rape button in his office.
They're letting little pieces of truth out at a time, but again, as Q said, when it comes to the public stage, a lot would probably never be said out loud, at least officially.
Who cares about the flight suits? As long as it doesn't stop the Military from shooting down enemy planes, what s the problem here?
The very existence of a "maternity flight suit" is rock solid evidence that people have gone so far down the lefty diversity rabbit hole that they aren't thinking logically any more.
We're expected to think, "wow, women in the military, so amazing," when really, we should be saying "Well, yeah, but surely you can find someone to fly that jet fighter who isn't expecting?" The notion of active duty pregnant women is bad enough, but flying JET FIGHTERS?!
That's the problem.
Here's an idea that will save you a lot of stress.
If you don't police what's low effort and/or high effort, and leave it up to the hive mind, the hive mind will decide for you.
Why must you stress yourself to referee a sea of postings?
My guess is that this is exactly what the Deep State was counting on.
Also, I guess this is why Q was pushing the "you are sheep to them" thing so hard. So long as you WANT to be part of the herd, you'll justify ANYTHING to stick with the herd.
This is why individualism and self-determination are so important. It's not "hey, I'm me man, I'm so unique," but it's that if you are RELIANT on the positive validation on others, then you need it like a junkie needs his fix.
Kek, really gives perspective as to how silly this whole situation is.
Media plays it up like it's the scariest thing but can never provide any real proof of it, so it's like this unspoken thing that's just supposed to be horrible because it's just so horrible (for some reason). It's like a never-ending circle, kind of like when the MSM would just go in loops sourcing each other.
Bingo!
These people are indeed very stupid!
Psst, Biden was inaugurated January 20, not Feb 20!
I wonder how long he practiced that!
Thinking in terms of good movies and good actors...
Wouldn't it be easier to sink a corrupt organization if your guy publicly behaved in a corrupt manner?
Maybe Wray is playing his part to perfection.
We’re still waiting for a report from a man named Durham
No one ever said there'd be a "Durham report." He's a prosecutor, not an inspector general.
with the left in firm control until then
I hate to be cliche, but they don't even look like they feel in charge.
Or you used FaceApp and are trying to spin us a red herring.
Nice try.
Trump basically pulled a Q, giving us a segment that didn't make sense at the time but would make sense later.
"You won't see me again for awhile"... in August?
This is like a Q proof all in itself, not that we need them anymore.
Newsweek: "Joe Biden, Playing as Luigi, Wins in Mario Kart Race Against Granddaughter at Camp David"
I get that they're trying to be cute and down-to-earth, but the specific mention of which character Biden was playing seems completely unnecessary to mention, unless they've got some nerds who felt like pointing it out just to point it out.
Interesting how Luigi is Mario's FAR less prominent half...
I also love how it's like, if you're going to hit me with an ad then just do it and get it over with. The abrupt switch makes it funny, and then I know that it'll only be 10-20 seconds again and we'll be right back to it.
He who controls the "experts" control the world.
As social media speeds up, and the ability of the bad guys to explain their silly antics stays at a fixed molasses speed, I think I've noticed something interesting.
What if the bad guys had a little bit of a script of their own, and THIS is why AOC was going on about how "we almost all died?" Because they really DID have something major planned? But here's the thing... if they had written their script in advance TO REACH A CERTAIN GOAL, they'd have to STICK to their script AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. So the bad guys just run with "we almost all died" narrative BECAUSE THEY NEEDED IT TO BE AS BAD AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THEIR FUTURE CRACKDOWNS!
So basically, the 24/7 social media has outpaced the ability of the DS to keep up, adapt their narrative to the new changes, and get everyone on the same exact wavelength. Because with a lot of planning comes a LOT of necessary coordination (see all the headlines being in sync, the "dark" Trump speeches and whatnot.)
I'm just spitballing so that might have been disorganized so here's a TLDR:
TLDR: What if we've reached the point where DS can't coordinate their moves quick enough to keep a coherent narrative, and AOC saying "we almost all literally died" was literally them halfway caught between sticking to their previous script and halfway them trying to ad lib due to new circumstances, hence the absolute silliness of the MSM narrative?
Q team knows what it means right away. Readers don't know until later. Strategy. Let your enemies think you mean Thing A, when you really meant Thing B.
If they decide "oh come on strategy isn't a thing, there's no way they can chart things out ahead of time," then, well, that's on them. Doesn't change reality.
I can pick a letter right now, and say in a year what letter I picked. Doesn't mean I didn't have a letter picked from the start.
Hm, interesting. What makes you say that it is probably incorrect?