11
ThinkItThrough 11 points ago +11 / -0

Comment says, “The testimony by J.J. Carrell was given on November 19, 2024, during a joint hearing before the Subcommittees on Border Security and Enforcement and on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability of the House Committee on Homeland Security.”

8
ThinkItThrough 8 points ago +8 / -0

To stop the violence, or to ensure that violence proceeds unchecked? 🤔 Didn’t he call for violence?

3
ThinkItThrough 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully all of the information will go to the IRS. You can bet money that none of what they are being paid to protest has been declared on any tax return . . .

5
ThinkItThrough 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good riddance, regardless of the spin this article gives the story. Klobuchar says the family of Renee Good deserves justice. If Minnesota were capable of true justice, (gigantic “if”), then, had she lived, Renee Good would have been prosecuted for attempted murder. And, had the officer not defended himself, she likely would have killed him, in which case true justice would have resulted in her being charged with, not just attempted murder, but first-degree murder. And her wife, telling her “drive baby drive,” would have been charged as an accomplice. Apparently true justice violates Thompson’s conscience, so I agree, a dark day.

“Woe to those who call good evil and evil good.”

2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh c’mon, “thorough, unbiased” is a bit too much to hope for . . .

4
ThinkItThrough 4 points ago +4 / -0

But there is a stark difference in that Ashli Babbit was not trying to kill her shooter whereas this woman was trying to kill her shooter. This just makes the media’s sole objective of controlling public opinion blatantly obvious. As Mika famously said, “that is our job.“

https://youtu.be/vZpxwlQFz_U?feature=shared

6
ThinkItThrough 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why on earth would officials in Minnesota want to come to the aid of someone who is seeking to expose the truth and might interfere with their gravy train of misappropriated taxpayer funds?

3
ThinkItThrough 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree, important factors. I worked in education. Many years ago, I had to attend a school in-service on teaching math. The presenter, representing the school district, said that it did not matter whether the student got the right answer, as long as they used the correct process. I raised my hand and asked the presenter, “Would you please tell that to my bank?” (Afterwards, I was called into the principal’s office because of the question I asked. But I did not back down.)

5
ThinkItThrough 5 points ago +5 / -0

I do not think that 50 years ago the same number of people honestly believed that it is a good thing to cut off the penis of a 5-year-old if he says he is really a girl, or that the concept that “there are correct answers in math” was racist, but they just didn’t have the opportunity to voice those beliefs to large numbers of people. I think people have been systematically led to not think or evaluate, and to ignore/accept irrationality.

6
ThinkItThrough 6 points ago +6 / -0

Carl Higbie on Newsmax for the last 2 days has called on Pres. Trump to preemptively pardon anyone who does not pay federal income tax. 🤔

3
ThinkItThrough 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, I wonder what percentage of the fraud proceeds goes into the pocket of the state AG. 🤔

2
ThinkItThrough 2 points ago +2 / -0

A source told the outlet, "The arrest may be related to his past doxxing of ICE agents, or his various parole violations such as possessing forbidden weapons or police scanners, which have been well-documented online." Another person who spoke to Inside Wire said that Quillin had been "accused of hacking DHS radios."

I can’t imagine that any law enforcement agency in California was allowed to arrest someone for doxxing ICE agents. That would interfere with voter fraud that benefits those in power, not to mention other types of fraud which is likely much, much more extensive than what has been uncovered in Minnesota.

1
ThinkItThrough 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe if you asked about Tim Walz (without the “t”) you would get a different answer?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›