Interesting But methinks it is wishful thinking giver the Source. (Not using intelligence, or even reading the Russian media. Just sucking the storyout of their thumb)
This is what the Russian media is reporting:
‘Ukrainian connection’ possible in Trump shooting – opposition leader https://www.rt.com/news/601171-ukraine-trace-trump-shooting/
The day before the assassination attempt on you, Mr. President, the head of Ukrainian military intelligence stated that the Ukrainian authorities had attempted to assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin, and a few days earlier, the head of the Office of the President of Ukraine promised to destroy Ukrainians who advocate peace with Russia,” Medvedchuk told Trump.
The Republican presidential nominee (Trump) has repeatedly said he would negotiate a swift end to the Ukraine conflict. Doing so, however, would mean “the loss of power by the Nazi regime of Zelensky and his American curators from the Biden administration,” Medvedchuk also noted.
And here's an anon reporting on Ukie Telegram channels:
Apparently, some AFU units are saying that the sniper who shot Trump was not good enough and theyre "disappointed". But, they "get him before he becomes president".
Yes, I am looking at this with popcorn at the ready. Kamala is the duly appointed Veep. So the path of least resistance if Joe dies, or becomes "too ill" (hard to do), or is impeached .
However. Kamala is fundamentally a DEI-hire who was too weak to challenge the doddering Joe. This eliminates the entire 'veep takes over' theory. And I think she knows it - hence the hysterical attempt to garner rapport with the audiences she talks to, and the nasal sight (looking down her nose) along with her nasal voice (ya know) - for tete-a-tetes with softballing journalists. She knows she cannot fake it, and she is transparent.
So the latter is the counter argument to PResident HArris. On balance, I think they will put Biden in cotton wool at this point (He is isolating because Bird Flu), and preserve the narrative that everyone is going to 'calm down' now. i think they'll try lockdowns again
Oh, damnation.
What happens if FJB dies suddenly, because of IDK, old age? Covid? A sudden deterioation? THe ConSpiRacy Theories would be "He's been poisoned". and blame it on a Trump supporter, anyway. And Follow-up as from point #3.
My point is: We are literally entering the Storm.
Anyway, this narrative does not really make sense.
Specific reason: Iranians want revenge for Suleimani's assassination? Otherwise more genreal reason: Iranians wants to kill a Presidential candidate, because they prefer Democrats?
IDK it seems fishy. Who wants Iran to go down, really, as in why is Iran an enemy of USA? Something, something iranians threw the physical USA Embassy out of their country (1979) - and with good reason, in terms of corruption and theft, TBH, because there were all sorts of mysterious black ops going on from that den. Sooo, we are supposed to hate them now? ... and have USA been sanctioning them ever since - which has led to all sorts of deprivation and continued Black Markets etc.
Oh yeah, sanctions are financial terrorism - and tend to backfire, BTW. But - this narrative does not make sense. IF the hatred is deep-seated and old, why would they want to kill the most popular president who says things like: "I want the dying to stop" - Or "let's just do business". Even if some will blame Trump for Suleimani's death - who is arguably the most brilliant military strategist this century - in terms of tunnelling a drone warfare. So is it THAT specific reason?
This latter narrative does not make sense either: Suleimani is now a martyr Inch Allah. (InB4: I am a Christian, but have lived 'over there'). My point is, not making fun, but the last statement is one of fatalism - and a recognition of the value of martyrs, and Suleimani's historic philosphy and military strategy are now an example to follow. So I don't think that an Iranian was trying to stir the geo-political pot, to influence an American election. I just don't.
What is a simpler explanation?
Plus, the ballistics test shows the bullet was from a much longer range (over 400 yards away). Link is live at the moment so you'll have to scroll back to get the full story.
This means there was another shooter, and the guy on the roof was a patsie. there were multiple eyewitnesses say there was a second shooter - on the water tower.
What we are experiencing now is a Fog of War in the propaganda sphere. We are all in a grey zone, information-wise.
I hear your frustration, so my advice is to take a few deep breaths and then make some popcorn, because this is going to be a long haul. We have a job to do - that is filtering all the info that is coming out (The FBI will just make up a story, as they always do, so it is up to the digital soldiers). Lots of that emerging info is bogus - for example, I have seen pictures of a stationary fixed ladder in place, between the buildings. So this image doesn't jive with the 'man carrying a ladder' narrative (and some outlets are not talking about the ladder at all). Nor does the fixed ladder jive with the 'cop climbs on another cop's shoulders to get warded off by gunman and falling (why did he not use the ladder that was there? > Are the pictures of a fixed ladder doctored?). Plus there is all the 'look at the waamen fumbling and flapping narrative, too - to add to the dogpile.
And yes, Russians, Iranians, North Koreans, Chinese etc. will all be blamed automatically, now that the Right-Wing lunatic narrative has already been debunked by autists who found a donation to Biden (b...b...b...but it was only 15 dollars). It;s like a 'Flat Earth' or 'Hollow Moon' theory, or a '9-11 was done by shape-shifting' theory. That's the nature of a Fog of War, and deflection.
Just remember that JFK's assassination still has not been explained to the public. Trump told Judge Nap that the information was too horrible to reveal just yet. What was it that scared him?
Interesting.
picture of Trump and JFK Jr., (RFK's second cousin) just to decorate the thought:
from https://theankler.com/p/jfk-jr-david-pecker-donald-trump-george-magazine
I'm pretty sure, one's religion has nothing to do with how a marriage works in this country, especially when its between kids who have gone to college in the USA. It's just weird. Furthermore, how has the partner's alleged religion anything to do with a Veep appointment? I think it's against the First Amendment to even consider it. Also, the wives still have autonomy, and their own lives to tend to. So it's actually just rude.
Anyway, why do these shills even care by which set of rules the children are raised? It's insultng. AND I think Christianity is great, but Hindus, Sikhs and others like people from Nepal, are nothing but the sweetest and most religious people, who would never even deign to offend a Christian - rather they will welcome them into their homes. Do these Shills still believe the British Imperialist lies about Hindus? Those were told to the local populations in the West, just to justify that some in 19thC London (the biggest money-laundering shell-game around) could steal the entirety of India's fabled wealth? Yeah those DS types, including the 'Royals'.
Further to the poojeet memes glowies tend to post: Note that India was horribly impoverished throughout the 20thC because of the relentless theft, and they stopped the bleeding with Ghandi's passive resistance, The DS assassinated him, BTW. So all is not well when people start pointing fingers like that.
i spit in their general direction.
Oh I see, are you saying that the AJ precedent, which is awful, BTW, means Trump can sue news-outlets.
Or to argue the point: AJ's case needs to be overturned or they will cook their goose, re: Trump going after the treasured propaganda mills.
Interesting.
Nice, join-the-dots.
LOL