For the three-year olds in the audience, can you elaborate?

We have all the time in the world to rehash some stuff 'round here.

Main talking points:

1.Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician.

2. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners.

3. Biden will not abandon Ukraine. Biden will protect democracy, while Trump is Putin's puppet.

left-wing troll-farms to be sure.

This is where all the tax-payer money goes.

Reposted, becasue the pic didn't load porperly.

NZ Herald is one of the government-funded 'MSM' toilet-papers. They are reporting on a RNZ (Governmentfunded Radio) article that there was a lower-than-expected demand for the pins, so the program has been cut by the current penny-pinchers.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/after-spending-2m-on-pins-for-covid-19-workers-department-now-cutting-costs/2VVRRJ34QRH5XOB2VH5HVMPDEM/#:~:text=The%20previous%20government%20set%20aside,%2Dcutting%20pressure%2C%20documents%20show.

However, have a look at the image - A triangle, {oh really?} with a Crown embedded in it. [LOL- are they admitting to the plot to eradcate all humans from the planet, or at least an endorsement of WHO, via the Crown?]/

Tell us what else you see ..

An Oligarchy to be exact. Wealthy individuals [or huge corporations] buying congress, on both sides of the isle, to be sure, and piggies in congress, and senate, getting filthy rich.

They have fancy names for it, such as Public Private Partnership; or collaboration between government and private sector to achieve public outcomes.

AKA Fascism.

Hmmm.

Drumming up sympathy ain't gunna work. A wooden stake through the heart is the normal treatment for descendants of Vlad the Impaler.

NZ Herald is one of the government-funded 'MSM' toilet-papers. They are reporting on a RNZ (Governmentfunded Radio) article that there was a lowethan-expected demand for the pins, so the program has been cut by the current penny-pinchers.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/after-spending-2m-on-pins-for-covid-19-workers-department-now-cutting-costs/2VVRRJ34QRH5XOB2VH5HVMPDEM/#:~:text=The%20previous%20government%20set%20aside,%2Dcutting%20pressure%2C%20documents%20show.

However: have a look at the image: A triangle, {oh really?} with a Crown embedded in it. [LOL- are they admitting to the plot to eradcate all humans from the planet, or at least an endorsement of WHO, via the Crown?]/

Tell us what else you see ..

edit, the picture did not load. Here is the original image https://www.nzherald.co.nz/resizer/v2/HFS4ILCHVBBQLL4E75HRHGFDCI.jpg?auth=1b5fd097645ad38c6f9ef6da23d0207eb57fa250af98d75328954265446e3e1d&width=1440&height=900&quality=70&smart=true

Now why would they do that?

1. The Palestinians don't want a deportation port

2. Or, they don't want 'UN' troops coming in - who knows what trouble they bring - in any case they were escorted by the enemy, so fair game.

3. It's a False Flag. The article blames Palestinian Terrorists - not even HAMAS, as we have been relentlessly drilled with previously? [Narrative shift happening - prolly as they realize they will have to negotiate with HAMAS as a political force, eventually].

Later, the article doubles down on their new fuzzy terminology:

a terror group in the Gaza Strip

How wonderfully non-specific.

One gotta ask Cui Bono

OR archive the link.

KEK

Never mind the Ukrainians and the Palestinians.

OK everyone, time to download the vid, archive it, etc. So that we can get a look at all their traitorous face in perpitutitty.

This is according to the theory that anyone who advocates to stop the killing and to start negotiating is a traitor.

Hmmm. You conspiracy theorist, you.

Correlation does not equal causation, ya know.

/s

And they achieved their goal: MOAR homelessness.

What a nice picture. We can archive it, and find all their traitorous faces, for future use.

NOBODY has the RIGHT to abuse everyone else in society by degrading the area (city) into a complete shithole that everyone must deal with.

OK, so that is a very fuzzy statement. First of all society already deals with all sorts of public stuff, like sewerage, street-cleaners, dump-trucks, ambulances, public playgrounds etc. IF the garbage is not removed properly, then the street soon looks like a hell-hole. My point is that 'every else' is already actively dealing with a constantly degrading infrastructure. That is the nature of public management. The argument is: How is one to deal with it, going forward. You advocate for camps outside the city. I advocate for converting Office buildings, with some detail.

Do you mean that 'everyone else' is abused by 'their' presence? So, it is a fastidious cleansing sort of statement - to make the streets nice-;looking again. There is a clear distinction between 'those people' and 'everyone else'. Define it please. Bipolar generalizations tend to cause, for example, vulnerable young people down on their luck, being swept up in the clean-up, and that situation is ripe for abuse.

You blame the drug-takers etc. fine. I agree, those people are a special kind of victim of an international conspiracy to bring USA to its knees, a la a just retribution. There was a country that experienced such a revolution. Drugs, collapse and hunger and they are now quite happy, a hundred years later, except for perhaps some cold revenge.

So yes, those drug-addicts ( a percentage of 'those' people) can benefit from some sort of curfew/lockdown. Perhaps a de-tox program. But, I believe that sending them out in the desert is one thing - good on Arizona. Sending them out into upstate NY, or the hampshires, or Pennsylvanian ex-coalminer towns is maybe it bit of a harsher sentence. It's called snow in winter. So, that is why I am overthinking live-saving pods, etc.

And thanks for the opportunity to speak actively my fine fren.

Uniparty are hoping that they can have Ukraine collapse AFTER the election, cause then it will be Trump's fault. Also, Uniparty want to keep borders open, to juice the numbers, with weeny campaigners telling all the entrants to vote Biden and hand out phones with VOTE BIDEN emblazoned on them.

MAGA wants to stop the needless dying, whether it is on the front-lines, the Darien Gap - a steep jungle ravine and a monstous hole in the Roading network; or in Palestine.

I wish that it could be all done now. But I guess Trump is still waiting on announcing his solution to the ISreal question. [Save Israel for last, there is a good reason for this]

Palestinians are needlessly dying, and in a very public way, so it cannot be politically ignored, even in the short term. People who object to killing children, with million-dollar bombs and hunger sieges, are painted as ultra-left, not so much Republican. Furthermore, it does not appear that Trump is refusing to support Israel - which is what the ultra-lefties want.

However, there is a rift forming accross both Democrats and Republicans, between those who are pro-human and those who are antihuman. I don't know how it it will play out, but perhaps the issue is now: How is Trump going to spin Israel? (He did say 'Stop the Killing'). So how is he going to persuade the ISraelis to stop killing everything in sight? The Fascists are on a spree, and the general blood-lust (LOL Red Cow) is only making them angrier. Some of them (the loudest ones) really, really want to kill all Palestinians. Some of the more moderate ones want to 'export them to other countries'. None of them want to entertain a peaceful co-existance two-state solution that we have all heard about ad-nauseam [Cough: Oslo].

How about a ONE state solution? @Syrian_girl was talking about it. That would mean a peaceful transition to having elected Palestinian representatives seated in the Israeli (Palestinian - that was always the name pre-Balfour?) Central Government, and a legitimate budget spent, as opposed to a dark war one: also no more border-wall concentration camp sh*t.

OK, thanks for answering, because I enjoy a debate:

So, such a refugee/drying out rehabilitation camps have been done in the past. There are documented examples. So, to avoid certain pitfalls (which can easily turn to having Auswitzian ramifications):

1. The camps should be constructed in a regimental fashion for ease of services and traffic, etc. Sort of like a Roman camp. But, building those, sets off conspiracy theorist googlemappers and content-tourists, as documented in Australia, during the last few 'C' conpiracy years. Given that there have been no rumours of empty, but new tent-cities, 'just a comfy drive' away from said cities, I asked: where are the planners sending the street-people?

2. The tent/modular tiny-home camps should be comfortable and humane, with power/running water/ablution blocks/WIFI etc., so that people go there willingly, otherwise we will have social media of: homeless people being kidnapped from the streets by suited men and laden into buses. A wee bit brown-shirty. Refer to point one, to check on political willingness to invest in such a well-serviced and planned venture.

3. All those empty office-blocks with clap-board walls and bad ventilation, could be turned into living quarters, but not in the state they are in. No doubt there is a fair bit of squatting already in play. The issue is: The Office-block commercial property guys, have been kicking the sleepers out 'cos eww, and fire-hazards and dirty needles etc. But, the office-workers have all discovered their home-WIFI and are workng from home, so they are not going back to the city. Offices remain empty since lockdowns - so I guess this is what is being talked about now, because the retail-office commercial property guys are not making any money.

So to elaborate: if the building's bones i.e. the concrete slabs, are in good condition, one could start a modular village in the city. Instead of Camps 'out there' which are expensive, difficult to find land for, and not easy to hide. And guess what? there are lifts, electricity on each floor, toilets etc.

So, such a solution would mean individual/pair/family living pods that can be arranged on a concrete floor, with WIFI; charging points and serviced toilet block on each floor already there. Bonus.

Each floor (some demolition required) would need a Commercial grade kitchen and laundromat an installation for the city to consider funding - in collabrataion with the hurting retail/officespace guys. But I guess the public funding aspect can be compared with setting up a fully serviced camp 'out there'.

Such a venture would still be subject to fire-codes and ablution rules etc. Hence all that clap-board needs to go, and plumbing inspections etc.

But this might be something less politically challenging than trying to 'outsource' the 'problem'. And that's why I am bringing point 3 up.

There are downsides, of course.

Banning them from 'sleeping outside' is just moving them along. They do not have 'homes' to go to, except maybe a tent, if they are lucky. They need to sleep eventually, and they need to sleep somewhere. If they have no place to go, it will be on the street, preferably on a grate that breathes warm air from underground.

These KArens who sit on councils imagine that all people have homes to go to. Getting 'rid' of street sleepers, means what exactly? Bussing them to the countryside? To another city perhaps? They come to the cities because they can then use shops with the little money they have, and peripherally still take advantage of some amenitites. Or maybe they are in that city because that is where they lost their home,

What are u gunna do? Ban Sleeping? Get rid of corner shops and bottle stores?

And I am still wondering what happened to all those peeps who were magically moved, for the Chinese dignitaries to see clean streets.

I realize that many of them are drug addicts, but that is a symptom, not the problem.

Some of those Republicans are RINOs.

Republicans and Democrats are two cheeks on the same butt. There is also is a thing called the Uniparty. The problem is that the Uniparty, which includes the SoH, have managed to merge the two parties, so that they then reside in the general area between the butt-cheeks that one normally doesn't mention in polite society.

Washington’s hybrid war against Russia will turn into a humiliating fiasco, the Russian Foreign Ministry has said

The approval of a large aid package for Ukraine by the US House of Representatives is the same as funding terrorism, according to Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.

In a post on her Telegram channel on Saturday, Zakharova said that the potential allocation of further military assistance to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan would only aggravate the crisis in the world.

“Military aid to the Kiev regime is direct sponsorship of terrorist activities, funds sent to Taiwan is interference in the internal affairs of China, while aid sent to Israel is a straight way to unprecedented escalation of a conflict in the region,” she said.

On Saturday, the lower house of the US Congress passed a $95 billion package that includes almost $61 billion in aid to Ukraine, including funds for the purchase of weapons and military equipment. Most of the rest is allocated to Israel and Taiwan. The Senate is poised to vote on the bill on April 23 with final passage expected by the end of the week.

Washington is driving deeper into a hybrid war with Russia, Zakharova said in a separate statement issued by the Russian Foreign Ministry, adding that the US would end up facing a “loud and humiliating fiasco on a par with Vietnam or Afghanistan.”

READ MORE: Kiev deliberately targeting journalists – Kremlin The spokeswoman said “the US is ready to pump Ukraine with weapons so that Kiev could fight to the last Ukrainian, and continue to terrorist acts against civil objects on Russian sovereign territory and civilians, as well as sabotage attacks and killings of journalists.”

Zakharova stated that ordinary Ukrainians were being “forcibly driven to slaughter as cannon fodder” with Washington no longer betting on a Ukrainian victory against Russia, but hoping to keep Kiev afloat until the US presidential election in November.

You see I was just thinking about that: AIPAC is unconstitutional in the context of elections. Any elections TBH.

Anyone who has received money from them cannot stand for office, because it is a conflict of interest.

It sounds like he is wishing evil upon us, but then one realizes that that evil has already been visited upon the Russian people. The war he is talking about, with all its technology, is currently raging over there and the US is feeding it.

Wait until the playing-with-fire bites back, is what he is saying.

noice