2
StageS3T 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to listen to Infowars everyday. I wasn't a big fan of Alex Jones. He always acted like a clown and would never let his guests speak. I still found value in the content provided by his team. However, I had my suspicions that he was controled opposition.

After he came out against Q, it became apparent, that he wasn't legit. Aside from the whole Bill Hicks thing. If you dont know, Bill Hicks is a comedian that was said to have died in the same timeframe Alex emerged out of nowhere. Bill also happened to have a character he would play, that was an over the top political activist named Alex Jones. Alex himself stated in his child custody case that it is all an act.

How is divulging the secrets of the deep state benefiting them? He states facts, but does it in a way that is seen by many as unhinged or crazy. Because of that, anytime we try to have a discussion around those facts, the only thing the person we are trying to redpill hears is Alex pounding the table and yelling. Completely acting a fool. Normies walk away, not informed, but with degraded respect for the messenger and message.

3
StageS3T 3 points ago +3 / -0

I too thought of Paula Jones instantly. The misdirection in that, is that President Trump was not convicted of paying someone hush money.

The conviction was for a payment made to Cohen. It was called legal fees, but they say the money was an illegal campaign contribution and not legal fees because it was used to suppress negative information, in the form of hush money, and it helped his election.

I believe this "crime" was used by the white hats because the Clinton Campaign and the DNC were both fined by the FEC for the exact same thing. It was found that they payed for opposition research in regard to the Steele Dossier and called it legal fees. Fines! A slap on the wrist considering they gave President Trump 34 felony convictions and are threatening to throw him in prison. It's just another glaring example of a two teir justice system. Waking up normies in mass.

Another facet is the obvious suppression of the Hunter laptop. Now, there is added emphasis that if you suppress information during an election cycle, it merits felony charges and possibly prison time.

1
StageS3T 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been patient for what seems like forever. I wouldn't say I'm much more educated. Don't sell yourself short. I'm pissed too.

2
StageS3T 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately you'll have to wait until the Trump Administration takes over. Be patient. Not much further.

3
StageS3T 3 points ago +3 / -0

I respect your position and I too believe it's wrong what they are doing, and they're allowed to break the law to do it. However, there's a multifaceted response. Just naming a few, in no particular order.

  1. Establish precedent

  2. Expose sleeper assets and resources

  3. Wake up people that have to see it to believe it.

  4. Document the laws that have been broken and collect evidence for future prosecution.

  5. Cross that unique threshold an individual requires to take action.

2
StageS3T 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. It's horrible what they are doing to guys like Bannon, Manafort and Navaro to name a few. But now they cannot say that it can't be done to the DS. If they try lawfare to fight a reciprocal response, you reference precedent and they no longer have an argument against it.

6
StageS3T 6 points ago +8 / -2

Perfect! Don't get me wrong, it sucks for Bannon but this was part of his role and he knows it. The precedent is now set for anyone who is found in Contempt of a Congressional Subpoena. Anyone who ignores a Congressional subpoena can now go to prison and everyone that was a cheerleader against Bannon has to take it or face their own words.

2
StageS3T 2 points ago +2 / -0

I first saw this on a video made by Joe Biggs (Infowars) just before leaving the organization. Alex Jones said it was unrelated. Given Alex's stance on Q and Pizzagate. My opinion is that they agreed to disagree.

2
StageS3T 2 points ago +2 / -0

Post 918 Mar 10, 2018 2:05:58 PM EST

You are learning.

How many coincidences before it becomes

mathematically impossible?

Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.

Q

Per Post 60 Nov 02, 2017 7:03:36 PM EDT

You can count the people who have the full

picture on two hands.

Of those (LESS THAN 10 people) only three are

non-military.

It's by far the most mysterious. Noboby knows for sure who Q is. For the sake of the fact that many operators contribute to Q. Only 9 or less have the whole picture. No matter how educated a guess is, it's ultimately that, a guess. We could file the the question away with the unsolvable but by saying "wait until you learn who" keeps my interest.

Edit. Tried better format

11
StageS3T 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thank you. Edited and much easier to read.

6
StageS3T 6 points ago +6 / -0

The biggest waste of time is arguing with the fool and fanatic who doesn’t care about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions.

Never waste time on discussions that make no sense. There are people who, for all the evidence presented to them, do not have the ability to understand.

Others who are blinded by ego, hatred and resentment, and the only thing that they want is to be right even if they aren’t.

When IGNORANCE SCREAMS, intelligence moves on.

11
StageS3T 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would say it was a focal point. Endless coverage to clog the news cylce with a controled narative. While important questions go unasked and vialable exculpatory evidence is ignored. JMO.