2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because Hillary + Obama knowingly coordinated to provide Iran with a means to construct nuclear weapons and trigger WW3.

This disclosure must be organically sourced (e.g. "surprise" third party tracing) to convince as much of the general population as possible.

Think about it. Would the general population accept that assertion? Hillary + Obama treason? No, it would be smeared by MSM as Trump lie, falsified evidence, etc.

4
SuddenRealization 4 points ago +4 / -0

They never thought she would lose.

What happens when Clinton (under Obama's purview) sold Uranium One assets to Russia and that Uranium in Iran is traceable back?

6
SuddenRealization 6 points ago +6 / -0

First Maduro (original strike planned on Christmas Day)

Now Iran to start off March Madness? It's a happening!

U1 evidence and Killary up next?

14
SuddenRealization 14 points ago +14 / -0

Praying for you BanjoMan!

The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you; the Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace.

He will hold you in His hands. May His miraculous healing touch your life!

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

The referenced tweets don't contain references to "biblical" like these private texts do.

I'm also sharing because the ref to 25th amendment is very interesting.

5
SuddenRealization 5 points ago +5 / -0

Epstein 12/31/18 "Hell of. Year. Next will be biblicl"

Q in 2019

u/#q3624

u/#q3565

NSA access to all texts?

Simple coincidence?

4
SuddenRealization 4 points ago +4 / -0

Last time I posted Russiagate subpoenas went out.

5
SuddenRealization 5 points ago +5 / -0

Me too but I think this might have legs this time.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

Potentially but my concern is not about the validity of that claim.

My concern is she is either:

Leaking classified information.

Injecting her own personal opinion as if it's documented classified information.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

She supported Obama.

She "led" the declassification task force which was a House led initiative to attach itself to the actual declass work being done by our DNI Tulsi and others. Trump already signed an executive order to do declass. Why did the House need to make its own requests and include unrelated topics like UFOs?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-anna-paulina-luna-lead-congressional-task-force-declassification-jfk-assassination-records-more

You saw how well the so called Epstein list declass went. We have no additional 9/11 details.

Then she goes on Rogan and starts spouting off about interdimensional beings, acting like she has secret classified information.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5451464-luna-lawmakers-evidence-interdimensional-beings/

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

This sub feels a bit subdued even though we're watching the Russiagate movie play out before our eyes. Maybe when the arrests happen?

70
SuddenRealization 70 points ago +70 / -0

If Trump's "why are we still talking about Epstein" comment is some kind of Art of the Deal moment, he can handle the blowback.

At face value it rightfully deserves to be criticized and exposed.

4
SuddenRealization 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some of you haven't read the q posts on Elon and it shows.

2
SuddenRealization 2 points ago +2 / -0

I WISH it said that. It's blanket.

Subsection (c) states that no state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

4
SuddenRealization 4 points ago +4 / -0

What's the beast system? It's all commerce. The ability to buy and sell.

Even if you "trust" Republicans, Democrats will come in and use this to harass patriots.

5
SuddenRealization 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rogue judges are going to act regardless of this provision and the internet has survived without a federal restriction of state regulation on it.

You realize people said the exact same thing about the Patriot act right? Now we're illegally surveilled by the federal govt and no one bats an eye.

4
SuddenRealization 4 points ago +4 / -0

I generally agree with that but this is not federalism or reserving powers to the states.

This is refusing to allow regulation to stand or fail on its own merit.

8
SuddenRealization 8 points ago +8 / -0

I honestly have to ask this time if we're being played. If we hold the same standards as we did for "build back better" = 666 wouldn't that also apply to "big beautiful bill" ? I'm a Trump supporter but I don't like this at all. This is worse than the Patriot Act. I am hoping and praying this was a rogue Repub act not Trump's doing but with the Palantir actions I'm not so sure anymore.

1
SuddenRealization 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm beginning to suspect that the Golden Dome is a critical element of the plan. What if we cannot release the Epstein blackmail details without risking nuclear retaliation.

"The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital."

view more: Next ›