Hmm, that's not what I'm seeing, and that's not what the numbers are saying.
What numbers are you looking at? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm trying to figure out why I keep seeing people here state that the job market is so bad when that's not what I'm seeing, and that's not what the numbers are saying.
I know that we tend to skew more toward rural areas, and those places don't really have good job outlooks. So maybe it's a location thing.
I understand what you're saying, I'm just trying to understand why it's all tied up in how much money someone has. If it's just a case of people being sociopaths/psychopaths, why does it matter if they have money?
I understand that money can buy bad people out of trouble, but there must be a reason why people associate the very wealthy with the horrible things Q speaks of. And surely it can't be all wealthy people who do these things. There must be some middle-income or even low-income psychopaths out there.
I'm not trying to contradict what you're saying. I'm just trying to understand how and why wealth got tied into the defining criteria here.
If it just means "psychopath" or "sociopath" or similar, why not just use those words? Why bring wealth into it?
I've never really understood who exactly are the "elite". It seems like it's just supposed to be the very wealthy, but as you say, Trump is very wealthy but is obviously not who people are talking about.
When did being wealthy start being a bad thing? And if someone was born into a wealthy family, it's obviously not something they were in control of.
What someone does with their money is obviously important. It can be used in good ways or in bad. But unless you know exactly how someone uses their money, it's just assuming that they're a bad person.
Is it anything beyond class warfare? And if not, who decides who gets a free pass, like President Trump or Elon Musk, or Rush Limbaugh (RIP) or Tucker Carlson?
Where are there massive layoffs? I'm not saying you're wrong, it's just that I haven't heard anything about it, and employers are desperate to hire people where I live. There are help wanted signs everywhere, and some places are even advertising online and on tv trying to find people. Everything from food servers making $13/hr to computer security specialists making 150-200k/yr. Nurses, teachers, cashiers, etc...
Maybe it's a regional thing?
How does the age of my account matter? Does it change anything I say?
You never address the content of my comments, you just deflect.
You guys know that "UFO" does not equal "space aliens", right?
Unidentified Flying Object- most likely some sort of drone or something similar used in spying.
We'll always have problems with illegal immigrants unless we put our foot down on the people who employ them.
Things like construction, landscaping, restaurants, and house cleaners will most likely cost a good bit more, but we should even out because of the money saved that would be spent on them.
Serious question- do you really believe that?
A Republic is a form of democracy. Saying the US isn't a democracy because it's a republic is like saying a Pepsi isn't a soda because it's a Pepsi.
A republic is a form of democracy.
Really, I keep seeing "we're not a democracy, we're a republic!"
It's like saying Pepsi isn't a soda because it's a Pepsi.
No, they call it a democracy because it's a democracy. A Republic is a type of democracy.
Saying we're not a democracy because we are a republic is like saying Coke isn't a soda, because it's a Coke.
Is a type of democracy.
So did The Plan change, or were we just wrong all this time thinking that the tribunals would be made public?
CA is an expensive place to live. If you can't find a job there, why not move?
I don't understand that. So many people claiming they're out of work, yet there are Help Wanted signs every where. Do people think it's beneath them to be a waitress or work at McDonald's? It might not pay much, but it's better than sitting around doing nothing.
Then why was everyone, including President Trump, so stoked that we kept breaking the record during his first term?
Seriously, that was one of his main talking points, how the stock market was doing so well.
But now it doesn't matter?
Why the constant jerking around?
What I don't understand is how the stock market can be doing as well as it is and people are having it so bad.
When President Trump was in office the Dow kept breaking records for the all time high. I think it it had hit 30,000 for the first time while he was leaving office
It's now over 37,000. But everyone is still broke? It makes no sense to me how that can happen.
So we won't be seeing them get executed at Gitmo for treason?
I thought that was one of the main parts of the plan.
Oh yeah, he's definitely suspicious.
When was there a conversation about whether he defended the trips or not? All I said was he provided information on those trips. Whether he defended them or not is irrelevant. Whether he's a nice guy or a jerk or even doing shady stuff is irrelevant.
The entire point of that post was to point out that everyone whose names were released wasn't a pedophile. Because for some reason, that seemed to be what many Trump supporters thought. And they were going around making asses of themselves with post after post showing everyone they didn't have a clue what they were talking about.
It was even more concerning when I saw people here doing the same thing. It doesn't really track well with this being an elite research board.
Because it surely seems like they didn't do a lick of research on it before running around posting about it.
I have just gotten into looking at the Epstein stuff, and I wasn't aware of those flight logs.
When I wrote that post, I was in the middle of reading each of those documents released. I simply hadn't seen anything in those documents about them going to the island.
I didn't claim that they had never been there. I said I hadn't seen anything about him being at the island so far. Because I hadn't. I had only seen the comments about the "he likes them young" quote.
Thanks for the info in your post. It will help me learn more about this.
I think I'll try to look into it this weekend when I get the chance.
I really don't know what an undercover informant would have to do, sorry.
But that's an interesting angle to follow up on.
Just a heads-up
Any mention of Clinton liking young girls on other message boards (and with some friends and family, I except) is being met with Trump's quotes saying what a great guy Epstein is and admiring him for having beautiful girlfriends and liking them young.
So just be warned that it opens up a huge kettle of fish that many Anons weren't expecting and did poor jobs of responding to, from what I've seen.
So you might want to figure out some good comebacks before you get into a discussion about it.
That makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.